Abrasive Personality Disorder: Causes and Symptoms
In 1994, Stuart B. Litvak, Ph.D. proposed a newly identified type of personality disorder. He suggested including the abrasive personality disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). While abrasive personality disorder shared many characteristics of other Axis II disorders, he felt the abrasive personality possessed sufficient idiosyncratic features to warrant a separate classification (Litvak, 1994, p. 7).
The call for a new classification for abrasive people generated a great deal of attention. Perhaps, because we all deal with a handful of coworkers, family members, and discourteous drivers that we are certain would qualify for a certified “abrasive” diagnosis—a certified (@$$).
While we are nearing thirty years since Litvak’s call for inclusion of the new personality type, it still has not made the exclusive list of Axis II superstars, sharing the the stage with other delightful personality diagnoses such as Narcissistic, Sadistic, Antisocial, and Passive-Aggressive.
Abrasive Personalities
For our everyday interactions, we don’t need a DSM diagnosis to determine who we should limit our interaction with for our own mental sanity. The diagnosis, at least with personality disorders, has limited functional uses. Personality disorders are historically difficult to treat. Even when properly diagnosed, personality disorder patients are extremely resistant to treatment.
The abrasive personality type encompasses the “control freaks,” and a host of other “difficult: and “nasty people.” This personality type often includes “the inexpugnable, overbearing individual, who typically can be manipulative, nocuous, domineering, obnoxious, intimidating, forceful and downright impossible” (Litvak, 1994, p. 7).
Personality Disorders
Personality disorders diverge from the medical model of disease. Personality disorders do not fit into the classic patterns of disease, making them difficult to diagnose and treat. Personality disorders do not have a specific onset time, a period of disease, and a treatment that promotes healing (Simona, et al., 2019).
Because of this oddity of personality disorders, many doctors and professors argue they don’t qualify as a mental illness. Robert Hirschfeld, Professor of Psychiatry Weill Cornell Medical College at Cornell University, explains ” It is not completely clear from this [DSM III-R] definition [of mental disorder] whether personality disorders are mental disorders because of the requirement that deviant behavior, often the hallmark of personality disorders, cannot be considered a mental disorder unless it is a symptom of dysfunction in the person” (Litvak, 1994).
And thus it goes with the proposed abrasive personality disorder. The proposed criteria for the disorder is a list of behaviors, with no known underlying biological dysfunction. Most likely there are biological causes (or at least associated biological factors). T. Franklin Murphy wrote in an article on personality disorders that, “Research for causes of personality disorders continues. Many elements remain unknown. However, scientists are certain heredity and environmental factors play an important role” (Murphy, 2022).
However, we can assume there is a biological structure that is stress activated that leads to personalities that create personality characteristics that diverge from societal and cultural norms, leading to a variety of dysfunctional social behaviors. This explanation fits into the general adaptation stress model and epigenetics.
Until these underlying mechanisms can be pinpointed, we are just left with lists of bad behaviors that are grouped into clusters and labeled. When a cluster of behaviors occurs together often enough in research, then the behavior cluster may be considered as a specific disorder.
Follow Up Research On the Abrasive Personality
The case for inclusion of the abrasive personality disorder hasn’t been completely ignored. The disorder has been included in books. Some researchers have taken upon the task of testing Litvak’s 1994 criteria to determine if the clustering of behaviors create a unique grouping apart from some of the other personality disorders.
In 2018, a group of researchers conducted experiments to test Litvak’s hypothesis. They used the Abrasive Personality Traits Scale (APT). The APT scale is a 33 item Likert-type scale (Coolidge et al., p. 117).
Frederick L. Coolidge and his colleagues determined from there research that, “The results preliminarily demonstrate that abrasiveness may constitute a reliable and valid personality symptom cluster.” Based on their research they state, “The traits do appear to meet the general criterion for a personality disorder in that the disorder must cause significant personal, social, and occupations/educational problems” (Coolidge et al, p. 122).
Associated Concepts
- Axis II Personality Disorders: Traits of an abrasive personality are somewhat similar to those found in Axis II personality disorders, such as borderline personality disorder, avoidant personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, and narcissistic personality disorder. These disorders often involve patterns of behavior that are inflexible, maladaptive, and cause significant impairment or distress.
- Intermittent Explosive Disorder: This disorder involves repeated, sudden episodes of impulsive, aggressive, violent behavior or angry verbal outbursts, which are out of proportion to the situation. Individuals with this disorder may exhibit extreme abrasiveness.
- Neurotic Tendencies: Historically, the term “neurotic” has been used to describe certain psychological tendencies that can include antagonism, narcissism, perfectionism, and arrogant vindictiveness, which are also associated with abrasive personalities.
- Empathy Deficit Disorder: This refers to a condition of lacking ability to feel, understand and resonate with another’s feelings.
- Borderline Personality Disorder Theory: Emotional dysregulation is a core feature of borderline personality disorder, and theories related to this disorder often address the mechanisms of emotional dysregulation.
A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic
Abrasive personality disorder may never make the pages of the DSM. Not that it doesn’t meet the requirements for inclusion, but the addition of another category of a personality disorder isn’t justified when current personality orders already cover many of the same traits. Antisocial and sadistic personality disorders have high overlap with the proposed abrasive personality disorder.
Delroy L. Paulhus’ work on “dark personalities” provides insightful understanding of the taxonomy of hurtful and abrasive people. Outside of the clinic, however, we tend to call all of these difficult personalities ‘narcissists,’ ignoring the variety of subtle differences.
Whether abrasive personality disorder is ever included in the DSM or not doesn’t matter. We, as individuals, need to figure out our own path to living among others that are difficult, limiting our exposure of vulnerabilities that they ruthlessly extort, and then, we must establish a way to maintain our own sanity in the face of all of their hurtful bombardment of our wellness.
Last Update: January 27, 2026
References:
Coolidge, F., Valenzuela, I., Segal, D., Feliciano, L., & , (2018). An Empirical Investigation of a New Measure to Assess Abrasive Personality Disorder Traits. Psychology. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2018.91008
(Return to Main Text)
Litvak, S. (1994/2006). Abrasive personality disorder: Definition and diagnosis. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 24(1), 7-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02306580
(Return to Main Text)
Murphy, T. Franklin (2022) Personality Disorders. Psychology Fanatic. Published: 3-17-2022; Retrieved: 9-1-2022. Website: https://psychologyfanatic.com/personality-disorders/
(Return to Main Text)
Paulhus, D. (2014). Toward a Taxonomy of Dark Personalities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 421-426. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414547737
(Return to Main Text)
Paulhus, D., Buckels, E., Trapnell, P., & Jones, D. (2021). Screening for Dark Personalities. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(3), 208-222. DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000602
(Return to Main Text)
Simona, Trifu; Simona, Dorina; Iliescu, Ioana; Iliescu, Daniela; Mateescu, Roxana; Trifu, Antonia Ioana (2019) Anti-Social Personality Disorder. Journal of Health and Medical Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 4, 509-515. Website: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3502191
(Return to Main Text)

