Emotional Intimacy: A Key to Deep Connection

We are emotional beings. When we contact the world, the sea of stimuli stirs our soul. Felt experience is personal—emotions reside in the core of our being. Without feeling, life fades into nothingness—bland and immemorable. Intimate relationships share these private emotional wonders. Emotional communion enhances feelings of belonging and assists in regulating emotions. Emotional intimacy is a partnership of feeling.

Emotions are a complex bundle of biological stimulation and interpretive language. Robert Augustus Masters in his fabulous book Emotional Intimacy describes emotions as “ever-moving wonders, bringing together physiology, feeling, cognition, and conditioning, allowing us to connect and communicate in more ways than we can imagine. The more deeply we know our emotions, the deeper and more fulfilling our lives will be” (Masters, 2013). Lisa Barrett adds, “Emotions are meaning. They explain your interoceptive changes and corresponding affective feelings, in relation to the situation. They are a prescription for action” (Barrett, 2018, p. 126).

​​Introduction: The Deep Bonds of Intimacy

We soothe the negative and magnify the positive when we share emotions with receptive others. Expressing emotions can bridge the gulfs of separateness, establishing trust. But there is a paradox. Expression isn’t without risk, expressing emotions invites exploitation and potential rejection. Two primary goals for wellness collide.

Our goal of interpersonal connection slams into the need to protect against harm. Sandra L. Murray, John G. Holmes, and Nancy Collins wrote, “The psychological costs of rejection only increase as interdependence and closeness grow” (Murray et al., 2006). Personal revelations invite intimacy and the possibility of rejection. Basically, closeness may contribute or subtract from wellbeing depending on the decency and receptivity of our partner.

Protective Defenses and Intimacy

The secure relationship, while desired, remains allusive. Through habitual protections, the wholeness of the self is fractured—an essential part of being is lost. The protecting adult’s fear of rejection dominates when desire for connection emerge.​

​Murray, Holmes and Collins wrote:

“Given the personal pain of romantic rejection, people should be motivated to think and behave in ways to minimize dependence on a partner. However, people need to risk substantial dependence to establish the kind of satisfying relationship that can fulfill basic needs for belonging or connectedness” (Murray et al., 2006).

This is the ultimate dilemma, where the stakes are high and risks substantial, opposing benefits seemingly battle for supremacy. While emotional expression is crucial for intimacy, it is also ripe with vulnerability. Partners hoping for closeness must establish a safe environment that diminishes this nasty paradox. We must protect openness, sharing and healing with compassionate reception. This builds trust, and trust mediates the fear, welcoming greater closeness.

Masters wrote:

“Through mutually sharing and exploring our emotions with another. . . we generate a powerfully alive, emotionally rich ‘we space’ for further relational exploration and deepening” (Masters, 2013).

Developing and Cultivating Emotional Intimacy

Building Trust and Security

Building trust and security are paramount for cultivating emotional intimacy in any relationship. Trust, defined as a firm belief in the reliability, truth, ability, or strength of your partner, and security, which encompasses the feeling of being safe, supported, and comfortable expressing oneself without fear of judgment or rejection, create the essential foundation upon which emotional closeness can flourish (Murphy, 2015).

Vulnerability, the act of exposing one’s true self, including fears and insecurities, is a prerequisite for deep emotional connection. However, individuals will only allow themselves to be vulnerable when they feel safe and believe that their partner will respond with empathy, compassion, and respect.

Without this sense of trust and security, partners are likely to withhold their true thoughts and feelings, fearing potential hurt, betrayal, or rejection, thus hindering the development of genuine emotional intimacy. As Sidney Jourard explains that self-disclosure, a key component of intimacy, is more likely to occur when trust is present (Jourard, 1971). Furthermore, attachment theory suggests that a satisfying relationship depends on trusting a partner to be available and responsive to one’s needs, which in turn promotes self-disclosure and intimacy.

The absence of trust and security breeds an environment of emotional distance and superficial connection. Fear of judgment or rejection can prevent individuals from fully expressing themselves, creating barriers to genuine intimacy. Trudy Govier explains that distrust implies anxiety, fear, lack of openness, and poor communication (Govier, 1998). Conversely, when trust and security are present, partners feel safe enough to engage in open and honest communication, which is crucial for revealing one’s inner world and fostering mutual understanding.

Practicing Vulnerability and Self-Disclosure

​Basically, we should share when safe but protect when dangerous. Easy, right? The concept is simple, but the practice is complex. Hazardous others craftily disguise themselves as something they are not, coaxing trust but reacting with indifference. Our predictions fail. We share when we shouldn’t and protect when we should. We dangerously invite ridicule and rejection or sorrowfully miss grand opportunities for belonging. Consequently, we create intimacy through cautious openness, slowly increasing disclosures as trust develops.

John Gottman, the relationship guru and director of the famous love labs at the University of Washington, suggests, “We need to feel safe enough to allow our partner to do the soothing that we are incapable of at the moment” (Gottman, 2011). We are social beings, intimately connected, welcoming social resources to regulate powerful emotions of living. Emotional sharing is the glue of intimacy—but only when given from a position of safety.

A child constantly rebuffed adapts, adopting protections. While a critical caregiver gives feedback to a child from a variety of verbal and nonverbal communications, the harsh message is the same, “your emotions don’t matter.” This lesson follows the hapless child into adulthood. Fearful children become fearful adults, burying emotions to protect against disabling attacks.

Active Listening and Responsive Communication

Active listening and responsive communication are fundamental to building emotional intimacy as they create a cycle of mutual understanding, validation, and care within a relationship. Intimacy is built upon a two part exchange. Caryl Rusbult and Harry Reis explain:

“Intimacy is enhanced when another’s response to one’s self-disclosure communicates understanding, validation, and caring” (Rusbult & Reis, 2004).

We achieve this intimate connection in communication through the practice of active listening.

Active listening involves fully concentrating on what your partner is saying, both verbally and nonverbally, showing empathy, and seeking to understand their perspective without judgment (Murphy, 2024). This includes paying attention, making good eye contact, nodding, and asking clarifying questions to ensure accurate comprehension of their thoughts and feelings (Fruzzetti, 2006). By actively listening, you create a safe and supportive environment where your partner feels heard and valued, which is crucial for them to open up and share their inner world, including their vulnerabilities, fears, and desires.

It is common during heated exchanges to employ protective strategies. The emotions involved in these communications ignite fear because an important bond is threatened. Our minds begin to race, seeking resolutions. We get pulled into the emotional exchange, dragged down by our emotions. Gottman refers to this as emotional flooding. A characteristic of emotional flooding is our cognitions change. We fail to hear the messages our partner is sending and begin to contemplate retaliatory responses based on flimsy listening of words. Basically, we become defensive and active listening stops.

Responsive Communication

Responsive communication builds upon active listening by demonstrating that you not only hear your partner but also understand, accept, and care about their experience. Sue Johnson wrote that responsive communication means, “accepting and placing a priority on the emotional signals your partner conveys and sending clear signals of comfort and caring when your partner needs them. Sensitive responsiveness always touches us emotionally and calms us on a physical level” (Johnson, 2008).

According to the interpersonal model of intimacy, intimacy is enhanced when a partner’s response to self-disclosure communicates understanding, validation, and caring (Rusbult & Reis, 2004).

Validation, a key component of responsive communication, involves showing your partner that their feelings make sense to you, even if you don’t necessarily agree with them. This can be conveyed verbally and nonverbally, such as by acknowledging their emotions (“I know you are really disappointed”) or by explaining how their feelings are understandable given the circumstances (Murphy, 2021). When partners respond with empathy and understanding, they foster a sense of emotional safety, allowing for genuine emotional exchange and growth.

Elements of Active Emotionally Intimate Listening

Don and Martha Rosenthal present five elements to active listening in the context of intimate relationships.

• They have room for whatever you are feeling without feeling threatened by it
• They do not judge you, or believe they know best what you should think, feel, or do
• They honor the path you have chosen and wish you well on your journey
• They care about your inner life enough to want to understand it fully
• They let you feel the fullness of their empathy (Rosenthal & Rosenthal, 2016).

---

The consistent practice of active listening followed by responsive communication creates a positive feedback loop that deepens emotional intimacy. When individuals feel understood, accepted, and cared for, they are more likely to self-disclose further, sharing more personal and revealing information. This mutual self-disclosure, coupled with ongoing responsiveness, fosters a sense of closeness, connectedness, and bondedness, which are core elements of intimacy (Harvey & Weber, 2001).

Moreover, these interactions build trust, the bedrock of any healthy intimate relationship, by demonstrating reliability, predictability, and a genuine concern for each other’s needs and feelings. By navigating vulnerabilities and resolving conflicts constructively through these communication styles, partners strengthen their emotional bond and create a more resilient and satisfying relationship.

Creating Shared Meaning and Experiences

Engaging in joint activities plays a significant role in deepening emotional bonds by creating shared experiences and fostering a sense of togetherness (Murphy, 2012).

When partners spend quality time together and participate in activities they both enjoy, they create a shared history of positive moments. These shared experiences can generate positive emotions, such as fun and joy, which contribute to a more positive outlook on the relationship and can soothe emotions and reduce loneliness. Regularly engaging in joint activities demonstrates a willingness to invest time and effort in the relationship, which can communicate care and strengthen the feeling of being a team. Moreover, doing things together provides opportunities for natural, informal connection outside of more serious discussions, allowing for a relaxed and enjoyable way to relate. This consistent presence and participation in shared life moments can build a sense of “we-ness” (Gottman, 2011) .

Beyond the immediate enjoyment, joint activities contribute to emotional intimacy by fostering trust and mutual support. By engaging in activities together, partners learn more about each other’s interests, skills, and how they approach different situations. Supporting each other’s participation in both shared and independent activities communicates that you value your partner’s well-being and growth. Talking about these experiences, whether done together or separately, builds trust and minimizes feelings of being left out (Fruzzetti, 2006).

Establishing rituals through regular joint activities, like date nights or shared morning routines, creates a sense of predictability and connection, reinforcing the importance of the relationship in daily life. Furthermore, successfully navigating activities together, including any challenges that may arise, can build confidence in the relationship’s ability to withstand difficulties and strengthens the emotional bond.

Emotional Sharing

Gottman expands on the importance of emotional sharing:

“There are few gifts a couple can give each other greater than the joy that comes from feeling known and understood” (Gottman, 1999, p. 51).

Gottman explains that this process is achieved through love maps. We keep detailed information about our partner. When we maintain and update the love map with rich detailed information about our partner, we not only show love, but we build fortitude. “Couples who have detailed love maps of each other’s world are far better prepared to cope with stressful events and conflict” (p. 49).

According to Daniel Siegel, our sense of belonging grows with increased emotional attunement. “Feeling felt,” Siegel explains, “is the subjective experience of mental state attunement” (Siegel, 2020).

Emotional attunement is a couple’s ability to observe internal emotions through verbal and non-verbal signals. The constant flow of information creates detailed love maps.

We want to be understood. “People want others to comprehend as they do themselves do their needs, abilities, traits, wishes, beliefs, and preferences” (Reis et al., 2017). Shared understanding is a task, accomplished with effort, not a magical gift. Knowledge of each other flows from mindful attention to words, actions, and expressions, leading to a mutual trust of understanding. We feel felt and this will “bolster confidence or trust” (Reis et al., 2017).

See Emotional Attunement for more on this topic

Navigating Conflict with Emotional Intimacy

Using empathy and understanding during disagreements.

Cultivating Empathy and Understanding:

Receptivity and perception of receptivity are not identical. Scholars emphasize the importance of perceptive receptivity for openness and sharing. However, if the perception is based on faulty grounds, the intimacy may be challenged with future disappointment. We need a “tolerably accurate reflection” of reality (Bowlby, 1973, p. 202).

When we believe our partner is receptive, the intensity and frequency of emotional sharing increases (Ruan et al., 2020). These predictions, whether right or wrong, play a critical role. “Evolutionary and attachment theorist assume that perceived responsiveness to need is the sine qua non of satisfying interpersonal relationships” (Murray et al., 2006).

According to Ruan, Reis et al. (2020), the perception of safety relies on three primary components. First, a caring component, believing our partner is responsive to our needs, and will be supportive—not exploitive. Secondly, we need understanding. We believe our partner is knowledgeable enough to respond appropriately to our self-defined needs and preferences. Lastly, we need our emotions validated. We must believe our partner will accept the legitimacy of our feelings. 

Emotionally Safe Environments

As partners, we can go awry, destroying perceptions of safety and limiting emotional expressions. Accordingly, we must remain mindfully aware of our reactions at critical moments. We routinely encounter opportunities to build trust. Gottman calls these ‘sliding-door’ moments. Emphatically, he points out that, “Sliding-door moments. . . are very small moments in which a need is expressed and the responsiveness of one’s partner is a test of trust. In these moments we test whether we can trust that our partner will turn toward our expressed need” (Gottman, 2011).

​When we perceive a partner is unresponsive to our needs, we fear rejection, destabilizing our psychological balance (Murray et al., 2006). Basically, supportive responses recognizes and validates emotion as appropriate.

Returning to Murray, Holmes and Collins research, they suggest we have an internal regulation system to gauge risks while still pursuing the goal of belonging. “The central assumption of the model is that negotiating interdependent life requires a cognitive, affective, and behavioral regulatory system for resolving the conflict between the goals of self-protection and relationship promotion.” The goal of this system is to optimize safety in our relationship environment. They explain this evaluative system in dynamic constantly balancing risk and reward (Murray et al., 2006).

See Risk Regulation Model for more on this topic

Associated Concepts

• Communication Skills: Effective communication is essential for developing and maintaining emotional intimacy, including the ability to listen actively and express oneself clearly and honestly.
• Sharing Emotions: This refers to the phenomenon where individuals synchronize their emotions and behaviors with those of others in their environment. This process can occur subconsciously, often influenced by nonverbal cues such as facial expressions, vocal tones, and body language.
• Conflict Resolution: The ability to navigate conflicts constructively is crucial for maintaining emotional intimacy in relationships.
• Counter-Dependency: This trait is characterized by a intense fear of commitment that motivates overt behaviors to avoid emotional dependence on others. This behavior often manifests as a defensive mechanism to protect oneself from perceived threats of vulnerability and emotional exposure.
• Empathy: The capacity to understand and share the feelings of another is a key component of emotional intimacy.
• Vulnerability: Allowing oneself to be vulnerable and open with another person is fundamental to creating emotional intimacy.
• Trust and Safety: Building a sense of trust and safety is necessary for partners to feel comfortable sharing their innermost thoughts and feelings.
• Interdependence Theory: This concept is a cornerstone of social psychology, explores the interconnected nature of relationships and the mutual influence among individuals. It offers insights into different types of interdependence, impacting behavior, satisfaction, and well-being within relationships.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

In our journey through life, we navigate a rich tapestry of emotions that shape our experiences and connections. The intricate dance of vulnerability and trust allows us to forge deeper bonds with those who truly matter. As we delve into the nuances of our internal landscapes, we find ourselves yearning for safe havens—a space where our thoughts and feelings are met with empathy and understanding. It is within these intimate exchanges that we come to appreciate not only the beauty in sharing but also the profound relief that comes from being genuinely seen and heard by another. In this shared experience, every joy is magnified, while sorrows transform into manageable weights as they are carried together.

Ultimately, emotional intimacy acts as a cornerstone for fulfilling relationships, creating an environment where love can flourish free from judgment or fear. When we cultivate this connection—this ‘we space’—we invite security into our lives; it becomes a sanctuary wherein we can explore our authentic selves without reservation. Here lies an opportunity for growth: both individually and collectively—as partners or friends committed to nurturing one another’s well-being. Let us embrace this commitment wholeheartedly, knowing that in doing so, we foster not only closeness but also resilience against life’s challenges; together steering through the highs and lows with unwavering support and compassion at each turn.

Last Update: December 29, 2025

Resources:

Barrett, Lisa Feldman (2018) How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Mariner Books; Illustrated edition. ISBN-10: 1328915433; APA Record: 2017-26294-000
(Return to Main Text)

​Bowlby, John (1973) Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2 Separation Anxiety and Anger. Basic Books; 1 edition. ISBN: 9780712666213
(Return to Main Text)

Fruzzetti, Alan E. (2006). The High-Conflict Couple: A Dialectical Behavior Therapy Guide to Finding Peace, Intimacy, and Validation. New Harbinger Publications; 1st edition. ISBN-10: 1458746127
(Return to Main Text)

Gottman, John M. (2011). The Science of Trust: Emotional Attunement for Couples. W. W. Norton & Company; Illustrated edition. ISBN-10: 0393707407; APA Record: 2011-06848-000
(Return to Main Text)

Gottman, John & Silver, Nan (1999) The Seven Principles for Making Marriages Work. Harmony; 1st edition. ISBN-10: 0553447718
(Return to Main Text)

Govier, Trudy (1998). Dilemmas of Trust. McGill-Queen’s University Press; First Edition. ISBN-10: 0773517979; DOI: 10.1017/S0012217300018643
(Return to Main Text)

Harvey, John H.; Weber, Ann L. (2001). Odyssey of the Heart: Close Relationships in the 21st Century. Psychology Press. ISBN-10: 0805838988; APA Record: 2001-05596-000
(Return to Main Text)

Johnson, Susan M. (2008). Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love. Basic Books; First Edition. ISBN-13: 9780316113007
(Return to Main Text)

Jourard, Sidney M. (1971). The Transparent Self. ‎Van Nostrand Reinhold Inc., U.S.; Revised edition. ISBN-10: 0442241933; APA Record: 1972-27107-000
(Return to Main Text)

Murray, Sandra. L.; Holmes, John G.; Collins, Nancy L. (2006). Optimizing Assurance: The Risk Regulation System in Relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
(Return to Main Text)

Murphy, T. Franklin (2024). The Art of Active Listening. Psychology Fanatic. Published: 4-16-2024; Accessed: 4-28-2025. Website: https://psychologyfanatic.com/active-listening/
(Return to Main Text)

Murphy, T. Franklin (2021). Understanding Emotional Validation: Healing Through Acceptance. Psychology Fanatic. Published 12-30-2021; Accessed: 4-28-2021. Website: https://psychologyfanatic.com/emotional-validation/
(Return to Main Text)

Murphy, T. Franklin (2015). Building Love: A Conscious Ongoing Process. Psychology Fanatic. Published: 1-1-2015; Accessed: 4-28-2025. Website: https://psychologyfanatic.com/building-love/
(Return to Main Text)

Murphy, T. Franklin (2012). Creating Intimacy: Building Deep Emotional Connections. Psychology Fanatic. Published: 3-26-2012; Accessed: 4-28-2025. Website: https://psychologyfanatic.com/creating-intimacy/
(Return to Main Text)

Reis, H., Lemay, E.; Finkenauer, C. (2017). Toward understanding understanding: The importance of feeling understood in relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(3). DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12308
(Return to Main Text)

Rosenthal, Don; Rosenthal, Martha (2016). Learning To Love: From Conflict To Lasting Harmony. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform; 2nd edition. ISBN-10: 1523363274
(Return to Main Text)

Ruan, Y.; Reis, H.; Clark, M.; Hirsch, J.; Bink, B. (2020). Can I Tell You How I Feel? Perceived Partner Responsiveness Encourages Emotional Expression. Emotion, 20(3), 329-342. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000650
(Return to Main Text)

Rusbult, Caryl E.; Reis, Harry T. (2004). Close Relationships: Key Readings (Key Readings in Social Psychology). Psychology Press; 1st edition. DOI: 10.4324/9780203311851
(Return to Main Text)

Siegel, Daniel J. (2020). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. The Guilford Press; 3rd edition. ISBN-10: 1462542751; APA Record: 2012-12726-000
(Return to Main Text)