Name Calling

Relationship patterns kill us—or save us. What are your patterns? Habitual interactions create the fabric of our relationships. We develop these healthy and unhealthy patterns, choreographing the swings, dips and cross-overs of intimacy over time. Habits subtly invade every encounter. We don’t recognize them—they appear normal. We act and react without thought. Complex factors combine, initiating a learning process, changing brain connections that draw the blueprints of behavior. In relationships, these complex motivators of behavior multiply by two, as individuals combine their learning and reactions to those of their lover. A nasty intruder to relationship communication patterns is when heated discussions devolve to include name calling.

By recognizing the triggers setting these harmful patterns into action, we can be warned of upcoming troubles before emotions drive us down unforgiving roads of name calling and character labeling. We can’t go down this path to the familiar dead-ends of hurt and disconnection. With fore-warning, we can avoid a damaging chain of events. Strong emotions interfere with rational thought, pulling thoughts from helpful introspection and into fury. If we wait until the emotions arrive, the feelings overwhelm and sweep us into the damaging cycles, requiring renewed promises and additional repairing of hurt.

Hurtful Name Calling Remain in Our Memories

Repair and promises don’t wipe clear memories. The past remains, haunting the future. New disagreement takes on the energy from the unsettled arguments, enraging the soul before different options can be explored. Stored emotions charge each new disagreement with unsolvable force. The growing resentment—if ignored—taints all communications. Until we unearth the hidden emotions, mundane disappointments will ignite fierce and painful conflict. The relationship is doomed.

Either partner can struggle with emotions, lacking tools to suppress overwhelm, they explode, run or shutdown. Studies indicate that men are more likely to be emotionally overwhelmed than women. But whether it is the man, or the woman doesn’t matter; once emotionally over-loaded, the course of discussions quickly change; what started as simple disagreements turns to bitter character assassinations, name calling, and emotional shut-down.

In psychology, we refer to these rushes of emotion that overwhelm as emotional flooding.

​​These downward conversational spirals signal the breakdown of the relationship. When we leave these hurtful patterns unattended, they cause irreparable damage to relationship and damaging the psyche of everyone.

Mindfulness of Emotional Arousal

We must be sensitive to approaching emotions, battening down the hatches, and securing vulnerable and delicate valuables. When emotions run hot, conversations become destructive. Lost in emotion, ego protection trumps problem resolution, we lose footing and slip into destructive patterns; little is solved in emotionally charged confrontations, further discussions are futile. Pause, step away—the problems can wait; continuing in emotionally charged states leads to foolish and hurtful words that sting, leaving hurts that continue into future negotiations.

​Even when the moment has passed, and the relationship appears to have recovered, the hurtful words still scar the soul, waiting for the next confrontation to leap to action and remind of the threatening nature of conflict.

​”The most special relationships, in my experience, are based on a combination of trust and mutual respect.”

~Charles Kennedy

​Partners don’t have to agree. Some disagreements stem from fundamental differences that never can be resolved. The autonomous differences can remain without diminishing intimacy. But these differences will resurface, requiring skilled negotiations.

​If we ignore fundamental differences, believing them resolved with a single discussion, then their return continual return frustrates. By pretending we converted our partner with shrewd and crafty genius, we miss the point of individualism. When unresolved issues continue to intrude, we express anger—our partner’s failure to change challenges our wisdom. The unresolved and unaccepted differences interrupt the connection and spoil the relationship.

How We Respond to Differences Matters

The issues aren’t the problem; ignored unresolved issues are the trouble.  A better way, instead of fighting for rightness, is showing our partner that we respect the differences by willingly struggling to see their point of view, and then deferring right and wrong judgment. When partners hear and respect each other, they can transcend differences. In psychology, we refer to this as emotional validation. Dividing issues often spark insecurity; but with respect, we promote security even while disagreeing.

​When we make a partner’s dignity paramount, showing concern for their emotions, we can disagree with maturity, without conversations deteriorating into protective and damaging attacks.

“Our repertoire of words for calling people names is often larger than our vocabulary of words to clearly describe our emotional states.” ​

​~Marshall B Rosenburg, Ph.D.

Overgeneralized Statements

When simple issues morph into overgeneralized statements and character assassination, the words cut, hurting feelings and resolving nothing. The harsh encounter imprints painful memories, storing them for future discussions. A simple discussion over unwashed dishes doesn’t degenerate into stabbing comments of character, “You’re lazy; you never do anything around the house.” Perhaps, there are work equity issues we should address, but we can’t solve this normal complication through heated and hurtful comments.

Aaron Beck in his classic book Love is Never Enough explains that as relationships progress we often become disillusioned with our partners, focusing on negatives. He warns that “as disillusionment progresses, single episodes of disappointment seem sufficient to justify attaching a negative label to the partner” (1989, p. 51).

Adulterated interpretations slapped with an all-inclusive label such as “you’re lazy” does not balance the unfairness. The accused partner scurries away feeling like an innocent victim, or vehemently attacks with impunity. This path doesn’t resolve the original issue, the dishes remain in the sink.

Arguing in Healthy Relationships

Partners in strong relationships do not agree on everything. they still occasionally argue. It is the nature of two autonomous beings being together. However, in these relationships arguments are different. They don’t attack the individuals, staying on the subject of the disagreement. David Richo wrote, “in a committed relationship we finally let go of our ego’s formidable insistence on being right, on getting our way, on competing and winning.” He continues, “we may still have arguments, but they do not last as long, they end in resolution, and they involve less replay of the past. We take the content of the argument as information rather than as grist for the mill of resentment” (Richo, 2002).

A primary rule in conflict resolution is refrain from name calling, labelling a single act as irrefutable evidence of deficiency. People are complex. One failure is just that—a single lapse. Beck expands on this, “people are not split into absolute opposites. If they are not totally responsible, it does not follow that they are irresponsible…People in general are neither all black nor all white, but varying blends of gray” (1989, p. 52).

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

Break the destructive chain of hurtful arguments . We must break the cycle. When partners push our hot buttons, we can intervene with new helpful patterns. If circumstances surprise and extreme emotions overwhelm, wait until flames cool, reaffirm love, share your feelings and then re-engage in the never-ending work of problem solving, and by damn, stop being lazy and do those unwashed dishes, please!

Join 50.2K other subscribers


Beck, Aaron T. (1989). Love Is Never Enough: How Couples Can Overcome Misunderstandings, Resolve Conflicts, and Solve Relationship Problems Through Cognitive Therapy. Harper Perennial; Reprint edition.

Richo, David (2002) How to Be an Adult in Relationships: The Five Keys to Mindful Loving. Shambhala; 1 edition.

You May Also Enjoy:

Compromise in Marriage psychology Fanatic article header image.

Compromise in Marriage

Two people that maintain their autonomy must learn to compromise in marriage or the relationship…
Read More
Intent to hurt article header image

Intent to Hurt

Underneath, we are driven to fight insult with force, willing to hurt those that we…
Read More
Emotional Communication. Psychology Fanatic

Emotional Communication

During emotional communication, we often use adaptive defenses to protect rather than effectively resolve the…
Read More

Explore Some of Psychology Fanatic’s Data Bases:


Leave a Reply

Discover more from Psychology Fanatic

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading

%d bloggers like this: