Unveiling the Layers of Self: Higgins’ Self-Discrepancy Theory

“Who am I?” This fundamental question echoes through our minds, shaping our self-concept, emotions, and behavior. Enter E. Tory Higgins and his groundbreaking self-discrepancy theory. This theory delves into the intricate dance between our perceived selves and the emotional tapestry woven around them.

In this exploration, we’ll unravel the layers of self-discrepancy, understand why the gap between our actual, ideal, and ought selves matters, and discover how these discrepancies influence our well-being. Buckle up—we’re about to embark on a journey through the corridors of identity, emotion, and personal growth.

Introduction to Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-discrepancy theory is built on the foundation of the perception of self. Beginning early in development, we formulate an image of ourselves. In psychology, we refer to the self as a “conceptual, organized, and coherent perception configuration of personal characteristics” (Irtelli et al., 2021).

Susan David, a psychologist on the faculty of Harvard Medical School wrote that simply paying attention “brings the self out of the shadows” (David, 2016). Blaise Pascal (1670), the seventeenth-century mathematician and philosopher, famously wrote: “All men’s miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone.” In quietness, in only our own company, we fear deeper reflections that reveal hidden aspects of ourselves.

When we come to see ourselves in alignment with reality, often conflict arises between the actual self and our perceptions of self. This is the basis of self-discrepancy theory. Self-discrepancy theory identifies three distinct perceptions of self: the Actual Self (the perception of who they are in the present), the Ideal Self (the representation of who they would like to be in the future), and the Ought Self (the representation of who a person believes they should become, such as duties and obligations).

A unique feature of self-discrepancy theory is the prediction of emotion type associated with the different discrepancies between the three perceptions of self (Phillips & Silvia, 2005).

Key Concepts of Self-Discrepancy Theory

Actual Self

In E. Tory Higgins’ self-discrepancy theory, the actual self represents how an individual perceives themselves to be currently. It is based on the attributes and characteristics that a person believes they possess in reality. This aspect of the self is influenced by both internal factors (such as personal values, beliefs, and goals) and external factors (such as societal norms and expectations).

According to Higgins, individuals may experience distress or negative emotions when there is a discrepancy between their actual self and their ideal self or ought self.

By understanding the concept of the actual self within Higgins’ framework, individuals can gain insights into their current perceptions of themselves and how these perceptions may influence their emotional experiences and behavior. By addressing any discrepancies between their actual self and other aspects of the self-concept, individuals can work towards achieving greater psychological well-being and alignment with their personal goals and values.

See Know Thyself for more on this topic

Ideal Self

In E. Tory Higgins’ self-discrepancy theory, the ideal self represents an individual’s perception of the attributes and qualities that they ideally want to possess or aspire to be. It is one of the three components of the self-concept.

The ideal self is influenced by personal goals, desires, values, and aspirations. It reflects an individual’s vision of their best possible selves and serves as a standard against which they evaluate their current state. Discrepancies between the ideal self and the actual self can lead to feelings of disappointment, dissatisfaction, or anxiety.

According to Higgins’ theory, individuals may experience two types of discrepancies related to their ideal self: “self-guides” discrepancies occur when there is a gap between one’s actual self and their ideal self; whereas “self-regulatory” discrepancies arise when there is a mismatch between one’s ought self and their ideal self.

Understanding the concept of the ideal self in relation to Higgins’ framework can help individuals recognize their aspirations, motivations, and areas for personal growth. By aligning their behavior with their ideals and working towards closing any gaps between their actual selves and desired selves, individuals can strive for greater fulfillment and psychological well-being.

See Ideal Self for more on this topic

Ought Self

In E. Tory Higgins’ self-discrepancy theory, the ought self represents the attributes and qualities that an individual believes they should possess based on external obligations, responsibilities, or societal expectations.

The ought self is shaped by cultural norms, moral values, social roles, and other external influences that dictate how individuals believe they ought to behave or what they ought to achieve. Discrepancies between the ought self and the actual self can lead to feelings of guilt, anxiety, or failure.

According to Higgins’ theory, individuals may experience two types of discrepancies related to their ought self: “self-guides” discrepancies occur when there is a gap between one’s actual self and their ought self; whereas “self-regulatory” discrepancies arise when there is a mismatch between one’s ideal self and their ought self.

Understanding the concept of the ought-self within Higgins’ framework can help individuals recognize external pressures and societal expectations that may influence their behavior and sense of identity. By addressing any misalignments between their actual selves and perceived obligations, individuals can work towards reducing feelings of guilt or inadequacy. Moreover, this theory provides insights for striving towards greater authenticity. Accordingly, individuals can find avenues for aligning their personal values with their goals and behaviors.

Discomfort from Discrepancy

Self-Discrepancy Theory, emotions play a crucial role in how individuals perceive and react to discrepancies between different aspects of the self. Leon Festinger, the brilliant social psychologist behind the theory of cognitive dissonance, explained that “becoming aware of conflicts between our beliefs and our actions, or between two simultaneously coexisting beliefs, violates the natural human striving for mental harmony, or consonance” (Banaji & Greenwald, 2016).

Higgins wrote that self-discrepancy theory assumes that each type of discrepancy “reflects a particular type of negative psychological situation that is associated with specific emotional/motivational problems” (Higgins, 1987).

Different Discrepancies of Self

The discrepancies between per[ectives of self create a unique clash that creates feeling affects. In Higgins’ introductory article to self-discrepancy theory, he not only identifies the discrepancies between the three domains of self, but also delineates between different standpoints of perspective. Basically, this is whether the perception of self is our own or if it is other motivated. For instance, our actual self may be self generated or generated by significant others. Each discrepancy between different domains of self, along with the standpoint of the perspective (own or other) creates a different cluster of emotions.

Actual (own)-Ideal (own) Discrepancy

In E. Tory Higgins’ self-discrepancy theory, the actual-ideal discrepancy refers to the difference between how an individual perceives themselves currently (actual self) and how they ideally want to be (ideal self). This type of discrepancy can lead to feelings of disappointment and dissatisfaction (Higgins, 1987).

When there is a significant gap between the actual self and the ideal self, individuals may experience negative emotions such as regret or a sense of unfulfillment. This misalignment can create psychological tension as individuals strive to bridge the divide between who they are and who they aspire to become.

According to Higgins’ theory, discrepancies between the actual self and ideal self can motivate individuals to work towards personal growth and development. By recognizing areas where they fall short of their desired selves, individuals may set goals, make changes in behavior, or engage in activities that help them move closer to their ideal selves.

Understanding and addressing actual-ideal discrepancies is important for promoting well-being and personal fulfillment. By acknowledging these gaps in one’s self-concept and taking steps towards aligning with their ideal selves, individuals can cultivate a stronger sense of identity coherence and satisfaction with their lives.

Actual (own)-Ideal (other) Discrepancy

This discrepancy occurs when a an individuals own actual perspective of self does not match the perspective of the self ideal a significant other has for that individual. The discrepancy theory predicts that this individual will have vulnerability “to shame , embarrassment, or feelings of downcast, because these emotions are associated with people believing that they have lost standing or esteem in the opinion of others” (Higgins, 1987).

Andrew P. Morrison and Robert D. Stolorow wrote that the greater the sensed “discrepancy or gap between ideal and actual selves, the greater the propensity for shame and for narcissistic insult” (Morrison & Stolorow, 1997).

Actual (own)-Ought (own) Discrepancy

The discrepancy between the actual self and the ought self refers to the misalignment between how an individual perceives themselves currently (actual self) and how they believe they should be based on external obligations or responsibilities (ought self). This type of discrepancy can lead to feelings of guilt, self-contempt, and uneasiness (Higgins, 1987).

When there is a significant gap between the actual self and the ought self, individuals may experience negative emotions such as shame or a sense of failure. This conflict arises from internalizing societal norms, moral values, or other external influences that dictate how one believes they ought to behave.

According to Higgins’ theory, discrepancies between the actual self and ought self can influence motivation and behavior. Individuals may feel compelled to conform to societal expectations or meet perceived obligations in order to reduce this dissonance. However, striving too far from one’s authentic desires and values in pursuit of meeting external standards can result in inner turmoil.

See Role Theory for more information on this topic

Actual (own)-Ought (other) Discrepancy

If a person possess this discrepancy the actual perception of self from their own standpoint does not match the state that the person believes some significant other considers to be their duty or obligation to obtain. In this discrepancy the individual is vulnerable to experiencing fear or feeling threatened (Higgins, 1987).

See Imposter Syndrome for more information on this topic

These are just three examples of the many possible combinations of discrepancies between domains of self and standpoint of perspective.

Magnitude of Discrepancy

We all experience these discrepancies. However, not every discrepancy creates an arousal. Several factors interact such as the magnitude of the discrepancy or the repetitive reoccurrence of a particular discrepancy. Another contributing factor is an individual’s resources and skills for regulating emotion. Consequently, with healthy emotional regulation skills, a person may navigate the negative emotions associated with a discrepancy and respond in an adaptive way.

See Emotional Regulation for more on this topic

Examples of Everyday Discrepancies

Self-discrepancies—the gaps between different aspects of our self-concept—manifest in various everyday scenarios.

Here are some examples:

Career Aspirations

• Feeling inadequate because your current achievements don’t match your professional aspirations.
• Experiencing anxiety about not meeting your own standards or societal expectations.

Social Expectations

• Struggling to balance personal desires with what others expect of you (e.g., being more responsible or outgoing).

Body Image

• Feeling dissatisfied with your physical appearance compared to an idealized image (e.g., wishing to be thinner, more muscular, or taller).

Relationships

• Desiring more closeness or intimacy in relationships but feeling distant from your ideal level of connection.

Academic Performance

• Feeling pressure to excel academically, especially when your actual grades fall short of your ideal academic self.

Remember, self-discrepancies impact emotions, self-esteem, and motivation, making them essential for personal growth and self-awareness.

Reducing Emotional Distress from Self-Discrepancies

Paul Dolan wrote that we must separate “the wheat from the chaff of your ideal self—knowing which ideals to hold and which ones to fold—is a real challenge. Ultimately, you need to consider the various ways in which your thoughts about yourself are helping and hindering you in the pursuit of happiness” (Dolan, 2014).

Dissonance naturally motivates action to resolve the conflict. Philip Zimbardo, the professor behind that conducted the infamous Stanford Prison Study, wrote that people will go to remarkable lengths “to bring discrepant beliefs and behavior into some kind of functional coherence” (Zimbardo, 2008). Basically, discrepancies motivate.

Leon Festinger explains that because dissonance is uncomfortable, “people try to reduce it by changing one or both cognitions to make them more consonant with each other” (Festinger, 2009). While discrepancies natural motivate action, the action is not always adaptive. Resolutions often involves deceptions through defenses such as moral justification and denial.

See Moral Disengagement Theory and Defense Mechanisms for more information on these topics

Adaptive Strategies

Reducing emotional distress related to self-discrepancies involves several strategies:

• Self-Acceptance: Acknowledge that everyone has discrepancies between their actual, ideal, and ought selves. Embrace imperfections as part of being human.
• Reframe Discrepancies: View discrepancies as opportunities for growth rather than failures. Consider them as motivation for positive change.
• Set Realistic Goals: Align your ideal self with achievable aspirations. Unrealistic expectations can lead to unnecessary distress.
• Self-Compassion: Treat yourself kindly when you fall short. We accomplish this through avoiding harsh self-criticism. Moreover, we practice self-compassion through patience and understanding.
• Behavioral Changes: Take concrete steps to bridge the gaps. Break down goals into manageable actions.

Remember, self-discrepancies are normal, and managing emotions around them is a lifelong process.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

As we conclude our exploration of E. Tory Higgins’ groundbreaking theory, we find ourselves at the crossroads of identity, emotion, and personal growth. The gaps between our actual, ideal, and ought selves—those intricate spaces where desires meet obligations—shape our inner landscape.

Remember that self-discrepancies are not flaws; they’re invitations to introspection and transformation. Accordingly, we should embrace the tension, honor our aspirations, and navigate the contours of our self-concept with compassion.

In this dance of contradictions, may you find harmony and resilience—the music of the authentic self.

Last Update: April 5, 2026

Associated Concepts

• Authenticity: This refers to the genuine expression of one’s thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in alignment with one’s true self. It involves the ability to act in a way that is consistent with one’s own values, beliefs, and experiences. Accordingly, one must identify and value their own view of self rather than conforming to external expectations or pressures.
• Cognitive Dissonance Theory: This term, coined by social psychologist Leon Festinger, highlights the psychological discomfort that arises when there is an inconsistency between someone’s thoughts or beliefs and their actions or other beliefs.
• Looking Glass Self: This theory, proposed by Charles Horton Cooley, suggests that a person’s self-concept is primarily formed through their perception of how others view them.
• Self-Verification Theory: This theory suggests individuals have a strong need to confirm their self-concept. This means that people seek out information and experiences that validate their self-perceptions, whether positive or negative.
• Carl Rogers’ Theory of Self: This theory emphasizes the dynamic nature of the self and the importance of congruence between the real and ideal self.
• Self-Perception Theory: This theory suggests people develop their attitudes and beliefs by observing their behavior and the context in which it occurs.
• Self-Schema: These are the cognitive frameworks that shapes our beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors about ourselves. It impacts how we perceive and interpret experiences, influencing emotional well-being.
• Personal Constructs Theory: Personal constructs are subjective beliefs used to interpret the world. Developed by George Kelly, they influence emotions, memories, and future evaluations. Kelly emphasizes personal growth through understanding and reshaping constructs.

References:

Banaji, Mahzarin R.; Greenwald, Anthony G. (2016). Blindspot: Hidden Biases of Good People. Bantam; Reprint edition. ISBN-10: 0345528433; APA Record: 2012-31920-000
(Return to Main Text)

David, Susan (2016). Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change, and Thrive in Work and Life. Avery; First Edition. ISBN-10: 1592409490
(Return to Main Text)

Dolan, Paul (2014). Happiness by Design: Change What You Do, Not How You Think. Avery. ISBN-10: 0147516307
(Return to Main Text)

Festinger, Leon; Riecken, Henry W.; Schachter, Stanley (1956/2009). When Prophecy Fails: A Social & Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the Destruction of the World. Independently published. ISBN-10: 1684226201; APA Record: 1965-01410-000
(Return to Main Text)

Higgins, E. Tory (1987). Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating Self and Affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
(Return to Main Text)

Irtelli, Floriana; Durbano, Federico; Marches, Barbara (2021). The Real Self and the Ideal Self. Psychoanalysis. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.98194
(Return to Main Text)

Mason, T.; Smith, K.; Engwall, A.; Lass, A.; Mead, M.; Sorby, M.; Bjorlie, K.; Strauman, T.; Wonderlich, S. (2019). Self-Discrepancy Theory as a Transdiagnostic Framework: A Meta-Analysis of Self-Discrepancy and Psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 145(4), 372-389. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000186
(Return to Main Text)

Lansky, Melvin R.; Morrison, Andrew. P. (1997). The Legacy of Freud’s Writings on Shame. In: Melvin R. Lansky and Andrew P. Morrison (eds.), The Widening Scope of Shame. ​Routledge; 1st edition. ISBN-10: 1317771370; DOI: 10.4324/9781315803388
(Return to Main Text)

Pascal, Blaise (1950). Pensées. ISBN-13: 978-0140446456
(Return to Main Text)

Phillips, A.; Silvia, P. (2005). Self-Awareness and the Emotional Consequences of Self-Discrepancies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 703-713. DOI: 10.1177/0146167204271559
(Return to Main Text)

Zimbardo, Philip (2008). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. ‎Random House; 1st edition. ISBN-10: 0812974441; APA Record: 2007-04177-000
(Return to Main Text)