The Power of Therapeutic Confrontation: Unleashing Healing through Honesty

Therapeutic confrontation is a powerful and transformative technique used in psychotherapy and counseling. It involves addressing thought patterns, behaviors, or emotions in a direct and honest manner, with the intention of fostering personal growth and positive change. While the term “confrontation” may sound, well, confrontational, it is an intentional and skillful way of compassionately challenging individuals to examine their beliefs and behaviors.

Rollo May wrote, “The major experiences such as birth, death, love, anxiety, guilt are not problems to be solved, but paradoxes to be confronted and acknowledged” (May, 1999, p. 67). Confrontation, whether accomplished through self-examination or through the help of an outside other, is an essential process for personal growth. However, the method in which confrontation is expressed (by self or other) is important. Harsh criticism only drives our vulnerable self back into hiding to avoid the shame.

What is Therapeutic Confrontation?

Therapeutic confrontation serves as a catalyst for self-reflection and self-awareness. It provides individuals with an opportunity to explore underlying issues, gain insight into their own experiences, and break free from self-defeating patterns. We operate in automatic mode. We react to external stimuli with protective defenses without our protection breaking the surface of awareness. Often, from an outside perspective, these automatic protections are visible. A therapist may provide feedback from this outside perspective, allowing the client to focus attention to the hidden processes at work.

Basically, therapeutic confrontation is necessary and a foundational element of therapy. Psychotherapist James Janik, specifically referring to the client’s defense of denial, explains, “The confrontation of denial… is essential in reestablishing a healthy equilibrium between the individual and the world” (Janik, 1992).

Basically, under the right conditions, and done with considerable care, a therapist may bring a client’s attention to cognitive processes that the client is overlooking. Hopefully, with gentle redirection, the process may be brought to the client’s working memory for closer examination. The primary objective of therapeutic confrontation is not to attack or criticize but rather to create a safe and supportive environment where clients can confront their own thoughts, beliefs, and actions. Basically, it is a collaborative process between the therapist and the client, based on trust, empathy, and mutual respect.

Resistance and Confrontation

A common theme in therapy is resistance. Typically, we see resistance as undesirable. However, in therapy resistance is necessary. Picture, if you will, the exercise function of a resistance band. When we pull the band beyond its pre-set length, it resists. With therapy, the goal is to stretch the client beyond pre-set thoughts, beliefs, and behaviors. Growth always occurs through resistance. A person is not a lifeless blob of clay that easily molds to the will of the therapist.

Paul Bernstein and Nemour Landaiche explain, “From the beginning through to the termination of therapy, the client is encouraged to challenge deeply held beliefs, test modified emotional responses, and experiment with unfamiliar behavior.” Consequently, they proceed writing, “The client is continually learning to expand his or her awareness of self and of the availability options for change. In this respect, the work of therapy always revolves around the resolution of resistance.” They conclude, “Without resistance, therapy cannot take place. A lack of resistance means that nothing is being encountered or worked through” (Bernstein & Landaiche, 2004).

Confrontation, in many respects, is the force used to expand the client. It is the process in therapy that creates the resistance which, consequently, leads to the possibility of client growth when the therapist employs it correctly.

The Benefits of Therapeutic Confrontation

Therapeutic confrontation can yield numerous benefits, ultimately leading to profound personal growth and transformation. Laura Moeseneder and her colleagues describe a “confronting intervention as a focus on discrepancies for which the patient may or may not be aware of” (Moeseneder. et al., 2017). Perhaps, one can call it a shot of reality to stimulate change. Moreover, confrontation brings to consciousness discrepancies in adaptive functioning.

• Increased Self-Awareness: By bringing hidden and unconscious beliefs or behaviors to the surface, therapeutic confrontation helps individuals gain a deeper understanding of themselves. It allows them to explore underlying issues and make connections between their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.
• Encouraging Personal Responsibility: Through gentle confrontation, individuals are encouraged to take ownership of their actions and choices. This process empowers them to make conscious decisions and take responsibility for their own well-being.
• Changing Unhelpful Patterns: Therapeutic confrontation can help individuals identify and challenge self-destructive patterns that may be hindering their personal growth. It enables them to break free from negative cycles and adopt healthier and more adaptive ways of thinking and behaving.
• Enhancing Communication Skills: By learning to engage in therapeutic confrontation, individuals develop effective communication skills. It enables them to express their needs, assert boundaries, and engage in healthy conflict resolution.
• Strengthening Relationships: Therapeutic confrontation facilitates open and honest communication within relationships. Moreover, it encourages individuals to express their concerns and needs, leading to deeper connections and improved conflict resolution.

The Role of the Therapist

Therapists employing therapeutic confrontation must possess the necessary skills and expertise to ensure its effectiveness. They create a safe and non-judgmental space where individuals feel comfortable exploring challenging topics. Additionally, therapists use empathy, active listening, and gentle guidance to navigate the confrontation process and facilitate meaningful self-discovery.

Bernstein and Landaiche instruct that, “Sometimes the therapist must push in order to encounter the resistance that is essential for therapy; at other times (they) must back off. Throughout the process the therapist works to maintain a steady and flexible state of interpersonal resistance and resolution” (Bernstein & Landaiche, 2004).

Dr. Lawrence Heller wrote, “Helping clients experience how they maintain dysfunctional patterns requires tact and sensitivity to each individual’s vulnerability as well as, when necessary, an element of confrontation.” Markedly, He emphasizes, “It is important that clients do not feel blamed or shamed for perpetuating patterns that were once life-saving; at the same time it is important for them to see that they are ‘actors’ recreating and acting out old survival patterns” (Heller & LaPierre, 2012).

Martha C. Nussbaum illustrates confrontation by referring to the parent child relationship. She wrote that, “When a child commits a bad act, a good family will convey to the child a clear message about the unacceptability of the act, but in a spirit of love and generosity, encouraging the child to separate the child’s basic ongoing self from the wrongful act and to think of him- or herself as capable of good in the future.” She continues, “It helps if parents model the virtues themselves, and their delicate combination of confrontation and reintegration is made more effective by the child’s own love and emulation” (Nussbaum, 2018).

Risks of Therapeutic Confrontation

One of the primary risks of therapeutic confrontation is the deterioration of the therapist client relationship. Sometimes the therapist confronts a trait, belief, or behavior that will not budge. This occurs in all relationships. A strong protective boundary in a certain area may be untouchable at the present moment. If the therapist continually pushes, the relationship begins to deteriorate. Bernstein and Landaiche refer to these as “interactional stalemates” (Bernstein & Landaiche, 2004).

Confrontation may lead defensive reactions where the client buries the unwelcome material even deeper. Confrontation that is not readily received may produce feeling of shame in the client. Instead of openness, the client furthers themselves from the therapist’s observation. This inevitably will happen. However, the skilled therapist recognizes the impasse, takes note of the circumstances and backs off until growth in other areas allows for checking this boundary again.

Associated Concepts

• Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy (AEDP): This therapy style focuses on fostering secure therapeutic relationships and processing emotional experiences, aiming for rapid emotional healing and growth. It emphasizes undoing aloneness, transformative experiences, and privileging the positive.
• Therapeutic Alliance: This refers to a collaborative and trusting relationship between a therapist and a client, essential for the success of therapy. It involves the establishment of rapport, mutual respect, and a shared understanding of the goals and tasks of therapy.
• Unconditional Positive Regard: He introduced the concept of unconditional positive regard, where the therapist accepts and supports the client without judgment, creating a safe and nurturing environment for the client.
• Motivational Interviewing: This approach incorporates the spirit of collaboration, evocation, and autonomy support, which aligns with the principles of a strong therapeutic alliance, fostering motivation and commitment to change.
• Common Factors Theory: This theory suggests that beyond specific techniques, common elements like the therapeutic alliance are key determinants of therapy’s effectiveness.
• Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT): CBT emphasizes the collaborative nature of the therapist-client relationship, where both parties work together to identify and change maladaptive thought patterns and behaviors.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

Therapeutic confrontation stands as a transformative tool in the psychotherapeutic process, enabling individuals to unlock their potential for personal growth and healing. By addressing thought patterns, behaviors, or emotions with a supportive yet honest approach, therapists help clients break free from destructive cycles that hinder their progress. This gentle but firm confrontation allows individuals to embark on a profound journey of self-discovery—one that reveals hidden truths about themselves and encourages them to confront the barriers they have built around their vulnerabilities.

It is through this courageous act of facing one’s inner struggles that clients can cultivate a deeper understanding of themselves and establish healthier pathways toward well-being.

However, it is crucial for therapists to navigate this process with care; therapeutic confrontation should never be equated with aggression or blame. Instead, it serves as an invitation for self-exploration and accountability, fostering an environment rich in empathy and support. As clients learn to embrace their own thoughts and feelings without fear of judgment, they become empowered agents of change in their lives.

Ultimately, therapeutic confrontation aims not just at highlighting discrepancies but also at nurturing self-awareness and personal responsibility—key components that pave the way for lasting positive transformation. In embracing these principles within therapy sessions, both therapist and client work collaboratively towards meaningful change, reinforcing the idea that confronting our innermost challenges can lead us toward healing and growth like never before.

Last update: July 10, 2025

References:

Bernstein, Paul; Landaiche, Nemour (2004). Resistance, counterresistance, and balance: A framework for managing the experience of impasse in psychotherapy. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 22(1), 5-19. DOI: 10.1007/BF00952338
(Return to Main Text)

Heller, Lawrence; LaPierre, Aline (2012). Healing Developmental Trauma: How Early Trauma Affects Self-Regulation, Self-Image, and the Capacity for Relationship. North Atlantic Books; 1st edition.
(Return to Main Text)

Janik, James (1992). Addressing cognitive defenses in critical incident stress. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5(3), 497-503. DOI: 10.1002/jts.2490050313
(Return to Main Text)

May, Rollo (1981/1999). Freedom and Destiny. W. W. Norton & Company.
(Return to Main Text)

Moeseneder, Laura; Figlioli, Patrick; Caspar, Franz (2017). Confronting Patients: Therapists’ Model of a Responsiveness Based Approach. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 48(2), 61-67. DOI: 10.1007/s10879-017-9371-x
(Return to Main Text)

Nussbaum, Martha C. (2018). Anger and Forgiveness: Resentment, Generosity, Justice. ‎Oxford University Press; Reprint edition.
(Return to Main Text)