The Four C Model of Creativity: A Guide to the 4 Levels of Innovation

When you hear the word “creativity,” who immediately comes to mind? For most of us, the answer is usually a historical giant like Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Albert Einstein, or Pablo Picasso. We have been conditioned to reserve the “creative” label for eminent geniuses whose groundbreaking work fundamentally revolutionizes a domain and lasts for generations. Because of this intimidating standard, it is easy to dismiss our own everyday innovations, or the sudden, exciting “Aha!” moments we experience when learning something new, as simply not making the cut.

But what if we are looking at creativity all wrong? Researchers generally agree that true creativity involves producing an idea or product that is both novel and appropriate. Strictly dividing the world into historical geniuses and “the rest of us” obscures the actual, developmental journey of how ideas grow. From the deeply personal insights of a curious beginner to the hard-earned expertise of a seasoned professional, creativity is not a magical gift bestowed upon a lucky few—it is a dynamic, lifelong trajectory.

To truly understand how human beings innovate, learn, and grow, we must look beyond the simple dichotomy of “Big” and “little” accomplishments and explore a more comprehensive, inclusive framework: the Four C Model.

Introduction: Defining the Core of Creativity

In the study of educational psychology, creativity is not a nebulous “gift” but a measurable construct defined by two essential determinants: Originality (the quality of being new, different, or innovative) and Appropriateness (the quality of being useful, relevant, or task-appropriate). These components do not merely add together; they exist in a multiplicative relationship: Creativity = Originality × Appropriateness.

In Creativity 101, James C. Kaufman notes that while definitions can vary, researchers have consistently agreed for decades on two core determinants: to be considered creative, a product or idea must be both novel (original or unexpected) and appropriate (useful or relevant to the task at hand) (Kaufman, 2016).

The Evolution of the “C” Categories

Traditionally, the psychological community utilized a narrow dichotomy to categorize creativity:

• little-c: Representing “everyday creativity,” such as a unique home-cooked meal or a clever solution to a domestic problem.
• Big-C: Representing “eminent creativity,” reserved for historical figures whose work fundamentally shifts a domain, such as Mozart or Einstein.

The foundational definition of creativity—novel and appropriate—is highly effective for evaluating tangible products, but it historically overlooked the internal process of learning. Ronald A. Beghetto, Ph.D., and James C. Kaufman, Ph.D., (2007) argued that this binary was developmentally insufficient. Specifically, the “little-c” construct was considered too broad, lumping together vastly different levels of expertise. Under the old model, a fourth-grade student creating a volcano for a science fair was placed in the same category as a noted microbiologist simply because neither had reached the level of world-renowned eminence (Kaufman, 2016, p. 18).

Vygotsky’s Influence

To establish the “mini-c” category, they drew heavily upon the developmental framework of Lev Vygotsky’s Mind in Society (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2007; Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). Vygotskian theory posits that all cognitive development begins with the “internalization or appropriation of cultural tools”—meaning that learning is never just passive copying, but rather an active, internal transformation and reorganization of incoming information (Vygotsky, 1978). By defining this internal meaning-making as the “mini-c” stage, researchers provided a way to validate the deeply personal, fragile insights of students and novices that might otherwise be dismissed by strict, real-world standards of usefulness (Beghetto & Kaufman, 2007).

By expanding the model to the Four C model of Creativity, we can better map the transition from the first spark of an idea to professional mastery and beyond.

The 4 Stages in the Four C Model of Creativity

Each of the categories inFour C Model of Creativity has unique characteristics and implications. Each of them represents a distinct level of creative expression and achievement, ranging from personal insights that spark individual growth to groundbreaking contributions that shape entire fields.

Let’s examine each of these levels in detail so we can better appreciate how creativity manifests across different contexts and what factors influence an individual’s journey along this continuum.

mini-c

Have you ever learned something completely new and felt that sudden, exciting spark of understanding? That deeply personal moment is exactly what researchers call “mini-c” creativity, which encompasses the creative interpretations inherent in the learning process (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). Unlike forms of creativity that are judged by the outside world, mini-c is entirely about your own internal, transformative learning process and is defined as a novel and personally meaningful interpretation of your experiences, actions, and events.

James C. Kaufman, Ph.D., Professor of Educational Psychology at the University of Connecticut, explains:

“In mini-c, the initial spark of creativity doesn’t have to be held up to the same standards that we use for typical everyday creativity. An idea or product doesn’t need to be new and appropriate in the opinion of another person, necessarily; it just needs to be new and appropriate to the creator at the time” (Kaufman, 2016, p. 18).

Whether you are an adult suddenly grasping a complex new concept or a fourth-grader coming up with a unique, personal theory about why Pluto isn’t a planet, that internal spark is a genuine creative act.

The Motivational Element of mini-c

Recognizing mini-c is incredibly important because it protects the fragile, emerging potential of beginners from being unfairly judged against professional or historical standards. For example, when a four-year-old decides she wants to grow up to be a “mushroom princess,” she is playfully combining two things she values in a highly creative, mini-c way. If we only looked at her idea through the strict lens of everyday innovation or historical genius, we might dismiss it entirely instead of celebrating its personal novelty.

By validating these early, intrapersonal insights, parents and teachers can actively nurture this potential and help it grow into more tangible achievements over time. After all, mini-c isn’t just for kids; it represents the curious “beginner’s mind” and the very genesis of all creative expression that every creator, no matter how famous, must experience to generate new ideas (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009).

little-c

While “mini-c” focuses on your own internal learning, “little-c” creativity is what most of us think of when we talk about everyday innovation and creative expression. It involves taking your insights and turning them into a tangible product or action that can be shared with others. You do not need to be a historical genius to participate in little-c creativity, as it is something the average person can engage in every single day.

Fun examples include creatively arranging family photos in a scrapbook, combining leftover Italian and Chinese food to invent a tasty new dish, or figuring out an inventive scheduling solution at your job (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). Even an amateur artist winning a local competition, or someone uploading a video of themselves singing to YouTube, counts as a little-c accomplishment (Kaufman, 2016).

What makes little-c so special is how it is evaluated by the outside world. Unlike professional masterworks, a little-c product only needs to be recognized as novel and useful within its specific, everyday social context. If you show a friend a painting you made, they are not going to harshly critique it by comparing your brushstrokes to Vincent van Gogh or Claude Monet (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). Instead, they will appreciate it based on what they know about your current skill level and your local environment.

Recognizing the little-c category is incredibly helpful because it shatters the intimidating myth that only a select few “geniuses” can be creative. By celebrating these everyday innovations, we can better appreciate the essential role that creativity plays in enriching our homes, schools, and workplaces.

Pro-c

Imagine you have turned your passion into your profession, dedicating years to mastering your craft. This lands you in the “Pro-c” category, which represents professional-level expertise and creative accomplishment. To reach this impressive stage, creators typically go through about ten years of intense preparation, formal training, and active experimentation.

You might think of a working jazz musician who earns a living playing gigs, a published novelist with a dedicated fan base, or a professional chef who creates innovative new entrées for a living (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). These individuals have clearly surpassed the everyday creativity of amateurs, yet they haven’t necessarily reached the immortal, history-book status of a “Big-C” genius like Albert Einstein or Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (Kaufman, 2016).

While my work here at Psychology Fanatic will never arise to the level of Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, or B. F. Skinner, I aspire for it reaching a Pro-c categorization.

Rewarding Hardworking Professionals

Having the Pro-c category is incredibly useful because it gives hardworking professionals the distinct recognition they deserve. If we only used the basic “everyday” versus “genius” labels, we would be forced to lump a seasoned, professional writer into the same group as a teenager taking their very first creative writing class, which hardly seems fair (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). At the Pro-c level, your creative products are put to the test by the “field”—a group of domain gatekeepers like critics, editors, and professional peers who evaluate whether your work meets high professional standards (Kaufman, 2016, p. 28).

Whether or not a Pro-c creator’s work ultimately stands the test of time to become a legendary Big-C contribution is up to history to decide, but their everyday reality is one of consistent, expert-level innovation.

Big-C

Finally, we arrive at the pinnacle of the Four C Model: the “Big-C” category. When we casually throw around the word “genius,” this is exactly the level of creativity we are talking about (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). Big-C represents clear-cut, eminent creative contributions that fundamentally revolutionize a field and last for generations. Think of the immortal legacies of figures like Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Jane Austen, or Albert Einstein. These are individuals whose groundbreaking work is still remembered, studied, and enjoyed hundreds of years after they created it (Kaufman, 2016, p. 17).

While many people can achieve professional success (Pro-c), reaching the Big-C level is incredibly rare and represents the ultimate peak of human creative achievement. Sometimes, reaching this level of greatness even involves what researchers call a “Faustian bargain,” where the creator sacrifices almost everything else in their personal life, including normal family relationships and leisure, to wholly pursue their monumental work (Policastro & Gardner, 1999).

The Test of Time

One of the most fascinating—and perhaps frustrating—aspects of Big-C creativity is that it is almost impossible to accurately judge in the present moment. Because true eminence is determined by how well a creation stands the test of time, evaluating whether someone has reached Big-C status most often requires a posthumous judgment.

A creator might be wildly famous and celebrated as a genius during their lifetime, but it is ultimately up to the “field”—future generations of historians, critics, and experts—to decide if their work holds immortal value or if it was simply a passing fad. So, even if a professional is doing incredible work right now, we might have to wait a century or more for history to make the final judgment and officially welcome them into the elite pantheon of Big-C geniuses (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009).

The “Kitchen Laboratory”

The Concept: The Culinary Evolution

• Mini-c (The Secret Ingredient): This is the moment you realize that adding a pinch of sea salt makes your morning oatmeal taste incredible. It’s a personal “Aha!” moment. It doesn’t change the world, but it changes your morning.
• Little-c (The Family Potluck): This is when you create a signature chili recipe that everyone asks for at the neighborhood block party. It’s “everyday” creativity—solving the problem of “what’s for dinner” in a way that brings value to your social circle.
• Pro-c (The Executive Chef): This is the person who has spent years in culinary school and professional kitchens. They have mastered the “10,000 hours” of French techniques and earn their living through their specialized expertise.
• Big-C (The Culinary Icon): This is someone like Julia Child or Auguste Escoffier. Their creativity is legendary; they didn’t just cook well—they changed the way an entire culture thinks about food and will be remembered for centuries.

The Developmental Trajectory: Navigating the Creative Path

The Four C Model views creative development as a dynamic path rather than a static state. Most creators follow a progression characterized by the following stages:

1. The mini-c Stage: This begins with early-life exploration and play. At this level, creativity is defined by “interpretive and transformative insights” (Kaufman, 2016, p. 18) that are personally meaningful to the creator, often nurtured by supportive mentors or parents.
2. The Transition to little-c: Through feedback and repeated engagement, the creator moves into “everyday” creativity. This is the realm of the hobbyist or the student who has moved beyond personal insight to produce work that others recognize as creative.
3. The Leap to Pro-c: Advancing to professional status requires the “10-year rule”—the observation that it typically takes a decade of active study and deliberate practice to learn the basics and master a domain (Kaufman, 2016, p. 81). This is where the creator acquires the expertise necessary to impact the field professionally.
4. The Path to Big-C: To reach eminence, a Pro-c creator’s work must pass the “test of time.” This final stage is determined by history; while a creator may be highly successful in their life, Big-C status is only conferred if the work remains relevant for generations.

It is crucial to emphasize that this trajectory is domain-specific. An individual can attain Pro-c status in a professional field (e.g., architecture) while remaining at a little-c level in another (e.g., gardening).

Critical Factors Influencing Growth and Recognition

The progression from a creative person to an eminent product is mediated by the environment. To understand this, we must synthesize the 4 P’s (Person, Process, Product, Press/Place) with the Systems Model.

In the Systems Model, creativity is viewed as an interaction between the Person (the creator), the Domain (the area of expertise), and the Field (the gatekeepers, such as editors, critics, and experts). The Field acts as the steward of the Domain, deciding which Products are of sufficient quality and originality to be accepted.

A prime example of this interaction is the work of J.S. Bach (Kaufman, 2016, p. 29). During his life, the Field did not believe his later work was creative within the domain of music. It was only after his death that subsequent generations of the Field (critics and musicians) recognized his brilliance, moving his work from the Pro-c level to Big-C eminence. This highlights that recognition can shift as the gatekeepers of a domain change.

Furthermore, research by Simonton confirms that quality is often a function of quantity; the most productive creators—those who produce the most significant volume of work—are generally the ones who achieve the highest peaks of quality (Kaufman, 2016, p. 20).

The Four P’s

The “Four Ps” of creativity—Person (who creates), Process (how they create), Product (what is created), and Press or Place (where and when creativity happens)—serve as a foundational framework for understanding the mechanisms of creativity (Kaufman, 2016, p. 17). When applied to the Four C Model, the interaction among these four elements shifts dynamically depending on the individual’s level of creative maturation.

mini-c (Transformative Learning)

At the mini-c stage, the primary focus is heavily on the Person and the internal cognitive Process of learning,. The Product at this level does not even need to be a physical or tangible object; it can be a completely internal mental or emotional construct known only to the creator. Because this stage is so deeply intrapersonal, the Press (the surrounding environment) plays a critical role in nurturing these fragile insights. A supportive press—such as parents and teachers who encourage curiosity and respect children’s opinions—is essential to help this creative potential grow rather than allowing it to be dismissed or lost (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009).

little-c (Everyday Innovation)

As creativity develops into the little-c category, the emphasis shifts from the internal process of interpretation toward a tangible Product (creative expression). The Person creates an idea or object that interacts with an everyday Press, such as a local community, workplace, or peer group. At this level, the product is evaluated as novel and useful based on the specific social context and standards of that immediate environment, rather than being compared to professional or historical masterworks (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009).

Pro-c (Professional Expertise)

Reaching the Pro-c level requires the Person to undergo a rigorous, developmental Process, which typically involves about 10 years of intensive preparation, training, and active experimentation. The Product now interacts with a highly specialized Press known as the “field”. This field is made up of domain gatekeepers—such as critics, editors, and other professional peers—who evaluate the product to determine if it meets professional standards and contributes meaningfully to the domain Kaufman, 2016, p. 28).

Big-C (Eminent Accomplishments)

At the highest level of Big-C, the Product achieves a level of clear-cut greatness that revolutionizes a domain, but this status is ultimately decided by the macro-level Press over a vast period of time,. Historians and the field evaluate the work across generations to judge if it possesses immortal value. Consequently, the Person who engaged in the creative Process may have already passed away before the historical Press officially recognizes their work as Big-C eminence (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009).

In summary, as an individual progresses through the Four C Model, the focal point of their creativity moves from internal dimensions (Person and Process) to external dimensions (Product and Press). While mini-c relies on internal meaning-making and a nurturing immediate environment, Pro-c and Big-C rely heavily on tangible products withstanding the intense scrutiny of professional gatekeepers and the test of time.

How to Develop Your Creativity: Navigating the Four C Model Stages

Progressing through the Four C Model—from the initial, personal sparks of mini-c to the world-changing impacts of Big-C—is rarely an automatic journey. It requires a dynamic interplay of internal fortitude, emotional resilience, and external guidance. Transitioning from the everyday innovations of little-c to the specialized expertise of Pro-c demands roughly a decade of deliberate practice and active exploration (Kaufman, 2016, p. 81; Kaufman & Beghetto, 2009). To successfully navigate these developmental stages, a creator cannot rely on talent alone; they must cultivate a specific set of psychological qualities and draw upon the nurturing environments around them to sustain their vision over time (Feldman, 1999).

Creative Courage and Risk-Taking

Drawing upon Rollo May’s The Courage to Create, advancing to higher levels of creativity requires the courage to move forward in spite of anxiety, disorientation, or despair. May argues that creative courage involves stepping into the unknown, confronting the “anxiety of nothingness,” and risking censure or rejection to express new, vanguard visions (May, 1994). Furthermore, a creator must maintain a dialectic balance: they must be deeply committed and centered in their work, yet simultaneously aware that they might possibly be wrong.

See Courage to Change for more on this topic

Creative Self-efficacy

A creator must firmly believe in their own capability to handle creative challenges and successfully execute complex tasks. This strong creative self-concept acts as a crucial mediator between a person’s raw creative potential and their actual creative achievements. High self-efficacy provides the necessary resilience to deal with failure, overcome inevitable obstacles, and sustain the intense motivation required to reach the Pro-c and Big-C levels.

Albert Bandura posits that the strength of people’s convictions in “their own effectiveness is likely to affect whether they will even try to cope with given situations” (Bandura 1977, p. 193).

Successfully developing creativity from the small budding beginning of mini-C to the beautiful blooming flowering of Pro-c requires a belief that we have the potential to achieve this growth.

See Self-Efficacy for more on this topic

Scaffolding of Others

No creator evolves in a total vacuum.

Lev S. Vygotsky wrote:

“Experience has shown that the child with the larger zone of proximal development will do much better in school. This measure gives a more helpful clue than mental age does to the dynamics of intellectual progress” (Vygotsky, 1962).

At the fragile mini-c and little-c stages, parents, teachers, and mentors must provide what researchers call the “Goldilocks Principle” of feedback—responses that are neither too harsh (which crushes the idea) nor falsely praising (which stunts growth), but perfectly tailored to help the beginner improve their craft. As a creator advances toward Pro-c and Big-C, this scaffolding transforms into essential cognitive and affective support from domain mentors and peers, which is critical during periods of intense breakthrough and isolation.

See Zone of Proximal Development for more on this topic

Intrinsic Joy and Passion

The drive to create must ultimately originate from within. Rollo May notes that during the intense absorption of the creative act, the artist or scientist experiences joy—defined as the heightened consciousness and mood that accompanies actualizing one’s own potential (May, 1994). This deep, intrinsic motivation is what sustains a creator through the rigorous years of preparation necessary to master a domain and push its boundaries.

See Passion and Purpose for more on this topic

The Experience of Flow

Coined by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, “flow” is a state of deep, optimal involvement that occurs when a creator’s skills are perfectly balanced with a manageable challenge (Csikszentmihalyi, 2008). During this state, an individual is completely focused, goals are clear, and feedback is immediate. Because the task demands their total psychic energy, self-consciousness disappears, and their sense of time becomes distorted (Csikszentmihalyi, 1998).

Flow acts as a powerful “magnet for learning” because it naturally encourages creators to continually seek out and develop new, more complex levels of challenges and skills (Csikszentmihalyi, 1998). By consistently investing their energy into activities that produce this state of flow, a creator fosters the necessary growth in consciousness and skill required to progress to higher levels of creative mastery.

Applying the Four C Model Across Disciplines

Because the Four C Model provides such a robust framework for understanding creative maturation, it has proven highly adaptable to fields outside of standard psychology. For instance, in the paper “Illuminating Information Creating,” Leslie Thomson uses the Four C Model as a lens to study how people seek and generate information within the field of Information and Library Science (ILS) (Thompson, 2018). Thomson successfully maps ILS research onto the Four Cs to categorize different behaviors:

• mini-c: Students seeking information and tinkering with media to create something that is new and coherent to themselves.
• little-c: Hobbyists engaging in leisure pursuits—such as genealogy, knitting, or food blogging—where information is created for personal joy, transformation, or identity-building.
• Pro-c: The day-to-day drafting, note-taking, and professional “crafting” behaviors of scholars and knowledge workers (Thompson, 2018)..

By providing a structured spectrum of creative output, the Four C Model allows researchers in diverse fields to aggregate their data, identify gaps in their literature, and better understand the complete lifecycle of how human beings innovate.

Do People Actually Recognize the Four Cs?

While theorists clearly delineate these four stages, an interesting question arises: how does the general public perceive them? In the study “Do People Recognize the Four Cs?”, researchers asked college students to evaluate descriptions of creative acts.

The results showed that laypeople do not just view creativity as a simple “you have it or you don’t” binary; they actively recognize hierarchical levels of creative development. Interestingly, while participants easily distinguished Big-C (eminent), mini-c (personal), and non-creative behaviors, they tended to blur the lines between little-c and Pro-c, viewing everyday creativity and professional expertise as overlapping categories.

Furthermore, the study revealed that personality plays a role in how we value creativity: individuals who score higher in “openness to experience” and “agreeableness” were significantly more likely to recognize and appreciate the nuanced, subjective nature of mini-c creativity (Kaufman & Beghetto, 2013).

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

In exploring the Four C Model of Creativity, we’ve journeyed through a nuanced landscape that challenges the traditional notions of creativity as merely an innate gift. Instead, we’ve seen how it embodies a dynamic interplay of originality and appropriateness across various stages—from the personal epiphanies of mini-c to the monumental achievements recognized as big-C. This framework not only enriches our understanding but also empowers us to nurture creativity in ourselves and others by recognizing where we stand on this continuum.

As we wrap up our exploration, it’s clear that fostering creativity is essential for both individual growth and collective innovation. Just like emotional flooding can spark new ideas amidst chaos, embracing these creative levels opens doors to fresh perspectives in everyday life. So whether you’re an educator looking to inspire your students or simply someone seeking to ignite your own creative potential, remember that every little step counts on this remarkable journey. Embrace your unique path within the Four C Model, and let your creative spirit flourish!

Last Edited: March 21, 2026

Associated Concepts

• Achievement Goal Theory: This theory provides a psychological framework to measure the effectiveness of goals. It posits that an individual’s beliefs about their abilities and the motivations behind their actions shape their behavior.
• Creativity: The ability to generate original ideas, solutions, or expressions through imaginative thinking and originality. It involves using inventive and unconventional approaches to problem-solving. It also includes creating new and unique works or concepts in various domains such as art, science, and literature.
• Self-Actualization: Abraham Maslow’s concept of self-actualization, which refers to the realization of one’s potential and the pursuit of personal growth.
• Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Theory of Intelligence: This theory proposes a hierarchical model of intelligence with three strata. It is the most widely accepted and empirically supported psychometric theory of cognitive abilities.
• Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory of Intelligence: This theory suggests that intelligence is not a single, unified entity. Instead, it comprises three distinct yet interconnected aspects. These are Analytical Intelligence, Creative Intelligence, and Practical Intelligence. 
• Experiential Learning Theory: This theory, developed by psychologist David Kolb, is a learning model that emphasizes the importance of learning through experience. This theory suggests that individuals learn best when they actively engage in experiences and reflect on them.
• McClelland’s Three Needs Theory: This theory proposes that three primary needs motivate production and success in individuals. These needs are: the need for achievement, the need for affiliation, and the need for power. McClelland’s theory suggests that understanding which need is most dominant in an individual can help predict their behavior and motivation in various situations.

References:

Bandura, Albert (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
(Return to Main Text)

Beghetto, R. A.; Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
(Return to Main Text)

Boden, Margaret A. (1996). What is Creativity? In: Margaret A. Boden (ed.), Dimensions of Creativity. MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262522199; APA Reference: 1994-98198-000
(Return to Main Text)

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1998). Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life (Masterminds Series). Basic Books. ISBN: 0465024114; APA Record: 1997-08434-000

Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2008). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (Harper Perennial Modern Classics). HarperCollins e-books; 1st edition. ISBN: 0061339202
(Return to Main Text)

Feldman, David Henry (1999). The Development of Creativity. In: Robert J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521576048; APA Record: 1998-08125-000
(Return to Main Text)

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1037/a0013688
(Return to Main Text)

Kaufman, J.; Beghetto, R. (2013). Do People Recognize the Four Cs? Examining Layperson Conceptions of Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229-236. DOI: 10.1037/a0033295
(Return to Main Text)

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity 4in1: Four-Criterion Construct of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338-352. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2014.929424
(Return to Main Text)

May, Rollo (1994). The Courage to Create. W. W. Norton & Company; Revised ed. edition. ISBN: 978-0-393-31106-8; APA Record: 1976-26086-000
(Return to Main Text)

Policastro, Emma; Gardner, Howard (1999). From Case Studies to Robust Generalizations: An Approach to the Study of Creativity. In: Robert J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521576048; APA Record: 1998-08125-000
(Return to Main Text)

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office creativity criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.
(Return to Main Text)

Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83-100. DOI: 10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.83
(Return to Main Text)

Thompson, Leslie (2018). Illuminating Information Creating: Using the “Four C” Model of Creativity as a Lens for ILS. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/cais1035
(Return to Main Text)

Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674576292; APA Record: 1979-28227-000
(Return to Main Text)

Vygotsky, Lev S. (1962/2012). Thought and language. MIT Press; Expanded edition. ISBN: 9781614272441; APA Record: 2006-10268-000