A person returns to the piano after years away. The first attempts are awkward, and there is no audience to impress. Yet something in the work feels worth continuing. Later, the music stops for dinner, a conversation, and sleep. A meaningful activity has found a place within an ordinary day.

Self-actualization concerns how people develop and express their capacities. Abraham Maslow made this possibility central to his account of human motivation. His work invites us to consider what gives a life meaning through the abilities we use, while recognizing the needs and circumstances that make development possible (Maslow, 1943, 1968).

What Is Self-Actualization

For Maslow, fulfilling one’s potential takes a form particular to the person. Self-actualization involves becoming more fully able to live out one’s abilities and commitments. The same account of growth need not produce the same occupation, personality, or way of life (Maslow, 1943, 1970).

Maslow used the term both for movement toward fulfillment and for people he regarded as unusually developed. A worthwhile activity does not, by itself, establish that someone has reached a lasting state of psychological health. Maslow also recognized that describing self-actualization as a final condition could obscure the growth taking place throughout life (Maslow, 1968).

The Humanistic Roots of the Idea

Maslow did not invent the term self-actualization. In his 1943 paper, he credited Kurt Goldstein and explained that he was using the concept in a more specific sense. Within humanistic psychology, Maslow’s distinctive contribution was to ask what might be learned by studying people whose capacities appeared to be developing well. This expanded the questions psychology could ask about human life, while leaving open the difficult question of how healthy development should be defined (Maslow, 1943, 1970).

Carl Rogers offered a related perspective through his account of the fully functioning person. He described the good life as a continuing process involving greater openness to experience. Rogers’s formulation and Maslow’s theory have a family resemblance, but they are not identical. Together they help explain why humanistic psychology attends to becoming, as well as to the relief of distress (Rogers, 1961/1995).

Self-Actualization and the Hierarchy of Needs

The familiar hierarchy places physiological needs, safety, love and belonging, and esteem before self-actualization. Maslow proposed that pressing unmet needs tend to command attention. Someone preoccupied with obtaining food or finding safety may have little freedom to pursue other aims. Yet he also described exceptions, multiple motives operating together, and people whose needs were partly satisfied and partly unsatisfied at the same time (Maslow, 1943).

The pyramid makes these relationships look tidier than Maslow’s writing warrants. Historical research found that Maslow did not create the pyramid used to represent his theory; its familiar form developed through later presentations in management education. The image can be a useful memory aid, but it encourages a mistaken impression when each level appears to be a stage that must be completed and left behind (Bridgman et al., 2019).

An international study helps clarify how needs overlap. Tay and Diener examined need fulfillment and well-being across 123 countries. Fulfilling a particular need was often linked with well-being even when other needs remained unmet. Relationships and respect could matter alongside continuing material hardship. The study examined people’s needs and experiences of well-being, however, rather than measuring self-actualization directly (Tay & Diener, 2011).

The person practicing the piano still needs food, companionship, and rest. Attending to those needs does not erase the significance of the music. Maslow’s discussion of partial satisfaction makes room for this coexistence. It also prevents us from treating material security as a guarantee of fulfillment: having room to develop a capacity and actually developing it are different matters (Maslow, 1943, 1968).

The Motivations and Tensions of Growth

Deficiency Motivation and Growth Motivation

Maslow distinguished motivation directed toward meeting a lack from motivation expressed in growth. Hunger provides an accessible example of the first pattern: eating can reduce the immediate demand. Learning offers an example of the second: gaining understanding may make us want to explore further. Growth can therefore deepen our involvement in an activity rather than simply remove a discomfort (Maslow, 1968).

The distinction concerns the meaning of an activity, not merely its outward appearance. Two people might pursue the same qualification, one chiefly to protect a fragile sense of worth and another because the subject has become deeply engaging. A single person may experience both motives. In this context, growth motivation directs attention to how an activity expresses developing interests and abilities (Maslow, 1968).

Self-determination theory provides a related, more differentiated account of motivation. Deci and Ryan described intrinsic motivation, in which an activity carries its own interest, as well as the process of coming to endorse activities that are not initially enjoyable (Deci & Ryan, 1985). This matters because a meaningful life also contains effort and obligation. Caring for someone, practicing a difficult skill, or completing necessary work need not feel pleasant at every moment to be personally valued.

Why Personal Growth Can Feel Threatening

The wish to develop can coexist with the wish to remain where life feels familiar. In his discussion of defense and growth, Maslow described competing tendencies toward exploration and protection from threat. A possibility may attract us while also disturbing an established sense of competence or belonging. His account helps explain why wanting change does not always make the next step easy (Maslow, 1968).

Returning to the piano, for example, may mean hearing how much skill has faded. A person can miss the music and still hesitate to encounter that disappointment. A patient teacher or a manageable first session might make exploration more inviting. This illustrates the tension Maslow described between the appeal of a new experience and the threat it carries.

Safety has a constructive place in this account. Maslow argued that feeling secure could free a person to explore (Maslow, 1968). Hesitation therefore deserves understanding: protecting housing, health, or a dependable relationship can be a reasonable priority. The practical inability to pursue an interest should not be mistaken for an unwillingness to grow.

How Maslow Described Self-Actualizing People

Maslow’s portrait of self-actualizing people brings together several qualities he associated with fuller development. These are proposed characteristics to consider, rather than a checklist for ranking ourselves or others (Maslow, 1970).

Acceptance With Room for Change

Acceptance did not mean that Maslow’s subjects were flawless or indifferent to their shortcomings. He explicitly rejected perfection as a workable criterion. His account allowed people to recognize their ordinary human needs while remaining concerned about behavior that hurt others or fell short of their values (Maslow, 1970). Acknowledging a limitation can make it more available for attention; it need not become a verdict against the whole person.

Openness to Experience

Another feature was a willingness to encounter what was unfamiliar or uncertain. Maslow believed that the people he studied were less compelled to force experience into reassuring categories (Maslow, 1970). This remains a useful aspiration, provided we do not confuse confidence in our perceptions with accuracy. Being open includes allowing experience to challenge an interpretation we would prefer to keep.

Everyday Creativity and Freshness of Appreciation

Maslow came to distinguish creativity from exceptional talent or a prestigious creative occupation. He found inventiveness in ordinary work, caregiving, and the ways people approached a particular problem. In this sense, creativity concerns the quality of engagement: bringing attention and imagination to what is actually before us. Playing an instrument offers one possibility, but the same spirit can enter a meal, a garden, or a conversation (Maslow, 1968).

He also described a freshness of appreciation, through which familiar experiences could still evoke pleasure or wonder. At greater intensity, he discussed peak experiences involving awe, absorption, or an unusual sense of significance. These moments were not continuous, and he did not report them in everyone he regarded as self-actualizing (Maslow, 1970). Their place in the theory leaves room for the quieter experience of hearing something new in a familiar piece of music.

A Life That Extends Beyond the Self

The word self can make self-actualization sound inward-looking. Yet Maslow described people absorbed in work, responsibilities, and concerns that reached beyond personal advantage. He also emphasized identification with other people and concern for humanity. In this account, developing a capacity may draw us more deeply into the world: an ability becomes something through which we can contribute, understand, or care (Maslow, 1970).

Research on Self-Actualization

Maslow’s original research cannot establish a universal sequence of development. He selected acquaintances and historical figures partly because they appeared to fit his developing idea of psychological health. He acknowledged the limits of his sample, gaps in the information available, and difficulties with reliable assessment (Maslow, 1970). Selecting people because they seem healthy makes it difficult to determine whether the qualities found in them reflect a broader pattern or the researcher’s initial expectations.

More recent research has made aspects of the concept measurable. Scott Barry Kaufman developed a 30-item Characteristics of Self-Actualization Scale and examined it in an online sample of 522 adults. Higher scores were associated with greater life satisfaction and several dimensions of psychological well-being, including personal growth, self-acceptance, and positive relationships (Kaufman, 2023). The findings do not establish that self-actualization causes well-being. Questionnaires can also ask about overlapping qualities, so similar answers alone cannot confirm a separate final stage of development.

A related line of research examines ego development, or the increasingly complex ways people understand themselves and others. Bauer and colleagues looked again at three earlier datasets and found preliminary evidence that people scoring at the highest levels also reported greater well-being. Very few participants scored at those levels, however, and the samples were not representative of the wider population. The findings warrant further study rather than a firm conclusion about a final stage of growth (Bauer et al., 2011).

Carol Ryff’s account of psychological well-being distinguishes several dimensions of positive functioning, including purpose, personal growth, self-acceptance, and positive relationships (Ryff, 1989). This framework gives us a broader vocabulary for discussing fulfillment than happiness alone. It invites us to consider a developing ability or a sense of direction alongside the feelings that accompany daily life.

Bauer and colleagues also explored two reasons people seek growth: wanting to understand life more deeply, and wanting to take part in meaningful activities and relationships. They called these reflective and experiential growth motivation. Across five studies, the wish for deeper understanding was more closely linked with mature ways of thinking about oneself and others. The desire for meaningful experiences was more closely linked with well-being. Both were related to self-actualization scores. Because the researchers studied U.S. college students without following their development over time, the findings show connections, not how people change as they grow (Bauer et al., 2015).

These findings suggest that growth is worth considering from more than one angle. We can ask how a person understands their life as well as whether their activities and relationships feel meaningful. A single judgment about whether someone is flourishing may overlook these differences.

Research tools also reflect choices about what counts as a good life. Bauer and colleagues acknowledge that their account of growth is shaped by cultural values and that their student samples cannot establish a universal pattern (Bauer et al., 2015). The wider challenge is to study development without making one preferred form of independence, achievement, or maturity the standard for every life.

Self-Actualization in Everyday Life

The question becomes more useful when brought back to a particular life: what gives a capacity room to develop, and what does its development make possible? The answers include the conditions around us and the people with whom our lives are shared.

Conditions That Support Growth

The conditions surrounding a person deserve as much attention as the person’s resolve. Tay and Diener found that the fulfillment of needs in a society was associated with individual well-being beyond the fulfillment of a person’s own needs (Tay & Diener, 2011). Opportunities for development are poorly understood when reduced to discipline or attitude alone.

For the person returning to music, room to develop might depend on time free from competing demands. For someone else, it may require dependable care or access to education. These examples give a more concrete meaning to the invitation to pursue potential: people need opportunities in which to use their abilities.

There is also room to revise what fulfillment looks like. An earlier ambition may no longer fit our abilities, commitments, or circumstances. Rogers’s emphasis on openness suggests a way of approaching such change: experience remains something to learn from, rather than something that must continually confirm an established picture of the self. Development can involve a more honest relationship with our limits as well as a fuller use of our strengths (Rogers, 1961/1995).

Growth Through Relationships and Contribution

Developing a capacity can change what we bring to other people. Maslow’s emphasis on concerns beyond the self suggests that fulfillment may deepen through work, care, or a shared undertaking (Maslow, 1970). The pianist might become more able to listen to another musician, offer encouragement, or share music without making the encounter a test of personal worth.

Research on the quiet ego explores how people can value themselves while also caring about others. Wayment and colleagues developed a questionnaire about paying attention to the present, feeling connected to others, considering their perspectives, and being open to growth. Higher scores were linked with several signs of well-being. Most participants were students, however, and the studies could not establish whether developing these qualities improves well-being. The quiet ego offers a useful comparison with Maslow’s ideas, but the questionnaire measures a different concept (Wayment et al., 2015).

Concern for another person can express our values while leaving our own needs worthy of attention. A meaningful responsibility is different from an imposed role that allows no room for our choices or limits. The quiet-ego framework and self-determination theory offer complementary ways to consider this balance: how an activity serves others and whether the person freely values taking part in it (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Wayment et al., 2015).

Becoming more fully ourselves may involve less preoccupation with proving ourselves. The musical phrase, the person listening, or the shared work can become interesting in its own right. Read together, Maslow’s account and the quiet-ego framework invite us to understand growth through our changing engagement with the world, including what we can contribute to it (Maslow, 1970; Wayment et al., 2015).

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

The person at the piano will not finish becoming when the piece is finally played well. Tomorrow, the same passage may sound different. A mistake that once felt embarrassing may invite closer listening, or a familiar phrase may become something worth sharing.

There will still be evenings when the music has to wait. The instrument can remain part of the room, ready when there is time and attention to return. Perhaps there is something useful in that modest scene: a capacity being cared for within a life that is still unfolding.

Associated Concepts

• Humanistic Psychology: A psychological perspective emphasizing personal experience, human potential, and the capacity for growth. Self-actualization is central to Maslow’s contribution to this tradition (Maslow, 1968).
• Growth Motivation: The desire to develop capacities, deepen understanding, and participate in meaningful experiences. It connects self-actualization with the motives that draw people toward fuller engagement with life (Maslow, 1968; Bauer et al., 2015).
• Self-Determination Theory: A theory examining motivation and the conditions that support autonomy, competence, and relatedness. It offers a complementary account of how people pursue activities they find interesting or personally meaningful (Deci & Ryan, 1985).
• Self-Acceptance: Recognizing one’s strengths and limitations without making personal worth depend on perfection. In Maslow’s account, acceptance remains compatible with responsibility and continued development (Maslow, 1970).
• Ego Development: Changes in the complexity of how people understand themselves, others, and their experiences. Research on ego development offers a related perspective on psychological maturity, while remaining distinct from Maslow’s theory of self-actualization (Bauer et al., 2011).
• Quiet Ego: A way of understanding the self that balances concern for oneself with concern for others. Its emphasis on perspective-taking and growth complements the article’s discussion of fulfillment through relationships and contribution (Wayment et al., 2015).

References

Bauer, Jack J.; Park, Sun W.; Montoya, R. Matthew; Wayment, Heidi A. (2015). Growth Motivation toward Two Paths of Eudaimonic Self-Development. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 185–210. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-014-9504-9.
(Return to Main Text)

Bauer, Jack J.; Schwab, Joseph R.; McAdams, Dan P. (2011). Self-Actualizing: Where Ego Development Finally Feels Good? The Humanistic Psychologist, 39(2), 121–136. DOI: 10.1080/08873267.2011.564978.
(Return to Main Text)

Bridgman, Todd; Cummings, Stephen; Ballard, John (2019). Who Built Maslow’s Pyramid? A History of the Creation of Management Studies’ Most Famous Symbol and Its Implications for Management Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(1), 81–98. DOI: 10.5465/amle.2017.0351.
(Return to Main Text)

Deci, Edward L.; Ryan, Richard M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press. ISBN: 9780306420221.
(Return to Main Text)

Kaufman, Scott Barry (2023). Self-Actualizing People in the 21st Century: Integration with Contemporary Theory and Research on Personality and Well-Being. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 63(1), 51–83. First published online in 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0022167818809187.
(Return to Main Text)

Maslow, Abraham H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. DOI: 10.1037/h0054346.
(Return to Main Text)

Maslow, Abraham H. (1968). Toward a Psychology of Being. Second edition; 1982 reprint. Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN: 9780442051525.
(Return to Main Text)

Maslow, Abraham H. (1970). Motivation and Personality. Second edition. Harper & Row. ISBN: 9780060442415.
(Return to Main Text)

Rogers, Carl R. (1995). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin. Original work published 1961. ISBN: 9780395755310.
(Return to Main Text)

Ryff, Carol D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
(Return to Main Text)

Tay, Louis; Diener, Ed (2011). Needs and Subjective Well-Being around the World. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354–365. DOI: 10.1037/a0023779.
(Return to Main Text)

Wayment, Heidi A.; Bauer, Jack J.; Sylaska, Kateryna (2015). The Quiet Ego Scale: Measuring the Compassionate Self-Identity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(4), 999–1033. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-014-9546-z.
(Return to Main Text)