Malevolent Creativity: Unleashing Dark Artistic Potential

We usually see creativity as a positive trait. Experts in happiness and psychology encourage the growth of creativity. Life can get complex with various problems. Quick an easy reactions often relieve the anxiety of complexity. However, ready-made solutions don’t always work for unexpected challenges. That’s when creativity becomes important. Creative individuals can discover fresh and distinct solutions to different problems. They think outside the box, discover new pathways, and create innovative approaches. However, like other personality characteristics, creativity also has a negative side. In psychology, we call this negative creativity “malevolent creativity” or the darker aspect of creativity.

With all the praises we sing to creativity, secretly we don’t like it. At least not in others. Looking at a fine piece of art at a museum is one thing, but when creativity is used in everyday life by others it flaunts social norms, leaving us surprised and adjusting to the unpredicted behavior. For example, one study found that “teachers said they liked creative students–yet when asked to define creativity they used words such as ‘well-behaved’ or ‘conforming.’” Perhaps, these teachers envisioned creativity as those students that colored neatly between the lines, using the predefined selection of colors provided by the teacher. Of course, this isn’t creativity at all. These students may skillfully, and in some cases, magnificently compete assignments. But they are performing as directed.

However, in this same study, when the teachers were given “adjectives that were typically used more to describe creative people, they said they disliked these types of students” (Cropley et al., 2014). Perhaps, there is more to creativity than we normally attribute to this defining quality.

Definition of Creativity

Many early philosophers and psychologists posited that creativity consisted of two necessary elements.

These are:

1. Novel
2. Valuable (Pearson, 2020).

---

All definitions typically contain the novel aspect. However, without the value aspect, we could define any nonsensical gibberish as creative. Or as Immanuel Kant explains originality can also produce “original nonsense” (Kant, 2011). We typically don’t ascribe valueless originality as creative. Value is a subjective term. What one person values is not necessarily of value to another person. To address the vagueness of value, many philosophers have introduced the aspect of functionality in its place.

Ning Hao et al., defines:

“Creativity focuses on the originality and appropriateness of people’s creative products and ability to generate novel and effective ideas” (Hao, et al., 2016).

Basically, creativity is when you come up with new and unique ideas that have a useful purpose in achieving a goal. This definition allows for both positive creativity and as well as a darker kind of creativity—malevolent creativity.

See Creativity: A Character Trait for more on this topic

Creativity and Rebellion

Inherent in any creative act is a form of rebellion against generally accepted rules. Rollo May (1909-1994), an influential existential psychologist, wrote:

“Creativity and originality are associated with persons who do not fit into their culture.”

He later adds that we cannot “escape our anxiety over the fact that the artists together with creative persons of all sorts, are the possible destroyers of our nicely ordered systems” (May,1994).

In another book, May explains that the essential characteristic of a creative contribution is that it “transcends prior experience and contains a revolt against it” (May, 1999). Creativity is an expression of rejection of the structured norms, opening opportunity to implement something novel. Some of our greatest human achievements come by means of revolting against the current norm and implementing something new.

So, while creativity has power to create good, it also may fight against protective structures that may have a moral and ethical purpose. Not all structure of norms are bad. Some norms are basic rules of society. For example, when a married couple can’t get along, they get a divorce or live separately. Purpose, a planned, calculating murder designed to escape the confines of the marital bond is a creative skirting of societal rules and structure.

Negative Behaviors and Creative Personalities

Interestingly, many studies have found negative behaviors associated with creative personalities. “different studies have shown that creative people are more likely to manipulate test results, be able to tell more different types of creative lies than less creative people, be deceptive during conflict negotiation, and demonstrate less integrity (Cropley et al., 2014). May brings to our attention that creativity is “certainly associated with serious psychological problems in our particular culture—Van Gogh went psychotic, Gauguin seems to have been schizoid, Poe was alcoholic, and Virginia Woolf was seriously depressed” (May,1994).

Carl Rogers also noted that creativity may have both positive and negative purposes (Hao et al., 2016).

Definition of Malevolent Creativity

Malevolent creativity “denotes the utilization of creative thinking ability for the pursuit of malicious, antisocial, and destructive goals” (Perchtold-Stefan et al., 2022). Intentions are key. For us to consider a novel behavior as malevolent creativity, there must be an underlying malicious, antisocial or destructive goal. This is vastly different than a negative outcome as a consequence of a creative behavior.

Early research focused on wide-scale malevolent creativity, such as terrorism, genocide, and torture. However, malevolent creativity is often found in all people on a much smaller scale. Psychologists often refer to this as everyday malevolent creativity.

The Difference Between Negative Creativity and Malevolent Creativity

The literature makes a clear distinction between negative creativity and malevolent creativity. While they often overlap and coexist, the definitions are distinct. Negative creativity is the use of “creative processes to achieve negative goals, but without the intention of intentional harm” (Dou et al., 2022). While harm to others may not bother the person utilizing negative creativity in pursuit, the harm is not the goal in and of itself. Perhaps, power or money is the goal while harm to others is just an acceptable path while they pursue these goals.

Defense Mechanisms and Creativity

Interesting research findings discovered evidence that “threatening stimuli provoked more creative responses than non-threatening stimuli.” The researchers argued that “these types of threats can invoke disequilibrium and creativity can help reduce such cognitive dissonance” (Cropley et al., 2014).

This aspect of creativity is of particular interest to the tone of the Psychology Fanatic project since the core focus of my research is on emotional arousal, homeostasis, emotional regulation, and defense mechanisms. We can use creativity to regulate arousal, either through conscious healthy means, or through negative unconscious processes. Sometimes we may even sprinkle our emotional regulation with a dose of everyday malevolent creativity. We may actually enjoy the pain we dispatch through well-timed and pointed passive-aggressive remarks. Or, perhaps, retaliate in complex and calculating behaviors that we design with the intent to cause harm.

Many seemingly harmless people have devised and executed elaborate schemes of hurt through malevolent creative campaigns on the internet directed to destroy a designated target.

Creativity may also apply to defensive deceptions and excuses. A highly creative self deception may alleviate cognitive dissonance, allowing for ignorant bliss in continuing maladaptive behaviors.

Related Concepts

• AMORAL Model: This model emphasizes the connection between an individual’s belief system and malevolent creativity, suggesting that personal beliefs about justice and morality can influence the development of malevolent creativity.
• Belief in a Just World Theory (BJW): This theory posits that people need to believe the world is just and everyone gets what they deserve. Justice sensitivity, a trait related to BJW, has been found to associate with negative goals and could affect malevolent creativity.
• Intergroup Threat: The theory suggests that perceived threats from other groups can stimulate malevolent creativity as a form of aggression or defense mechanism.
• Social Information Processing Theory: This theory explains how the social information available from one’s environment shapes attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions, which can influence malevolent creativity.
• Life History Theory: It provides a framework for understanding how early life experiences, particularly adverse ones, can impact an individual’s development, including the propensity for malevolent creativity.
• Personality Traits: Research has explored the relationship between maladaptive personality traits and malevolent creativity, suggesting that certain personality characteristics may predispose individuals to engage in malevolent creative acts.
• Emotion Regulation: The ability to regulate emotions has been found to moderate the relationship between traits like justice sensitivity and malevolent creativity.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

Creativity is a trait or skill. We can utilize creativity to accomplish great feats and navigate this complex life. However, we are reminded of the dual nature of human ingenuity. Creativity, often celebrated as a force for good, harbors a shadow side that can weave intricate webs of deceit and orchestrate acts of harm. Malevolent creativity is a testament to the complexity of the human mind, capable of brilliance and darkness in equal measure.

Yet, understanding this darker aspect of creativity is not an exercise in despair but a call to vigilance. It challenges us to recognize the potential for misuse and to foster ethical frameworks that guide our creative impulses towards constructive ends. As we step back into the light, let us carry with us the knowledge that creativity’s greatest power lies not in its ability to destroy but in its infinite capacity to enrich, heal, and transform our world.

May we choose to direct our creative energies to build rather than to break, to unite rather than to divide, and to inspire rather than to intimidate. In the dance of creation, let our steps be guided by the compass of compassion, and let our legacy be defined by the art of benevolence.

Last Update: February 2, 2026

References:

Cropley, D., Kaufman, J., White, A., & Chiera, B. (2014). Layperson Perceptions of Malevolent Creativity: The Good, the Bad, and the Ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 400-412. DOI: 10.1037/a0037792
(Return to Main Text)

Dou, Xinyu, Dou, Xinyan, Jia, Lin, & , (2022). Interactive Association of Negative Creative Thinking and Malevolent Creative Thinking. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939672
(Return to Main Text)

Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., & Runco, M. (2016). A New Tool to Measure Malevolent Creativity: The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682
(Return to Main Text)

Jia Xuji, Wang Qingjin, Lin Lin (2020). The Relationship Between Childhood Neglect and Malevolent Creativity: The Mediating Effect of the Dark Triad Personality. Frontiers in Psychology: Volume 11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613695
(Return to Main Text)

Kant, Immanuel (1790/2011). Critique of Judgment. ‎Hackett Publishing Co.; 1st edition. ISBN: 9780872200258
(Return to Main Text)

May, Rollo (1994). The Courage to Create. W. W. Norton & Company; Revised ed. edition. ISBN: 978-0-393-31106-8; APA Record: 1976-26086-000
(Return to Main Text)

May, Rollo (1981/1999). Freedom and Destiny. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN: 978-0-393-31842-5; APA Record: 2006-03361-000
(Return to Main Text)

Perchtold-Stefan, C., Rominger, C., Papousek, I., & Fink, A. (2022). Antisocial Schizotypy Is Linked to Malevolent Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 34(3), 355-367. DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2021.2012633
(Return to Main Text)

Pearson, James (2020). The Value of Malevolent Creativity. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 55(1), 127-144. DOI: 10.1007/s10790-020-09741-6
(Return to Main Text)

Related Articles