For one person, spirituality is prayer within an inherited faith. For another, it is the responsibility felt while caring for a child, or wonder beneath the night sky. These experiences are not interchangeable, but each can turn attention toward what seems sacred, deeply meaningful, or larger than the individual self.

Psychology can study how such beliefs and practices shape attention, emotion, identity, relationships, and conduct without deciding whether a metaphysical claim is true. It can also examine when they sustain care and responsibility and when they become entangled with avoidance or coercion. That limited inquiry respects both scientific boundaries and the seriousness with which people live their convictions.

Even good knowledge leaves us with unknowns: mortality, chance, loss, and the need to choose before every consequence is clear. Spirituality can offer an orientation amid these limits. Its psychological significance lies not only in the comfort or intensity of a moment, but in the commitments it sustains and the relationships it shapes.

Defining Spirituality

Spirituality has no single definition accepted across psychology, theology, and the social sciences. Hartelius and Ferrer describe it broadly as an individual or communal movement toward relationship with the whole of one’s world or with some larger presence, whether theistic, nature-based, personal, or impersonal. Their account is deliberately pluralistic: spiritual traditions need not be reduced to different versions of one universal path (Hartelius & Ferrer, 2013).

Another influential approach defines spirituality as a search for the sacred: a process of discovering, maintaining, and sometimes transforming whatever a person regards as set apart or of ultimate importance. The word sacred may refer to God, the divine, ultimate reality, or an aspect of life understood through those ideas. This definition helps distinguish spirituality from general happiness or personal growth, neither of which is necessarily spiritual (Hill & Pargament, 2003).

The concept still describes a family of experiences and practices rather than one psychological trait. It may include self-transcendence, belonging within a larger whole, moral commitment, wonder, ritual, or the search for meaning. Peace and reassurance may accompany it, but spiritual life can also include doubt, grief, obligation, repentance, protest, and the struggle to live according to a value.

Spirituality and Religion

Religion and spirituality overlap, but they are not identical. Religion usually includes shared doctrines, rituals, institutions, stories, and communities. Spirituality refers more directly to a person’s relationship with what they experience as sacred or ultimate. Many people find that relationship within a religious tradition. Others are spiritually engaged without belonging to organized religion, while still others participate in religion mainly through family, culture, or community.

In a study of 346 people drawn from 11 groups, Zinnbauer and colleagues found both convergence and divergence in how participants understood religiousness and spirituality. The categories ‘spiritual and religious’ and ‘spiritual but not religious’ were associated with different definitions and patterns of belief, but the constructs were not clean opposites. The study was exploratory and culturally bounded, yet it demonstrates why researchers should not treat a person’s chosen label as a complete description of belief or practice (Zinnbauer et al., 1997).

The distinction should not be used to idealize private spirituality while treating institutions as inherently corrupt. Organized religion can preserve wisdom, sustain communities, coordinate service, and give practices a history larger than one person’s preference. It can also concentrate authority or place group loyalty above human dignity. Private spirituality can encourage reflection and freedom, yet it can also become insulated from criticism or shaped around whatever the individual most wants to believe.

An older study by Allport and Ross illustrates why form alone tells us little. Their 1967 research distinguished religious commitment treated as an end in itself from religion used mainly for comfort, status, or social advantage. These orientations related differently to prejudice in their samples. The measures and social context are dated, so the findings should not be turned into a verdict on religious people. The durable point is narrower: attending services or using spiritual language does not reveal how belief functions in a person’s life (Allport & Ross, 1967).

How Psychology Studies Spirituality

Belief, Practice, Experience, and Community

Researchers often put different things under the label spirituality. One study counts religious service attendance; another asks about prayer, meditation, closeness to God, or help from a congregation. Those answers tell us different things. Hill and Pargament argued that a broad score can show a relationship with health or well-being without telling us what produced it. To understand the relationship, researchers need to ask about the specific belief, practice, or source of support involved (Hill & Pargament, 2003).

Measurement also shapes conclusions. If questions about spirituality already ask whether someone feels peaceful or purposeful, a study may partly build well-being into its measure of spirituality. By contrast, attendance alone may miss private experience while capturing routine, family expectation, and community participation. Research is most informative when it names what it measured instead of treating spirituality as a single quality.

What the Evidence Can and Cannot Show

People who attend religious services often report better health and well-being, but that pattern needs care. Studies that follow people over time provide stronger evidence than surveys taken at a single moment. Even then, a congregation may help a person, and a person’s health may affect whether they can attend. VanderWeele’s review urges readers to keep both possibilities in view (VanderWeele, 2017).

This distinction guards against two errors. An association between religious participation and health does not prove that a doctrine is true, and distress within spiritual life does not prove that spirituality is false or harmful. Psychological evidence addresses processes and outcomes. It does not settle metaphysical questions.

Looking Beyond the Label

Four questions can help us look past the label a person uses and consider how spiritual life actually functions. They are a way to organize reflection, not a diagnostic test or a validated scale.

1. Orientation: What does the belief or tradition identify as sacred, ultimate, or deeply meaningful?
2. Practice: What habits of attention and behavior does it repeatedly cultivate?
3. Community: What relationships, traditions, and structures of authority shape it?
4. Consequences: Does it support honesty, compassion, responsibility, agency, and repair, or does it encourage avoidance, shame, coercion, and contempt?

Meaning, Experience, and Belonging

Meaning and Orientation

Human beings do not encounter events as isolated facts. We interpret them through broader beliefs about what matters, what a life is for, what can be expected from the world, and what obligations we carry. Park calls this wider system global meaning. A difficult event can create distress when its immediate meaning collides with those broader beliefs and goals (Park, 2010).

Spiritual traditions often contribute to this orienting system. They may offer stories about suffering, responsibility, hope, death, forgiveness, and belonging. These stories can make action possible when circumstances are confusing. They may also need revision when they deny reality or burden a suffering person with blame. Meaning is not helpful merely because it has been found. Its content and consequences matter.

Frankl emphasized self-transcendence: becoming involved in a cause, responsibility, or relationship beyond self-absorption. His work is philosophical and clinical rather than a simple experimental claim, yet it captures an important feature of meaning: purpose often takes form through commitments that ask something of us (Frankl, 1997).

Self-Transcendent Experiences

Some moments briefly loosen our usual focus on ourselves and leave us feeling connected to other people or a larger world. Yaden and colleagues call these self-transcendent experiences. They include experiences as different as awe, deep absorption, mindfulness, and certain forms of love. The similarities are useful for psychology, but the experiences need not be religious or equally helpful for everyone (Yaden et al., 2017).

An experience of unity or reduced self-boundaries can be ordinary, intense, comforting, disorienting, or mixed. Its interpretation depends on the person and context. Transpersonal psychology also studies these shifts in the sense of self. Psychological description can identify recurring features without deciding whether an experience discloses a metaphysical reality.

Awe and a Wider Sense of Self

Spiritual experience sometimes includes awe: an encounter with something vast enough to challenge our usual way of understanding it. A night sky, music, ritual, birth, grief, moral courage, or scientific discovery can interrupt habitual self-concern. Such moments do not prove a particular theology, but they can change the scale at which a person experiences the self and the world (Yaden et al., 2017).

Across six studies, Gottlieb and colleagues found that the tendency to experience awe was associated with scientific thinking and with a more accurate understanding that scientific explanations remain open to testing and revision. Awe, in other words, need not stand against reason. The findings connect a disposition toward awe with openness to scientific revision; they do not show that an awe experience itself changes beliefs (Gottlieb et al., 2018).

Awe should not be romanticized as an automatic moral improvement. In three studies conducted in China, Guan and colleagues found that positive and negative awe related differently to donating and volunteering. Their results did not support the simple claim that awe makes people more prosocial in general. Valence, behavior, and cultural context mattered (Guan et al., 2019).

Belonging and Shared Practice

Spirituality often takes social form. Shared rituals mark transitions, grief, gratitude, and responsibility. Communities can provide practical support and a language for experiences that are difficult to explain alone. VanderWeele’s review found that communal religious participation showed more consistent longitudinal associations with several health and flourishing outcomes than private practice or self-rated spirituality. Belonging, social support, repeated practice, and coordinated action may help explain some of these associations (VanderWeele, 2017).

Community also introduces risk. Belonging can become conditional on silence, obedience, or hostility toward outsiders. A spiritual community should therefore be judged not only by the comfort it offers insiders, but also by how it treats doubt, difference, power, and the freedom to leave.

Spiritual Practices in Daily Life

A spiritual practice gives repeated form to an orientation. Prayer, meditation, worship, study, music, fasting, pilgrimage, gratitude, service, time in nature, and contemplative movement can direct attention toward what a person regards as sacred or deeply important. The same outward activity may serve different functions. A walk may be exercise, avoidance, companionship, contemplation, or several of these at once.

Attention and Contemplation

Mindfulness offers one example of a contemplative practice that moved from a religious tradition into clinical and secular settings. Kabat-Zinn defined mindfulness as awareness that emerges through purposeful, present-moment, nonjudgmental attention. He also warned that mindfulness is a practice rather than an idea that produces instant calm once understood. In clinical settings, mindfulness is often presented in secular terms. This may widen access while changing its cultural and spiritual context (Kabat-Zinn, 2003).

This distinction protects against careless promises. Mindfulness, prayer, or yoga may steady attention and interrupt repetitive thought for some people. They do not guarantee peace, cure psychological disorders, or make ordinary conflicts disappear. Practices can be supportive while remaining only one part of a larger life.

Ritual, Service, and Daily Conduct

Spirituality becomes psychologically significant when it enters conduct. Ritual can create continuity, but its value depends partly on what it helps a person notice and do. Service may express compassion, but it can also conceal exhaustion or a need for approval. Solitude can deepen reflection, but it can also become withdrawal. The relevant question is not whether a practice looks spiritual. It is what relationship to self, other people, and reality the practice repeatedly cultivates.

Buscaglia worried that modern life could lose spontaneity and wonder while retreating into egocentricity. His language is reflective rather than empirical, but it preserves something the psychology of spirituality can easily miss: a practice may be valuable because it keeps a person receptive to life, not simply because it reduces a symptom score (Buscaglia, 1986).

Spiritual Struggles and Their Risks

Spiritual Struggle and Doubt

Spiritual difficulty is not limited to disbelief or institutional abuse. Exline and colleagues identified six related domains of religious and spiritual struggle: conflict involving God, perceived demonic forces, religious people or institutions, moral standards, doubt, and ultimate meaning. Their 26-item scale was developed across three samples and offers a vocabulary for experiences that are easily hidden when spirituality is discussed only as a resource (Exline et al., 2014).

Struggle is not identical to spiritual failure. Anger toward God, doubt, guilt, conflict with a community, or loss of meaning may bring distress, but it may also initiate reflection and change. What matters is how the conflict develops, what support is available, and whether the person can examine it without shame or coercion.

Within the wider study of stress and coping, Pargament and colleagues distinguished positive and negative patterns of religious coping across three samples facing different major stressors. Positive coping included seeking spiritual support, collaborative coping, forgiveness, connection, and benevolent reappraisal. Negative coping included spiritual discontent, feeling punished or abandoned, interpersonal religious conflict, and threatening interpretations. The findings do not divide people into good and bad believers. They show that the content and function of coping matter more than the fact that it is religious (Pargament et al., 1998).

Avoidance, Bypassing, and Premature Meaning

Spiritual language can be used to avoid grief, anger, responsibility, medical care, or necessary conflict. Vaughan described this as a shadow side of spiritual seeking: practices that promise transcendence can become substitutes for working through relationships and ordinary psychological problems. Her discussion comes from transpersonal clinical theory rather than controlled outcome research, so it is best used as a conceptual warning (Vaughan, 1991).

Avoidance can sound virtuous. A person may rush to forgiveness before acknowledging harm, label anger as spiritually inferior, or interpret suffering as proof of insufficient faith. Meaning-making can also become premature when a person is pressured to find a lesson before grief has been felt. Park’s review found that searching for meaning does not always produce adjustment; repeated searching can coexist with unresolved distress. The evidence does not support forcing a positive interpretation from every loss (Park, 2010).

Authority, Coercion, and the Need for Clinical Care

A leader may treat questions as ego resistance. A group may divide the world into enlightened insiders and dangerous outsiders. These responses protect a belief system from correction by relocating every problem inside the doubter. Questions of epistemic trust matter here: does authority remain open to challenge? Can members disagree or leave without retaliation? Can a person seek medical or psychological care without shame?

Spiritual support can remain meaningful alongside clinical care. An unusual experience should not be treated as illness simply because it is unfamiliar, but spiritual significance does not by itself rule out a mental-health concern. Reviewing largely Latin American research, Moreira-Almeida and Cardeña identify distress, impaired functioning, cultural context, and other symptoms as considerations in distinguishing spiritual experiences from disorders. When safety or functioning is at risk, qualified assessment matters (Moreira-Almeida & Cardeña, 2011).

Faith, Uncertainty, and Intellectual Humility

The desire for an answer becomes strongest when life refuses one. Spirituality may respond with a settled belief, a practice of trust, a community of interpretation, or permission to remain with mystery. Each response can be life-giving. Each can also become rigid when uncertainty is treated as a threat that must be defeated.

Intellectual humility is the capacity to recognize the limits of one’s knowledge and the possibility that a current belief may be mistaken. Porter and colleagues note that this capacity can be especially difficult when political, moral, or religious commitments feel threatened. Their review links intellectual humility with greater willingness to learn, consider evidence, and tolerate opposing views, while also warning that it is not a cure-all and does not guarantee personal well-being (Porter et al., 2022).

Faith and uncertainty are therefore not simple opposites. Faith may involve commitment where proof is incomplete. Humility recognizes that commitment does not grant complete knowledge. A spirituality capable of holding both can offer hope without demanding false certainty. It can remain devoted while still allowing experience, evidence, and the suffering of other people to correct it.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

Spirituality can widen the frame of living without placing us outside ordinary life. It can return our attention to wonder, conscience, grief, and people who need us—dimensions that productivity and control cannot fully measure.

Some of the most meaningful moments in my life have been ordinary ones, including time with my grandchildren. Their presence does not answer every question about existence. It makes some questions less urgent by returning attention to a life that is already asking to be lived.

Reason and reverence can coexist. A person can test beliefs, question authority, seek clinical help when needed, and still remain open to mystery. The measure of a grounded spirituality is not escape from ordinary life, but the care with which we return to it.

Associated Concepts

• Meaning of Life: The search for coherence, significance, and direction provides one psychological context for spiritual belief and practice.
• Awe: Awe involves perceived vastness and accommodation and can be interpreted through spiritual, scientific, aesthetic, or moral frames.
• Transpersonal Psychology: This approach explores experiences in which the sense of self extends beyond the individual, including awe, self-transcendence, and spiritual connection. It offers one way to study these experiences without assuming that every spiritual experience has the same meaning.
• Mindfulness: Mindfulness is a contemplative practice of present-moment attention with Buddhist roots and contemporary secular applications.
• Flow State: Deep absorption can quiet self-consciousness and is one form of experience sometimes discussed within the broader family of self-transcendence.
• Existential Funk: Periods of doubt and disorientation can expose a conflict between lived experience and a person’s broader system of meaning.
• Logotherapy: Frankl’s approach emphasizes responsibility and the human search for meaning, including meaning found through self-transcendence.
• Self Actualization: Humanistic psychology considers growth, integration, and the realization of potential, themes that overlap with some accounts of spiritual development.

References

Allport, Gordon W.; Ross, J. Michael (1967). Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432-443. DOI: 10.1037/h0021212
(Return to Main Text)

Buscaglia, Leo F. (1986). Personhood: The Art of Being Fully Human. Ballantine Books. ISBN: 9780449901991
(Return to Main Text)

Exline, Julie J.; Pargament, Kenneth I.; Grubbs, Joshua B.; Yali, Ann Marie (2014). The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 6(3), 208-222. DOI: 10.1037/a0036465
(Return to Main Text)

Frankl, Viktor E. (1997). Man’s Search for Ultimate Meaning. Basic Books. ISBN: 9780306456206
(Return to Main Text)

Gottlieb, Sara; Keltner, Dacher; Lombrozo, Tania (2018). Awe as a Scientific Emotion. Cognitive Science, 42(6), 2081-2094. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12648
(Return to Main Text)

Guan, Fang; Chen, Jun; Chen, Outong; Liu, Lihong; Zha, Yuzhu (2019). Awe and Prosocial Tendency. Current Psychology, 38(4), 1033-1041. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00244-7
(Return to Main Text)

Hartelius, Glenn; Ferrer, Jorge N. (2013). Transpersonal Philosophy: The Participatory Turn. In H. L. Friedman & G. Hartelius (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Transpersonal Psychology (pp. 187–202). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118591277.ch10
(Return to Main Text)

Hill, Peter C.; Pargament, Kenneth I. (2003). Advances in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Religion and Spirituality: Implications for Physical and Mental Health Research. American Psychologist, 58(1), 64-74. DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.64
(Return to Main Text)

Kabat-Zinn, Jon (2003). Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-156. DOI: 10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
(Return to Main Text)

Moreira-Almeida, Alexander; Cardeña, Etzel (2011). Differential Diagnosis Between Non-Pathological Psychotic and Spiritual Experiences and Mental Disorders: A Contribution From Latin American Studies to the ICD-11. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria, 33(Suppl. 1), S21-S36. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-44462011000500004
(Return to Main Text)

Park, Crystal L. (2010). Making Sense of the Meaning Literature: An Integrative Review of Meaning Making and Its Effects on Adjustment to Stressful Life Events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257-301. DOI: 10.1037/a0018301
(Return to Main Text)

Pargament, Kenneth I.; Smith, Bruce W.; Koenig, Harold G.; Perez, Lisa (1998). Patterns of Positive and Negative Religious Coping With Major Life Stressors. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(4), 710-724. DOI: 10.2307/1388152
(Return to Main Text)

Porter, Tenelle; Elnakouri, Abdo; Meyers, Ethan A.; Shibayama, Takuya; Jayawickreme, Eranda; Grossmann, Igor (2022). Predictors and Consequences of Intellectual Humility. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(9), 524-536. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-022-00081-9
(Return to Main Text)

VanderWeele, Tyler J. (2017). On the Promotion of Human Flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8148-8156. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114
(Return to Main Text)

Vaughan, Frances (1991). Spiritual Issues in Psychotherapy. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 23(2), 105-119. APA Record: 1992-32183-001
(Return to Main Text)

Yaden, David Bryce; Haidt, Jonathan; Hood, Ralph W., Jr.; Vago, David R.; Newberg, Andrew B. (2017). The Varieties of Self-Transcendent Experience. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 143-160. DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000102
(Return to Main Text)

Zinnbauer, Brian J.; Pargament, Kenneth I.; Cole, Brenda; Rye, Mark S.; Butter, Eric M.; Belavich, Timothy G.; Hipp, Kathleen M.; Scott, Allie B.; Kadar, Jill L. (1997). Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549-564. DOI: 10.2307/1387689
(Return to Main Text)