Conflict Avoidance: Strategies for Peaceful Resolution

In a world defined by rapid change and diverse perspectives, conflict is an unavoidable aspect of human interaction. From the bustling corridors of corporate offices to the intimate settings of our homes, disagreements arise as individuals navigate their unique values and goals. While healthy conflict can be a catalyst for innovation and personal growth, there exists a darker side where avoidance becomes the norm—leading to unresolved issues that fester beneath the surface. This phenomenon, known as pathological conflict avoidance, manifests in behaviors that not only disrupt personal well-being but also strain relationships with family, friends, and colleagues.

Pathological conflict avoidance is more than just shying away from confrontation; it represents a profound struggle with anxiety that paralyzes individuals into silence. As they sidestep difficult conversations or unmet expectations in hopes of preserving harmony, many inadvertently sacrifice their emotional health and relational quality. The irony lies in how this evasion ultimately breeds resentment and disconnection rather than peace. Understanding the implications of such avoidance is crucial—not only for personal growth but also for fostering healthier interactions within our communities. In recognizing these patterns, we open doors to constructive dialogue and meaningful resolution that enrich our lives rather than diminish them.

Understanding Conflict

Conflict is a natural part of human interaction, stemming from diverse viewpoints, unmet needs, and miscommunication. However, it is essential to distinguish between healthy, constructive conflict and destructive, volatile conflict. Healthy conflict can lead to innovation, collaboration, and improved relationships, whereas destructive conflict can result in damaged connections and heightened stress.

In contrast, destructive conflict destroys relationships and impedes progress. Over the past several decades, our congress have digressed into more constructive methods of conflict, ultimately damaging the foundation of our country. Markedly, there is no perfect measure to determine the appropriate amount of conflict for a healthy relationship.

John Gottman, a prominent psychologist known for his extensive research on marriage and relationships, wrote: “Couples simply have different styles of conflict. Some avoid fights at all costs, some fight a lot, and some are able to talk out difference and find a compromise without ever raising their voices. No one style is necessarily better than the other—as long as the style works for both people. Couples can run into trouble if one partner always wants to talk out a conflict while the other just wants to watch playoffs” (Gottman & Silver, 1999).

Importance of Conflict

Resolving differences involves addressing them in a constructive and proactive manner. By prioritizing open communication, active listening, and empathy, individuals and organizations can navigate potential areas of contention before they escalate into harmful disputes. It is imperative to create a positive and inclusive environment where everyone feels heard and respected.

Open communication entails fostering an atmosphere where people feel comfortable expressing their thoughts and concerns without fear of judgment. Active listening plays a pivotal role in conflict resolution as it demonstrates genuine interest in understanding the perspectives of others. Moreover, empathy allows individuals to relate to and understand the emotions and experiences of those with differing viewpoints, fostering a sense of unity rather than discord. By embracing these principles, individuals and organizations can foster harmonious relationships and mitigate the negative impacts of unresolved conflicts.

Dr. Daniel Amen, a physician, psychiatrist, and founder of Amen Clinics, wrote that “whenever you give in to another person to avoid a fight, you give away a little bit of your power and begin to resent the relationship. Avoiding conflict in the short run often has devastating effects in the long-term. In a firm but kind way, stick up for what you think is right. It will help keep the relationship balanced” (Amen, 2015).

Destructive Conflict

Conflict becomes damaging when it escalates to a point where it hinders productivity, strains relationships, or causes emotional distress. Destructive conflict can involve personal attacks, unrealistic demands, or the refusal to cooperate. It often leads to a toxic work environment and can have long-lasting negative effects on the individuals involved and the overall team dynamic. Recognizing the signs of damaging conflict early on and addressing them through open communication and conflict resolution techniques is crucial for maintaining a healthy and productive work environment.

Alan E. Fruzzetti, a psychologist known for his work in the areas of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and family interventions, explains that “destructive conflict in couples corrodes relationships and makes both partners miserable” (Fruzzetti, 2006).

Pathological Conflict Avoidance

Maladaptive conflict avoidance is a form of coping in which a person habitually avoids addressing conflicts, leading to the suppression of feelings and evasion of difficult conversations or situations. Individuals that avoid conflict

While avoiding conflict can provide short-term relief from discomfort, it often results in increased stress and potential harm to relationships and personal well-being in the long run. This behavior can prevent individuals from resolving issues constructively and may contribute to a cycle of anxiety and avoidance.

Underlying Causes for Pathological Conflict Avoidance

The underlying causes for pathological conflict avoidance are multifaceted and can include:

• Anxiety: Often, the avoidance of demands stems from deep-seated anxiety about expectations and the social environment.
• Fear of Upsetting Others: A deep-rooted fear of upsetting others can lead to people-pleasing behaviors and conflict avoidance.
• Neurological Disorders: In some cases, pathological demand avoidance is seen in individuals with pervasive developmental disorders, now reconceptualized as part of the autism spectrum.
• Environmental Factors: Growing up in an environment that was dismissive or hypercritical can contribute to the development of conflict avoidance tendencies.
• Ambivalence: Mixed emotions or contradictory beliefs about a situation can influence approach-avoidance conflicts.
• Uncertainty: Lack of clarity about potential outcomes or risks involved can intensify conflict avoidance.
• Value Discrepancy: Conflicting personal values or priorities can contribute to the approach-avoidance conflict.

Understanding these underlying causes can be the first step in addressing and managing pathological conflict avoidance. 

The Impact of Pathological Conflict Avoidance

One enormous cost of conflict avoidance is lack of attunement with a significant other. The fear of discussing significant aspects of our lives with our partner because we fear rejection. Consequently, the secrets limit intimacy because we are not fully known.

Gottman explains that “at first attunement will seem awkward and inefficient. It certainly is not natural.” He explains that “what is ‘natural’ for many people is avoiding talking about negative emotions, or dismissing them, and assuming that just the passage of time will heal all emotional wounds. What is natural is avoiding conflict but then paying a huge price for that avoidance.” He concludes, “attunement seems unnatural and inefficient, but it is actually potentially more efficient. Like in the acquisition of any skill, the beginning seems strange and awkward” (Gottman, 2011).

In a recent article, researchers found that higher levels of conflict and conflict avoidance were associated with greater psychological distress in both men and women. Conversely, higher levels of conflict resolution were linked to lower distress levels (Bruce et al., 2024). These findings highlight the need for healthy conflict resolution skills.

Common Negative Consequences of Pathological Conflict Avoidance

• Stress and Anxiety: Continuously avoiding conflicts can lead to increased stress and anxiety levels.
• Depression: The suppression of emotions and avoidance of issues may contribute to feelings of depression.
• Relationship Strain: Avoiding conflicts can harm relationships, leading to misunderstandings and resentment.
• Physical Health Risks: Chronic stress from conflict avoidance may lead to physical health problems, such as heart disease and high blood pressure.
• Reduced Resilience: Avoiding conflict can compromise an individual’s resilience and mental health over time.

It’s important for individuals who recognize these patterns in themselves to seek support, which may include therapy or counseling, to develop healthier coping strategies.

Assertiveness

We all experience needs in our lives, and when those needs are left unmet, it can cause us emotional pain. It’s natural to feel reluctant to ask for what we need, especially when we fear potential conflict or rejection. However, in order to have our needs fulfilled, it’s important to practice assertiveness and communicate clearly with others. By asserting our needs in a respectful and direct manner, we create an opportunity for understanding and collaboration in our relationships, ultimately fostering a healthier and more supportive environment for everyone involved.

Gabot Maté, a Canadian physician with a special interest in childhood development and trauma,wrote that “for people unused to expressing their feelings and unaccustomed to recognizing their emotional needs, it is extremely challenging to find the confidence and the words to approach their loved ones both compassionately and assertively” (Maté, 2008).

Fear of Rejection and Assertiveness

Ignoring our personal wants, desires, and needs by suppressing them is a form of self-sacrifice, often done in service of avoiding conflict. We often fear conflict because conflict may be a precursor to rejection. It is almost better, at least we reason, to ignore our personal relationship needs that to ask for someone to give and be rejected. Dr. Roger Covin explains that “self-sacrificing individuals are overcompensating for some perceived defect, or are so afraid of the pain of rejection, that they are willing to subvert their own needs for those of others” (Covin, 2011).

Assertiveness in asking for need fulfillment is dismissed as selfish. However, in reality the individual is afraid that assertiveness will hasten the inevitable rejection when our true self is exposed. However, assertiveness in not selfish. It is a statement of confidence. Jordan and Margaret Paul wrote: “The often-misunderstood difference between anger and assertiveness is that the latter is going after what we want firmly without considering the other person wrong” (Paul & Paul, 2002).

Assertiveness implies clarity. The individual clearly exposes identifies what they want, making themselves vulnerable to rejection. A risk they are afraid to take.

See Assertiveness for more information on this topic

Treatment for Pathological Conflict Avoidance

Madeline J. Bruce and her colleagues suggest that interventions to develop conflict resolution skills could have widespread positive effects on mental health (Bruce et al., 2024). When individuals have effective means to approach and resolve conflict, they are less likely to engage in harmful practices such as conflict avoidance.

Treating pathological conflict avoidance typically involves a combination of therapeutic strategies aimed at improving communication skills, increasing self-awareness, and developing healthier coping mechanisms. Harville Hendrix and his wife, Helen LaKelly Hunt explain that by creating safety in couples dialogue, the fear of conflict subsides. They continue, explaining that “talking about your fear in the safety of Imago Dialogue paradoxically closes the exit of avoidance” (Hendrix & Hunt, 1988).

See Imago Relationship Therapy for more information on this style of communication

List of Treatment and Behaviors Options

Here are some other approaches that may be helpful:

• Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): This type of therapy can help you identify and change negative thought patterns and behaviors related to conflict avoidance.
• Person-Centered Approaches: These focus on providing a supportive environment where you can explore your feelings and behaviors without judgment.
• Holistic Lifestyle Approaches: Incorporating stress-reduction techniques such as mindfulness, exercise, and healthy eating can improve overall well-being and resilience.
• Social Skills Training: This can help you learn how to assertively express your needs and handle conflicts in a constructive manner.
• Resilience-Building Strategies: Building resilience can help you better cope with the stressors that trigger avoidance behaviors.
• Collaboration with Support Systems: Engaging with friends, family, or support groups can provide encouragement and accountability as you work on addressing your avoidance behaviors.
• Sensory Integration Therapy: For some individuals, especially those on the autism spectrum, sensory integration therapy may help manage the sensory overload that can lead to avoidance behaviors.
• Adaptive Educational Strategies: If you’re in a learning environment, working with educators to adapt teaching methods and demands can reduce anxiety and avoidance.

It’s important to consult with a mental health professional to determine the most appropriate treatment plan for your specific needs. They can help you understand the underlying causes of your avoidance and guide you through the process of overcoming it. Remember, seeking help is a positive step towards improving your quality of life and relationships.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

In conclusion, understanding the complexities of conflict avoidance is essential for cultivating healthier relationships and promoting personal well-being. As we have explored, pathological conflict avoidance not only stifles open communication but also creates a breeding ground for resentment and emotional distress. By acknowledging these patterns and their underlying causes, individuals can begin to take proactive steps toward addressing conflicts constructively rather than fleeing from them. Embracing assertiveness and fostering an environment where dialogue thrives are crucial elements in transforming our approach to conflict.

Ultimately, the journey from avoidance to engagement paves the way for deeper connection and collaborative growth—both personally and within organizations. By viewing differences as opportunities rather than obstacles, we empower ourselves and others to navigate disagreements with empathy and respect. This shift not only enhances our individual experiences but contributes to a culture that values open communication as a cornerstone of healthy interactions. In doing so, we can turn potentially destructive conflicts into meaningful conversations that lead us toward mutual understanding and lasting change.

Last Update: August 12, 2025

References:

Amen, Daniel (2015) Change Your Brain, Change Your Life (Revised and Expanded): The Breakthrough Program for Conquering Anxiety, Depression, Obsessiveness, Lack of Focus, Anger, and Memory Problems. Harmony; Revised, Expanded edition.
(Return to Article)

Bruce, M., Chang, A., Evans, L., Streb, M., Dehon, J., & Handal, P. (2024). Relationship of Conflict, Conflict Avoidance, and Conflict Resolution to Psychological Adjustment. Psychological Reports, 127(5), 2324-2333. DOI: 10.1177/00332941221146708
(Return to Article)

Covin, Roger (2011). The Need To Be Liked. Amazon.
(Return to Article)

Fruzzetti, Alan E. (2006). The High-Conflict Couple: A Dialectical Behavior Therapy Guide to Finding Peace, Intimacy, and Validation. New Harbinger Publications; 1st edition.
(Return to Article)

Gottman, John (2011). The Science of Trust: Emotional Attunement for Couples. W. W. Norton & Company; Illustrated edition.
(Return to Article)

Gottman, John & Silver, Nan (1999) The Seven Principles for Making Marriages Work. Harmony; 1st edition.
(Return to Article)

Hendrix, Harville; Hunt, Helen LaKelly (1988). Getting the Love You Want: a Guide for Couples. St. Martin’s Griffin.
(Return to Article)

Maté, Gabor (2008). When the Body Says No. ‎Trade Paper Press; 1st edition.
(Return to Article)

Paul, Jordan; Paul, Margaret (2002). Do I Have to Give Up Me to Be Loved by You: Second Edition. Hazelden Publishing.
(Return to Article)