Some evenings leave us pleasantly entertained, yet strangely dissatisfied. Others leave us tired after doing something we would willingly do again: helping someone through a difficult day, working patiently at a skill, or tending a relationship that matters. These experiences invite a question that reaches beyond the mood of the moment. What makes a life go well?

What Eudaimonia Means

We often use happiness to describe how we feel. As a perspective on human flourishing, eudaimonia broadens the question to how we live. The distinction matters when an enjoyable day leaves something important unattended, or a demanding commitment contributes to a life we value.

In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle connects the human good with activity in accordance with virtue over a complete life. Having admirable qualities is insufficient if they never find expression in what we do. His account also recognizes a place for pleasure and the importance of external resources. This is a philosophical account of the good life, rather than an experimentally established definition of happiness (Aristotle, n.d., Book I, sections 7–8).

For our purposes, this invites attention to the direction of our lives. What do our repeated choices express? Are we becoming more capable of caring, thinking carefully, and responding to others with fairness? These are questions about the quality of living, extending beyond the emotional reward of any one moment.

Consider a person praised at work for an idea that largely belonged to a colleague. The recognition may feel good and advance a valued career goal. Yet the pleasure and sense of progress leave an important question unanswered: was the achievement pursued fairly? This imagined situation illustrates why the quality of an activity matters alongside its emotional rewards.

Hedonia and Eudaimonia

Psychological research commonly approaches well-being through two overlapping traditions. The hedonic tradition examines pleasure, pleasant and unpleasant feelings, and satisfaction with life. The eudaimonic tradition examines meaning, the development of human capacities, and positive functioning (Ryan & Deci, 2001). Hedonia therefore includes more than a passing thrill; a considered judgment that life is satisfying also belongs within much of this research.

Eudaimonia is equally easy to narrow too far. A feeling of purpose is relevant, but flourishing also raises questions about relationships, the use of our abilities, and the values expressed in our conduct. Meaning, self-actualization, and eudaimonia overlap without becoming interchangeable names for the same thing.

One helpful distinction concerns the questions we ask, though researchers do not all draw the boundary in the same place. A hedonic question might be, “How enjoyable and satisfying is this experience?” A eudaimonic question might be, “How does this activity contribute to living well?” Ryan, Huta, and Deci (2008) emphasize this distinction between pleasurable outcomes and the processes of a well-lived life. A shared meal, for example, may offer immediate enjoyment while also expressing care and deepening a valued relationship.

Pleasure Belongs in a Flourishing Life

A discussion of virtue and purpose can quietly become suspicious of enjoyment. We may begin to treat an afternoon of pleasure as something that must be defended by its usefulness. That adds an unnecessary burden to ordinary happiness. Enjoying a conversation or laughing at a familiar movie need not become another assignment in personal development.

In Happier, Tal Ben-Shahar brings pleasure and meaning together in his account of happiness. His discussion allows for emotional pain within an overall fulfilling life (Ben-Shahar, 2007). It offers a useful perspective on the original question: we can care about the direction of our lives while also wanting to enjoy being alive.

Todd Kashdan and Robert Biswas-Diener make a similar case for allowing both pleasure and meaning a place in our lives. Their examples of eudaimonic activity include helping others and developing our abilities, while their discussion also defends enjoyment without requiring every pleasure to serve a profound purpose (Kashdan & Biswas-Diener, 2014). These books provide accessible interpretations of the good life; they do not by themselves establish an ideal ratio of pleasure to meaning.

The balance will vary. A demanding week may call for unhurried enjoyment. A period filled with distraction may leave us wanting more meaningful engagement. Some experiences offer both at once. We can notice what our lives are lacking without turning either rest or effort into a moral ranking.

Psychological Perspectives on Flourishing

Ancient philosophy asks what makes a life good. Psychology adds ways of describing and studying aspects of that life. The translation between them remains imperfect: a questionnaire can examine a person’s experience of purpose, but it cannot settle every ethical question about which purposes deserve pursuit.

Researchers do not always mean the same thing by eudaimonia. Some study why we pursue a goal; others look at what we do, how we feel, or how well we manage life. Huta and Waterman explain why those differences matter: a study of purposeful activity and a study of pleasant feelings are examining different aspects of experience (Huta & Waterman, 2014). Keeping that distinction in view helps us understand what each finding can tell us.

A broader review by Lambert and colleagues also traces several philosophical traditions behind well-being research and discusses criticisms of overly individualistic approaches (Lambert et al., 2015). Flourishing deserves attention to relationships and cultural context as well as individual experience.

Well-Being Beyond Pleasant Feelings

Carol Ryff’s model of psychological well-being gives this broader view a practical vocabulary. It includes self-acceptance, positive relationships, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, and personal growth (Ryff, 1989). Environmental mastery refers to managing the demands and opportunities of our surroundings; it does not mean controlling everything that happens.

These dimensions help explain why a life can look different when viewed through more than one measure. Someone may feel discouraged while learning to manage new responsibilities, yet recognize growing competence and a clearer sense of purpose. Conversely, pleasant feelings alone tell us little about whether relationships are caring or daily activities reflect considered values.

Ryff’s original study examined self-reports from 321 young, middle-aged, and older adults. It helped show that familiar measures of happiness left aspects of positive functioning underrepresented. It did not establish that everyone must achieve the same balance across all six dimensions (Ryff, 1989).

Psychological Needs and Meaningful Activity

Self-determination theory asks whether our activities leave us feeling willing, capable, and connected. In their account of eudaimonia, Ryan, Huta, and Deci (2008) emphasize goals we value for their own sake, acting with awareness, and meeting three psychological needs. Autonomy means having a sense of choice in what we do. Competence means feeling able to meet a challenge, while relatedness means feeling connected to and cared for by others.

This shifts attention from the appearance of an achievement to its place in a person’s life. A promotion may support meaningful work, or it may bring demands that crowd out valued relationships. Caring for a family member may express a deeply held commitment while still requiring relief and support. The activity’s title tells only part of the story.

This is a theory-informed account of flourishing, not a single proven formula. Its attention to social conditions is especially useful: opportunities to act willingly, learn, and connect depend partly on how families, workplaces, and communities treat people (Ryan et al., 2008).

Eudaimonic Growth Over Time

Even growth has different meanings. Bauer and colleagues distinguish reflective growth motivation, concerned with deeper understanding, from experiential growth motivation, concerned with enriching experience. In five studies with U.S. college students, these motives showed different associations with measures of maturity and well-being (Bauer et al., 2015). A wish to understand life more deeply was not simply the same as a wish to feel more fulfilled.

An earlier study followed university students for approximately three years. Students whose accounts of important goals emphasized learning and understanding tended to show later gains in a measure of psychological maturity. Those who emphasized richer personal experiences and relationships tended to show later gains in well-being (Bauer & McAdams, 2010). The findings suggest that different kinds of growth goals may be connected with different changes in our lives.

The longitudinal findings came from 87 participants who provided follow-up data, out of 145 at the beginning. The observational design and university sample limit the conclusions. The study strengthens the evidence that the way people understand their goals can be relevant to later development; it does not establish that changing a goal narrative causes growth.

We can take from this a more patient understanding of development. Becoming more thoughtful and experiencing greater happiness may unfold differently. Neither a difficult afternoon nor an encouraging one can tell us the whole story.

What Makes a Pursuit Worthwhile

The workplace example brings us back to the ethical question. A career goal can feel important while the way we pursue it harms another person. Personal significance deserves reflection alongside the means we use and the consequences for others. In an Aristotelian account, virtue belongs within the question of living well; it cannot be replaced by feeling successful.

Meaning itself has several aspects. Martela and Steger distinguish coherence, the sense that life makes sense; purpose, having direction; and significance, experiencing life as worthwhile (Martela & Steger, 2016). These distinctions clarify what someone may experience as meaningful. They do not, by themselves, settle whether a particular purpose is ethically defensible.

VanderWeele’s broader proposal for human flourishing includes character and virtue alongside meaning, relationships, health, and happiness (VanderWeele, 2017). This is one framework rather than a universal definition, but it keeps a useful question visible: how well does our pursuit respect the lives connected with our own?

Suppose the person who received the praise decides to correct the record. An honest conversation may threaten a welcome feeling of success while restoring appropriate credit to the colleague. The ethical value of the correction is not measured solely by how comfortable the conversation feels. Equally, prolonged self-punishment would add little to the practical work of acknowledging what happened and making amends.

Research on self-forgiveness helps make the distinction concrete. Woodyatt and colleagues distinguish relief from self-condemnation from a process involving responsibility and reaffirming violated values (Woodyatt et al., 2017). Their studies concern interpersonal wrongdoing, not flourishing in general. Here, the distinction helps illustrate how self-compassion and accountability can both have a place in moving forward.

For everyday reflection, we can consider the values a pursuit expresses, its effects on others, and whether its costs remain reasonable. These are questions for reflection rather than a score for how well we are living. A worthwhile commitment can ask something of us while still allowing boundaries, support, and reconsideration.

Finding a Balance Within a Real Life

Living well takes place within a life we actually have. Financial strain, illness, caregiving demands, and limited choices can make it difficult to protect either enjoyment or meaningful activity. A discussion of flourishing becomes less useful when it asks people to think their way around conditions that require practical help.

VanderWeele (2017) treats financial and material stability as resources that may help sustain flourishing, rather than simply as ends in themselves. The social emphasis in self-determination theory likewise places supportive conditions within the discussion of well-being (Ryan et al., 2008). A caregiver may need someone to share the work; a student may need time and resources to learn. These everyday applications remind us that making space for flourishing can involve changing an arrangement or accepting assistance.

Discomfort deserves interpretation. Learning can expose what we do not understand, and repairing a mistake may involve embarrassment. We can ask whether a difficulty serves a value we endorse, whether the demand is proportionate, and whether support is available. Exhaustion, coercion, or continuing harm should not acquire a noble appearance simply because we call the experience growth.

Within the choices available, it may help to consider both the experience an activity offers and the life it helps sustain. Some activities contribute to both. Others involve a temporary sacrifice we judge worthwhile. Still others give simple relief or enjoyment. No one decision needs to carry the entire weight of a good life.

This balance cannot be settled once and maintained without attention. Commitments change, capacities shift, and a valued goal can become too costly. We can remain faithful to what matters while reconsidering how we pursue it.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

We return, then, to the evening that felt pleasant and the evening that felt worthwhile. Perhaps the difference tells us something useful about what we need. Enjoyment can be welcome without answering every question about our lives. A meaningful commitment can matter even when its demands leave us tired.

Sometimes that wider view includes an uncomfortable correction. Giving another person their due may cost us a little recognition and help us live more honestly with them. At other times, living well may mean setting aside the demand to improve and enjoying the company already around us.

Eudaimonia invites us to give the wider pattern some care. We consider the people our choices affect, the capacities we are developing, and the values finding expression in our ordinary days. We also leave room for pleasure. A life worth living is one we are allowed to enjoy.

Associated Concepts

• Human Flourishing: Broad well-being across important areas of life, including relationships, meaningful activity, and positive functioning; eudaimonia offers one perspective on living well.
• A Meaningful Life: A life experienced as coherent, purposeful, and worthwhile. These qualities overlap with eudaimonic concerns without exhausting them.
• Self-Actualization: The ongoing development and expression of a person’s capacities and potential, especially within Maslow’s humanistic account of motivation.
• Self-Determination Theory: A theory of motivation that emphasizes autonomy, competence, and relatedness as basic psychological needs relevant to growth and well-being.
• PERMA Model: Seligman’s framework of positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment, offering another view of well-being.
• Life Balance: A sustainable pattern of attention, effort, rest, and participation across valued areas of life, adjusted to a person’s circumstances.

References

Aristotle (n.d.). Nicomachean Ethics. W. D. Ross, translator. Book I, sections 7–8. The Internet Classics Archive, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Book I text.
(Return to Main Text)

Bauer, Jack J.; McAdams, Dan P. (2010). Eudaimonic Growth: Narrative Growth Goals Predict Increases in Ego Development and Subjective Well-Being 3 Years Later. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 761–772. DOI: 10.1037/a0019654.
(Return to Main Text)

Bauer, Jack J.; Park, Sun W.; Montoya, R. Matthew; Wayment, Heidi A. (2015). Growth Motivation Toward Two Paths of Eudaimonic Self-Development. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 185–210. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-014-9504-9.
(Return to Main Text)

Ben-Shahar, Tal (2007). Happier: Learn the Secrets to Daily Joy and Lasting Fulfillment. McGraw-Hill. Publisher record.
(Return to Main Text)

Huta, Veronika; Waterman, Alan S. (2014). Eudaimonia and Its Distinction from Hedonia: Developing a Classification and Terminology for Understanding Conceptual and Operational Definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0.
(Return to Main Text)

Kashdan, Todd B.; Biswas-Diener, Robert (2014). The Upside of Your Dark Side: Why Being Your Whole Self—Not Just Your “Good” Self—Drives Success and Fulfillment. Hudson Street Press. E-book. ISBN: 9780698161313.
(Return to Main Text)

Lambert, Louise; Passmore, Holli-Anne; Holder, Mark D. (2015). Foundational Frameworks of Positive Psychology: Mapping Well-Being Orientations. Canadian Psychology, 56(3), 311–321. DOI: 10.1037/cap0000033.
(Return to Main Text)

Martela, Frank; Steger, Michael F. (2016). The Three Meanings of Meaning in Life: Distinguishing Coherence, Purpose, and Significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531–545. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623.
(Return to Main Text)

Ryan, Richard M.; Deci, Edward L. (2001). On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.
(Return to Main Text)

Ryan, Richard M.; Huta, Veronika; Deci, Edward L. (2008). Living Well: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4.
(Return to Main Text)

Ryff, Carol D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.
(Return to Main Text)

VanderWeele, Tyler J. (2017). On the Promotion of Human Flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8148–8156. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702996114.
(Return to Main Text)

Woodyatt, Lydia; Wenzel, Michael; Ferber, Matthew (2017). Two Pathways to Self-Forgiveness: A Hedonic Path via Self-Compassion and a Eudaimonic Path via the Reaffirmation of Violated Values. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(3), 515–536. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12194.
(Return to Main Text)

Last Update: November 8, 2026