Self-Worth: The Cornerstone of Our Lives

Imagine a world where every action, every decision, is filtered through a lens of self-doubt and insecurity. In such a reality, individuals often find themselves trapped in a cycle of questioning their abilities, worthiness, and overall place in the grand scheme of things. This pervasive sense of uncertainty can lead to significant emotional turmoil and hinder personal growth. For many grappling with low self-worth, this internal struggle manifests as anxiety or an overwhelming fear of failure. The need for validation from others becomes paramount; each compliment can provide temporary relief while criticism feels like a devastating blow. This constant scrutiny not only affects one’s mental health but also limits opportunities for authentic engagement in relationships and career pursuits.

In his groundbreaking work on self-worth theory, psychologist Martin Covington explored these intricate dynamics further by demonstrating how deeply our self-esteem shapes our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. He posited that an individual’s perception of their own value directly influences their motivations—an insight that has profound implications for understanding human behavior across various contexts.

By examining the impact of achievement on self-worth, Covington illuminated how success or failure can dramatically alter one’s sense of identity and purpose. His research highlights the importance of fostering environments that support healthy self-esteem development rather than perpetuating cycles based on conditional acceptance tied to performance outcomes. Ultimately, recognizing these patterns opens pathways toward greater resilience and fulfillment in life’s myriad endeavors.

Key Definition:

Self-worth theory is a psychological framework that focuses on the belief individuals have about their own value and worth. It suggests that people are motivated to maintain or enhance their self-esteem, and that their actions and decisions are influenced by this motivation. According to the theory, individuals may engage in various behaviors to protect their self-worth, such as seeking out validation from others or avoiding situations that could potentially damage their self-esteem. This theory has important implications for understanding human behavior and motivation.

Key Tenets of Self-Worth Theory

The premise of self-worth theory revolves around the idea that individuals strive to protect their self-worth. It posits that people are motivated to avoid feelings of inadequacy or failure, leading them to adopt strategies that protect their self-esteem. Self-worth theory focuses on the internal motivation to protect narratives of personal ability. Covington and Carol L. Omelick explain, “The basic assumption is that personal worth depends heavily on one’s accomplishments, and because ability is perceived as a prime ingredient for success and inability a major cause of failure, ability becomes critical to self-definition” (Covington & Omelick, 1979).

Moreover, the theory underscores the distinction between contingent and non-contingent self-worth. Contingent self-worth is based on external factors such as approval, success, or attractiveness, while non-contingent self-worth is anchored in a more intrinsic sense of value.

Key Topics in Self-Worth Theory

Self-worth theory, developed by Martin Covington, is distinct from other theories related to self-esteem and motivation in several ways:

Focus on Achievement: Self-worth theory is particularly concerned with how individuals seek self-acceptance through achievement and success, especially in competitive academic settings. It suggests that people equate their worth with their ability to succeed.
Role of Failure: The theory posits that the fear of failure is a critical factor influencing motivation. Individuals may avoid challenging tasks to protect their sense of self-worth.
Self-Esteem vs. Self-Worth: While self-esteem can fluctuate based on external circumstances or achievements, self-worth is considered a more stable and global recognition of one’s value as a person.
Humanistic Psychology: In contrast, humanistic theories, like those proposed by Carl Rogers, emphasize self-worth as part of the broader concept of self-actualization and posit that a nurturing environment is essential for developing a positive self-concept.
Social-Cognitive Theory: This theory, developed by Albert Bandura, includes the concept of self-efficacy, which is related to self-worth but focuses more on one’s belief in their ability to succeed in specific situations.

In summary, self-worth theory is specifically concerned with the link between self-acceptance and achievement, while other theories may focus more broadly on the development of self-concept and the role of internal beliefs in motivating behavior.

History of Self-Worth Theory

Martin Covington and his colleagues developed self-worth theory in the 1970s and 1980s. The theory is based on their observations of students’ motivation and behavior in academic settings. Covington first presented his self-worth theory of achievement motivation in a significant way in his 1984 article titled The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications, published in The Elementary School Journal (Covington, 1984). This work laid the foundation for his later contributions and expansions on the theory, including practical applications in educational settings. Covington continued to develop and refine his theory over the years, contributing to our understanding of how self-worth influences motivation and behavior in academic environments

Contingent and Non-Contingent Self-Worth

Contingent Self-Worth

The concept of contingent self-worth refers to a person’s self-esteem that is dependent on fulfilling certain conditions or standards, such as performance, approval, or acceptance. It’s a form of fragile self-esteem because it fluctuates based on environmental conditions. For example, someone with contingent self-worth might feel worthless after a failure or rejection because their self-esteem is tied to success or approval.

Gabor Maté explains contingent self-esteem “depends on circumstances. The greater the void within, the more urgent the drive to be noticed and to be ‘important,’ and the more compulsive the need for status” (Maté, 2010). Joseph Burgo explains that contingent self-esteem “is present under some conditions but vanishes under others, leaving people depleted and self-derogatory.” He continues, “when people are pressured and controlled to achieve particular outcomes, their self-esteem is often dependent on how those things turn out” (Burgo, 2012).

Non-Contingent Self-Worth

In contrast, non-contingent self-worth is a more stable form of self-esteem that does not depend on external conditions or standards. People with non-contingent self-worth maintain a positive view of themselves regardless of successes or failure. They may feel disappointed after a setback, but their overall self-esteem remains intact.

Burgo wrote that, “True self-esteem represents a sound, stable sense of oneself, built on a solid foundation of believing in one’s worth as a human being. It accompanies a well-developed true self in which intrinsic motivation has been maintained, extrinsic limits and regulations have been well integrated, and the process necessary for regulating one’s emotions have been developed. True self-esteem thus accompanies freedom and growth” (Burgo, 2012).

Contingent self-worth can lead to emotional highs and lows, whereas non-contingent self-worth provides a more secure and resilient sense of self-esteem.

Dangers of Self-Worth Based on Achievement

Susan David wrote, “In our attempts to raise our children to be more capable and confident, we’re now hyper-attuned to shielding them from any adverse experiences that we worry may shatter their psyches.” David continues, “Unfortunately, these efforts underestimate a child’s ability to learn and grow from experience, and can have a host of unintended consequences, often the exact opposite of what we had hoped to achieve.”

She explains that the “narrow focus on specific preordained paths to achievement is even more dubious because it assumes a static world.” She concludes that this emphasis on achievement has created “a growing cohort of kids on today’s college campuses who did everything right in high school, aced the SAT, got into a fancy university, and find the academic work a breeze, but are completely baffled by life” (David, 2016.).

Role of Failure in Self-Worth Theory

One of the key concepts in self-worth theory is the impact of failure on the human psyche. Covington and Carol L. Omelich wrote that, “Failures in achievement settings leads to shame and distress” (Covington & Omelich,1979). In a society where others, schools, and employers measure our value by our achievements, failure carries a damaging blow to self-worth.

Heightened arousal motivates action. The weight of shame and distress demand a response. Ideally, we increase effort and succeed. Life, however, is not so simple. Covington and Omelich posit that high effort and failure creates greater shame then low effort and failure (Covington & Omelich,1979). According to the theory, with low effort we can blame our lack of effort on the failure. However, with high effort expended, we typically blame our lack of ability for the failure.

Ted Thomson, John A. Davidson, and James G. Barber explain that experiencing shame from failing burns in our memory. They explain that subsequent attempts to succeed on a task that a person already failed in is frightening. To give maximum effort and fail again is a heavy blow. Unconsciously, the individual may deliberately withhold effort. Self-worth theory posits that ” withdrawing effort allows failure to be attributed to lack of effort rather than low ability. Thereby, threat to self-esteem is reduced” (Thomson, Davidson, & Barber, 1995).

Sometimes our fear of failure is so great, we also protect our children from the painful lessons. We pull them from activities and opportunities too early, fearing they may suffer disappointment. Consequently, we project our fear on them, while simultaneously preventing them from opportunities to grow.

Implications in Real Life

Self-worth theory offers valuable insights into various aspects of human behavior. It helps illuminate patterns of behavior in response to success and failure, as individuals may attribute their achievements to stable internal factors and their failures to external causes. Furthermore, the theory has extensive applications in educational settings, elucidating how students’ fear of failure can impact their motivation and engagement in learning activities.

Covington suggests that contingent self-worth even impacts those who succeed. He wrote that “even among the winners, the psychological casualty rate is prohibitive whether it be reflected in the young, upward-striving entrepreneur who sacrifices the joy of discovery for the sake of conformity, or the gifted child who amasses an enviable academic record as a way to offset persistent self-doubts about worth, doubts that linger nonetheless” (Covington, 1992, p. 153).

Adaptive and Maladaptive Protections of Self-Worth

Protecting our self-worth is a primary goal. Cognitive processes often work behind the curtains of consciousness to accomplish this task. Self-worth is a primary need in many psychological theories. Alfred Adler suggests that the fight against insecurity is a major motivating factor in the development of personality (Adler, 1920). Abraham Maslow places self-esteem as one of our primary human needs (Maslow, 1943). Most theories of defense mechanisms suggest that we employ cognitive processes to protect self-image from stimuli in the environment.

George Vaillant wrote: “The old person, like the infant, struggles with his body. At fifty-five, some men were slowly entering the last stage of the life cycle, where the task is to replace the indignities of physical decay with a sense of unshakable self-worth” (Vaillant, 1998). Perhaps, all of us, no matter what stage in life, must struggle against whatever challenges that accompany that particular stage. Our strength to work through the difficulties falls back on our underlying sense of self-worth.

Our sense of self-worth has a central role in wellbeing and success. It makes sense then that we would be motivated to protect it. We protect our sense of worth by creating narratives. It feels better to interpret our ineptness by saying, “I could succeed if I wanted to.” These narratives protect us from the fears of an overwhelming life. However, many of these protective shields also prevent growth.

Our protections may limit self-reflective learning, interfere with self-determined action, and slyly pass on growth opportunities. In a paradox of life, in our endeavors to protect against feeling helpless, we learn to be helpless.

See Defense Mechanisms and Learned Helplessness for more on these topics

A Narrative Example of Self-Worth Theory in Action

The Tale of Two Artists

In the heart of a bustling city lived two artists, Elena and Milo. Both were talented and passionate about their craft, but they approached their art and self-worth very differently.

Elena was a painter whose self-worth was contingent on the reception of her work. Each brushstroke was laden with the weight of expectation, and her mood mirrored the critiques of her audience. When her paintings sold for high prices and the galleries buzzed with praise, she felt on top of the world. But when critics met her piece with criticism or, worse, indifference, her self-esteem plummeted. The validation of others was the fragile pedestal upon which her self-worth stood.

Milo, on the other hand, had a non-contingent approach to his self-worth. As a sculptor, he found joy in the process of creation itself. His satisfaction came from the act of sculpting, from the feel of the clay in his hands, and from expressing his inner vision. While he appreciated recognition, he did not rely on it for his self-esteem. He celebrated his successes, learned lessons from his failures, but neither defined his sense of worth. His self-esteem was a steady flame that burned regardless of external conditions.

The Grand Event

One fateful evening, both artists unveiled their latest creations at a joint exhibition. Elena’s paintings were bold and evocative, while Milo’s sculptures were intricate and thought-provoking. The crowd gathered, opinions were formed, and reviews were written.

The next day, the critics’ words filled the city’s art columns. Elena’s work was met with mixed reviews—some lauded her innovation, others dismissed her style. Milo’s sculptures were praised for their originality, but some questioned their practicality.

Elena read the reviews and felt her heart sink. The negative comments echoed louder than the positive ones, and her self-worth teetered on the edge. She questioned her talent and her future as an artist. Milo read the same reviews with a different perspective. He was grateful for the praise and took note of the criticism, but neither swayed his core belief in himself. He was already sketching his next project, his self-worth firmly intact.

As time passed, Elena began to see the wisdom in Milo’s approach. She started to paint for herself, not for the accolades. Slowly, her self-worth became less contingent on others and more anchored in her own self-appreciation.

The tale of Elena and Milo is a testament to the power of self-worth theory. It shows how contingent self-worth can lead to a rollercoaster of emotions, while non-contingent self-worth offers a more balanced and resilient life.

Interventions and Support

Understanding self-worth theory can inform the design of interventions aimed at bolstering individuals’ self-esteem, particularly in the face of setbacks and challenges. By nurturing a growth-focused mindset and fostering a supportive environment, it is possible to alleviate the detrimental impact of contingent self-worth on individuals’ well-being.

Understanding self-worth theory provides valuable insights that can guide the development of effective interventions aimed at bolstering individuals’ self-esteem, particularly during challenging times or after experiencing setbacks. This theoretical framework emphasizes the importance of recognizing how deeply intertwined our sense of worth is with our achievements and failures. By identifying these patterns, psychologists and educators can create tailored strategies that help individuals reframe their experiences. For instance, teaching individuals to view challenges as opportunities for growth rather than threats to their self-worth encourages resilience and fosters a healthier relationship with failure. Such interventions could include cognitive-behavioral techniques that assist in reshaping negative thought patterns or mindfulness practices that promote self-acceptance.

Moreover, fostering a supportive environment plays a crucial role in mitigating the adverse effects of contingent self-worth on an individual’s overall well-being. Surrounding oneself with nurturing relationships—whether through family, friends, or community support—can contribute significantly to developing non-contingent self-worth. When people feel valued for who they are rather than what they achieve, it cultivates an atmosphere where personal growth flourishes without the fear of judgment based on performance alone.

Additionally, implementing educational programs centered around emotional intelligence can empower individuals to manage their feelings effectively while reinforcing their intrinsic value independent of external validation. In this way, promoting awareness and understanding of self-worth theory not only enhances individual resilience but also transforms societal attitudes toward success and acceptance in numerous aspects of life.

Associated Concepts

Self-Concept: This refers to the overall perception individuals have of their own abilities, behavior, and unique characteristics. It encompasses the beliefs and values individuals hold about themselves, influencing their thoughts, feelings, and actions.
Social Comparison Theory: According to this theory, individuals determine their own social and personal worth based on how they stack up against others. This comparison can occur in various aspects such as abilities, opinions, and possessions.
Vulnerable Narcissism: This refers to a subtype of narcissism that has notable characteristics of low self-worth.
Ego Investment: This refers to the emotional attachment and identification an individual has with their own beliefs, opinions, abilities, or accomplishments. It involves the personal investment of one’s self-worth and identity in these aspects.
Invalidating Environments: This refers to environments that are detrimental to an individual’s self-worth.
Idealization of Self-Image: This refers to a particular defense mechanisms that relies on an idealization of self to escape the fears and discomforts of vulnerability.
Rogers’ Theory of Self: According to Rogers’ Theory of Self, the self-concept consists of the individual’s perceptions and beliefs about themselves. These beliefs include their abilities, attitudes, and values.

A Few Word by Psychology Fanatic

Martin Covington’s self-worth theory offers a powerful lens through which we can understand the essential role that self-esteem plays in shaping our identities and life experiences. By delving into the factors that influence our perceptions of worth, we empower ourselves to take proactive measures toward enhancing our self-image.

This journey begins with challenging the negative beliefs that often cloud our judgment about ourselves; it requires us to confront those internal narratives that tell us we’re not enough or don’t deserve happiness. Setting realistic goals is another crucial step in this process, as these objectives help create tangible milestones for personal growth, allowing us to celebrate small victories along the way. Additionally, reaching out for support from loved ones can make a significant difference; sharing vulnerabilities fosters deeper connections and reminds us that we’re not alone in navigating life’s complexities.

Ultimately, it’s vital to remember that self-worth is an ongoing journey rather than a fixed destination—one filled with opportunities for continuous self-discovery and growth. Embracing Covington’s insights means acknowledging both our triumphs and setbacks as integral parts of this evolution. As we learn more about ourselves and cultivate resilience against external pressures, we pave the way towards greater self-acceptance and fulfillment in all aspects of life. Each step taken on this transformative path brings us closer to realizing our true potential while fostering an overall sense of well-being. So let’s embark on this journey together—supporting one another as we build lives rich with purpose, authenticity, and genuine connection grounded in unshakable self-worth.

Last Update: August 14, 2025

References:

Adler, Alfred (1920/2011). The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology. ‎Martino Fine Books. ISBN-10: 1614271437; APA Record: 1924-15018-000
(Return to Main Text)

Burgo, Joseph (2012). Why Do I Do That?: Psychological Defense Mechanisms and the Hidden Ways They Shape Our Lives. New Rise Press. ISBN-10: 0988443120
(Return to Main Text)

Covington, Martin V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. The Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 5–20. DOI: 10.1086/461388
(Return to Main Text)

Covington, M., & Omelich, C. (1979). It’s best to be able and virtuous too: Student and teacher evaluative responses to successful effort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 688-700. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.71.5.688
(Return to Main Text)

Covington, Martin; Omelich, Carol (1984). Controversies or consistencies? A reply to Brown and Weiner. Journal of Educational Psychology,76(1), 159-168. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.159
(Return to Main Text)

Covington, Martin (1992) Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521348034; DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173582
(Return to Main Text)

David, Susan (2016). Emotional Agility: Get Unstuck, Embrace Change, and Thrive in Work and Life. Avery; First Edition. ISBN-10: 1592409490
(Return to Main Text)

Maslow, Abraham H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Simon & Schuster. ISBN: 9781627933964; DOI: 10.1037/h0054346
(Return to Main Text)

Maté, Gabor (2010). In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction. North Atlantic Books; Illustrated edition. ISBN-13: ‎978-1556438806
(Return to Main Text)

Thompson, T., Davidson, J., & Barber, J. (1995). Self-Worth Protection in Achievement Motivation: Performance Effects and Attributional Behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology,87(4), 598-610. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.598
(Return to Main Text)

Vaillant, George E. (1998) Adaptation to Life. Harvard University Press; Reprint edition. ISBN: 9780674004146
(Return to Main Text)