As fellow travelers, crossing arid and beautiful landscapes, we should be kind to one another. This is a personal conviction, expressed here as an invitation to consider how we treat one another. The need for kindness reaches from everyday encounters into business and politics.

Our judgments of others can be mistaken. Kindness asks us to leave room for another person’s experience, even when we have not understood it fully.

Kindness in Our Shared Lives

Our lives depend on exchanges with others, many of which we barely notice. In True Belonging, Jeffrey Brantley and Wendy Millstine invite readers to recognize the physical, emotional, and social exchanges on which their lives depend (Brantley & Millstine, 2011).

Psychology offers one connection between this dependence and our capacity to care. Compassion involves concern in response to another’s suffering and a desire to help (Goetz et al., 2010). Such concern gives another person’s difficulty a place in our attention. But we need not wait for suffering to practice kindness; consideration also belongs in the ordinary exchanges that fill a day.

Kindness and Social Responsibility

On a virtual cross-country bike trip, I was struck by the reminders of poverty beyond the inner cities. Whether the setting was an apartment in a crowded city or an old trailer on a barren piece of land, I found myself thinking about the lives unfolding there. The experience reminded me how easily a narrow picture of hardship can leave other people out.

Culture, knowledge, and skills accumulate, passing from generation to generation. Much of what we rely on in society depends on cooperation. Yet the benefits of shared effort are not always shared fairly. When a person or group gathers power, that power can be used to protect an advantage while the needs of others receive little consideration.

We need political representatives to fight for their constituents while remaining keenly aware of how their ideals may affect others. What is good for one region may place a burden on another. Political balance should include a willingness to listen to those who have less power to make themselves heard. Human kindness belongs in these decisions as surely as it belongs in a marriage or a conversation between neighbors.

We need to expand our perspective. Concern for the whole asks us to consider who benefits from our choices and who must live with their costs. Disagreement about how to help will remain. Our responsibility is to keep the people affected by those disagreements within view.

When Cooperation Becomes Unkind

People can cooperate in ways that harm others, including when a majority exploits a minority. Cooperation needs an ethical direction. Joining forces may protect vulnerable people, but it may also make it easier to turn against them. This asks us to examine what our group loyalties lead us to support.

We can excuse harm without giving up the belief that we are decent people. We might tell ourselves that the damage was small, the person deserved it, or someone else was responsible. Albert Bandura called this process moral disengagement, which Celia Moore reviews in her work (Moore, 2015). These excuses deserve a closer look when they make our own side’s cruelty seem acceptable.

On a smaller and more personal scale, consider an online exchange in which several people join in humiliating one person. The approval of the others does not make the humiliation kind. Each participant still has a choice about what to add, what to question, and whether to continue.

Sometimes, we must oppose the status quo, refusing to cooperate with movements that violate our ethical standards. Concern for other people can require resistance, especially when agreement would help conceal the injury being done.

Belonging Without Surrendering Judgment

We have a natural desire for others to appreciate us. Appreciation can signal acceptance, bolstering a sense of security. Baumeister and Leary describe belongingness as a fundamental human motivation: people seek lasting, positive relationships that include repeated interaction and continuing concern for one another (Baumeister & Leary, 1995).

The difficulty comes when appreciation becomes the measure of what we are willing to do. In a group that demands agreement, a thoughtful objection may be treated as disloyalty. We should not expect a family, workplace, or community to require the surrender of every individual difference.

Consider the online exchange described earlier. Someone refuses to join the ridicule and asks the others to stop. The conversation may turn against that person: a familiar voice now seems disloyal. Even a modest refusal can feel costly when it risks acceptance among people whose company matters to us.

Research on people who refuse to go along with something they believe is wrong helps explain this tension. In experiments, people who had gone along with a questionable task sometimes judged someone who refused more harshly than outside observers did. Monin and colleagues suggested that the refusal could feel like an unspoken criticism of their own choices (Monin et al., 2008). The studies explored reactions to taking a stand on principle; they do not show how people respond to every act of kindness.

For our own conduct, the question is how to protect someone’s dignity while leaving others room to reconsider. We can challenge a humiliating remark without making humiliation our method. The response may still be unwelcome. Acceptance remains valuable, but it cannot be the only measure of whether care was worth offering.

Independent thought also asks something of us. An objection is not wiser simply because it is unpopular. We need to listen, consider evidence, and remain open to correction. Kindness allows room for disagreement while asking us to take responsibility for how we express it.

When we focus only on appreciation, our kindness can lose its direction. Still, wanting to be appreciated does not erase concern for someone else. We can welcome gratitude without making it the price of our care. Others may respond warmly, but kindness offers no guarantee of acceptance. Its worth need not disappear when the response disappoints us.

Cultivating Kindness in Everyday Life

Kindness takes shape in ordinary encounters, through conscious effort and a willingness to examine our behavior. We can begin with moments we might otherwise hurry through: listening when someone is struggling to explain, offering help to a neighbor, or pausing before adding a cutting remark. These small moments offer opportunities to respond with care.

Sharing another person’s feelings is one form of empathy. Compassion means caring about their suffering and wanting to help. Singer and Klimecki explain that sharing someone’s pain can sometimes become so overwhelming that we focus on easing our own discomfort and pull away. They call this empathic distress (Singer & Klimecki, 2014). For kindness, the practical question is both what the other person feels and what would help them.

That response may be patient attention, practical assistance, or a respectful limit. We can decline a request without humiliating the person who made it. We can also acknowledge our own imperfections with the gentleness we hope to extend to others. Cultivating kindness leaves room for learning from an unkind moment and returning to the relationship with greater care.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

Kindness can express our love for others and for life. As part of how we live, it reaches beyond a pleasant expression. It asks whether our words and actions leave room for another person’s dignity, particularly when their needs interrupt our own.

As fellow travelers, we will not know the whole story of every person we meet. We can still pause to wonder what they are carrying. In that pause, there may be room to reach beyond the stingy borders of self and make the next stretch of someone’s journey a little less lonely.

Associated Concepts

• Compassion: Concern for another person’s suffering and a desire to help. Compassion connects kindness with a response to distress, while kindness also includes consideration in ordinary encounters.
• Belongingness: The human need for lasting, caring relationships. This need helps explain why resisting a group’s unkind behavior can feel costly.
• Cooperation: Working together toward shared goals. Cooperation supports kindness when those goals protect others’ welfare, but collective action can also enable harm.
• Moral Disengagement: Ways of justifying harmful conduct while continuing to regard ourselves as decent people. Recognizing these explanations invites closer examination of what we excuse in ourselves and our groups.
• Empathy: Understanding or sharing another person’s emotional experience. Empathy can inform a kind response, though understanding someone’s feelings does not automatically lead to helpful action.
• Self-Compassion: Responding to our own suffering and imperfections with kindness and perspective. It offers a way to acknowledge mistakes without turning correction into self-condemnation.

References

Baumeister, Roy F.; Leary, Mark R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
(Return to Main Text)

Brantley, Jeffrey; Millstine, Wendy (2011). True Belonging: Mindful Practices to Help You Overcome Loneliness, Connect with Others, and Cultivate Happiness. New Harbinger Publications. ISBN: 9781572249332.
(Return to Main Text)

Goetz, Jennifer L.; Keltner, Dacher; Simon-Thomas, Emiliana (2010). Compassion: An Evolutionary Analysis and Empirical Review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351–374. DOI: 10.1037/a0018807.
(Return to Main Text)

Monin, Benoît; Sawyer, Pamela J.; Marquez, Matthew J. (2008). The Rejection of Moral Rebels: Resenting Those Who Do the Right Thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.76. PMID: 18605853.
(Return to Main Text)

Moore, Celia (2015). Moral Disengagement. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 199–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.018.
(Return to Main Text)

Singer, Tania; Klimecki, Olga M. (2014). Empathy and Compassion. Current Biology, 24(18), R875–R878. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054. PMID: 25247366.
(Return to Main Text)