Understanding Trauma Bonding

Trauma bonding, also known as Stockholm Syndrome, is a psychological survival mechanism that evolves as a result of consistent abuse or trauma. Contrary to what one might expect, victims may develop a strong emotional attachment or dependence on their abusers. This bond can be further reinforced by intermittent reinforcement, wherein the abuser alternates between abusive behaviors and moments of kindness or affection.

The Stockholm Syndrome

Psychologists coined the term Stockholm Syndrome in 1973, following a botched bank robbery in Stockholm Sweden, where criminal and hostages remained confined for six days. Several reports stated that during the six days of captivity, the victims developed empathy, affection and complicity with their kidnappers.

Psychologists suggest that, “the bond is initially created when a captor threatens a captive’s life, deliberates, and then chooses not to kill the captive. The captive’s relief at the removal of the death threat is transposed into feelings of gratitude toward the captor for giving him or her life” (Britannica: Stockholm Syndrome).

This kind of bonding is exceedingly rare. Perhaps, this is because the relatively short duration of the captivity. However, the concept is applicable to a wider range of circumstances, where bonding occurs between an abuser and victim. Typically, these relationships form over longer periods of time. We see elements of the Stockholm Syndrome in domestic violence, child abuse, and in the sex trafficking industry.

Trauma Bonding as a Survival Strategy

Dr. Lawrence Heller suggests that in extreme abuse the victim adopts survival strategies. He wrote:

“These adaptive strategies, or survival styles, are ways of coping with the disconnection, dysregulation, disorganization, and isolation that a child experiences when core needs are not met” (Heller & LaPierre, 2012).

The child understandably bonds with an abusive parent. The child perceives that their survival depends on the care of adults. By the time a child is old enough to escape, through reporting the abuse, the patters of abuse and survival are set. The child has integrated the abuse as normal. However, these same bonding processes exist in abusive adult relationships.

Researchers found that sex trafficking victims often bond with their abusers. “These bonds are typically marked by paradoxical complexities of abuse, control and dependency, and deep feelings of love, admiration, and gratitude in the victim for the abuser” (Casassa et al., 2022).

Research has also uncovered the same factors in abusive intimate relationships. From the safety of our own lives, we are baffled by the victims continual return to the abuser. We muse “why don’t they just leave.” However, the complexities of bonding and human behavior allude simplistic common sense. Consequently, many unseen factors combine, creating the seemingly inescapable bonds existing in habitual abuse.

Primary Elements Creating Trauma Bonding

Nicole Fonseca and Bruno Oliveira define trauma bonding as “an emotional dependence between two people, in a relationship characterized by periods of abuse, violence and power imbalance, with bonds of intense connection, cognitive distortion and behavioral strategies of both individuals that paradoxically strengthen and maintain the bond, which is reflected in the vicious cycle of violence” (Fonseca & Oliveira, 2021).

• Alternating periods of abuse and violence (punishment) with periods of intense connection (reinforcement)
• Manipulative cognitive and behavioral strategies (often performed by both victim and abuser)

---

The alternating periods of abuse and connection creates a behavioristic conditioning. The reoccurring terror of abuse is relieved by the recurring elements of connection. The victim’s relief at the removal of the fear is transposed into feelings of gratitude toward the abuser. This cycle of violence provides a repeated reinforcing element that creates biological connection in the nervous system.

Casassa, Knight, and Mengo wrote:

“There is the widespread idea that people who remain in relationships considered abusive do so solely motivated by issues of financial, social dependence, low self-esteem and/or psychological dependence. Although such aspects may be pertinent, studies indicate that trauma bonding is what, n fact, keeps subjects in precarious situations in their loving relationships” (Casassa et al., 2022).

Addiction and Love

One theory of trauma bonding suggests that the same circuits involved in chemical addiction are present in romantic bonding. Just as a drug addiction keeps the substance abuser returning to the substance destroying their life, a lover repeatedly returns to the person destroying their life. We see drama relationships, alternating between love and hate, fitting this description.

“Brain systems that evolved to govern attachment between parents and children and between monogamous partners may be the targets of drugs of abuse and serve as the basis for addiction processes” (Burkett & Young, 2012). We don’t have to dig very deep to see the similarities. “At first, each encounter was accomplished by a rush if euphoria—new experiences, new pleasures, each more exciting than the last. Every detail became associated with those intense feelings: places, times, objects, faces. Other interests suddenly became less important as more time was spent pursuing the next joyful encounter” (Burkett & Young, 2012).

Unfortunately, the euphoria of intermittent reinforcement powerfully enslaves the victim. Our brain is repeatedly rescued from disconnection, dysregulation, and disorganization by the gracious creator of those states. We are hooked and can’t escape the trauma bonds.

Chemical Correlates of Bonding

Neuroscience points to brain mechanisms involved in bonding. Our bodies react to the outside world through the release of chemicals into our blood streams. The feel ‘good; or feel ‘bad’ elements of the biological change registers in learning and we begin to associate certain environmental experiences with those feeling states.

Bessel van der Kolk explains that brain structures evolved to detect these changes.

He theorized:

“Beyond sensing the goods or the threats in and of themselves, brains began to use cues to predict the delivery. They would signal the coming of goods with the release of a molecule, such as dopamine or oxytocin; or the coming of threats with cortisol-releasing hormone or prolactin. The release would in turn optimize the behavior required to obtain or avoid the delivery of the stimulus. Brains also became capable of using the pattern of stimuli—for example, the repetition or alternation of stimuli—to predict what might be happening next” (van der Kolk, 2015).

The prediction of connection then produces release of dopamine and oxytocin. In healthy relationships, devoid of fear, the highs of connection settle, fewer extreme lows and fewer extreme highs. The drama of the relationship dissipates into comfortable security. However, where comfortable security doesn’t exist, the excitement and joy from the highs creates the bond.

Outer Characteristics of Trauma Bonding

• Emotional Dependency: Trauma-bonded individuals often become emotionally dependent on their abusers, seeking their approval and validation. The abuser’s intermittent displays of affection can reinforce this dependency, making it even more difficult to break away.
• Isolation: Abusers often isolate their victims, cutting them off from supportive relationships such as friends and family. This isolation intensifies the emotional bond, as the victim’s entire world revolves around the abuser.
• Shifting Power Dynamics: An abuser typically maintains complete control over the victim, creating a power imbalance within the relationship. The abuser may use manipulation, threats, or fear tactics to exert control, making the victim feel powerless and trapped.
• Self-Blaming: Victims of trauma bonding often blame themselves for their abusive situations, believing that they somehow deserve the treatment they are receiving. This self-blame can further strengthen the emotional bond with the abuser.

Effects of Trauma Bonding

Trauma bonding can have profound psychological and emotional effects on individuals, including:

• Confusion: Trauma-bonded individuals may feel conflicted about their abusive relationships, oscillating between love and hate, hope and despair. This emotional rollercoaster can be deeply confusing and disorienting.
• Low Self-Esteem: Victims of trauma bonding may develop low self-esteem and question their self-worth. They may believe that they are unworthy of love and incapable of escaping the abusive relationship.
• Cognitive Dissonance: The stark contrast between the abuser’s cruel actions and occasional displays of kindness can create a state of cognitive dissonance. This internal conflict between one’s beliefs and experiences can be mentally distressing.
• Repetition of Patterns: Without intervention and support, individuals who have experienced trauma bonding may find themselves trapped in a cycle, repeating similar patterns of abusive relationships in the future.

Breaking Free from Trauma Bonding

While breaking the cycle of trauma bonding can be incredibly challenging, it is not impossible. Here are some suggestions for individuals who are seeking to escape such toxic relationships:

• Recognize the Abuse: Acknowledge that the relationship is abusive and identify the unhealthy patterns and dynamics at play.
• Seek Support: Reach out to trusted friends, family members, or professionals who can provide emotional support and guidance throughout the recovery process.
• Establish Boundaries: Set clear boundaries with your abuser and enforce them. This may involve limiting contact or even cutting off all communication.
• Focus on Self-Care: Prioritize your well-being and engage in activities that promote self-care and healing. This may include therapy, self-reflection, journaling, and practicing self-compassion.
• Educate Yourself: Learn about trauma bonding and the dynamics of abusive relationships. Gaining knowledge and understanding can empower you in your journey towards recovery.

Associated Concepts

• Emotional Abuse: This refers to a a pattern of behavior aimed at gaining power and control over another person through the use of emotions. It can involve undermining an individual’s self-worth, manipulating their emotions, or subjecting them to constant criticism, blame, or humiliation.
• Attachment Trauma: This refers to the psychological and emotional distress caused by disruptions in the formation of secure, nurturing relationships during early childhood, particularly within the context of the primary caregiver.
• Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: This is a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event, either by experiencing it or witnessing it. Symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares, severe anxiety, and uncontrollable thoughts about the event.
• Risk Regulation Model: This model refers to an internal regulation systems that individuals use to navigate the intense conflicting demands between self-protecting security and desires for security and belonging.
• Codependency: This is a behavioral condition in a relationship where one person enables another person’s addictive or self-destructive behavior. This can manifest as an excessive reliance on the needs of others for self-esteem and identity, while neglecting one’s own needs and well-being.
• Interdependence Theory: This concept examines how individuals in a relationship depend on each other for outcomes and how this interdependence affects their interactions.
• Rejection Sensitivity: This refers to the tendency to anxiously expect, readily perceive, and overreact to rejection. This topic is relevant to how individuals perceive and respond to potential risks in relationships.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

Trauma bonding is a complex and distressing psychological phenomenon that can leave individuals feeling trapped and emotionally dependent on their abusers. However, with the right support and resources, healing and breaking free from trauma bonding is possible. Remember, you are not alone, and there is hope for a brighter, healthier future beyond the confines of abusive relationships.

Last Update: February 18, 2026

References:

Burkett, James; Young, Larry (2012). The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction. Psychopharmacology, 224(1), 1-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2794-x
(Return to Main Text)

Casassa, Kaitlin; Knight, Logan; Mengo, Cecilia (2022). Trauma Bonding Perspectives From Service Providers and Survivors of Sex Trafficking: A Scoping Review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 969-984. DOI: 10.1177/1524838020985542
(Return to Main Text)

Fonseca, Nicole, Oliveira, Bruno (2021). Trauma Bonding: concepts, causes and mechanisms in intimate relationships. Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento. DOI: 10.32749/nucleodoconhecimento.com.br/psychology/intimate-relationships
(Return to Main Text)

Heller, Lawrence; LaPierre, Aline (2012). Healing Developmental Trauma: How Early Trauma Affects Self-Regulation, Self-Image, and the Capacity for Relationship. North Atlantic Books; 1st edition. ISBN-10: 1583944893
(Return to Main Text)

Van der Kolk, Bessel (2015). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books; Illustrated edition. ISBN-10: 1101608307; APA Record: 2014-44678-000
(Return to Main Text)

Britannica. Stockholm Syndrome. Website: https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockholm-syndrome

Related Articles