The Defense Mechanism of Idealization of Others’ Image

The defense mechanism of idealization of others’ image is a significant psychological concept that involves attributing excessively positive qualities to another person. This process often serves as a coping strategy for individuals grappling with their own insecurities or unresolved conflicts. When faced with uncomfortable emotions, such as fear, jealousy, or inadequacy, individuals may unconsciously project an idealized version of someone else onto reality. By doing so, they create a mental escape that allows them to momentarily divert attention from their vulnerabilities and shortcomings. This form of emotional protection can provide temporary relief but may also lead to unrealistic perceptions and expectations regarding the idealized individual.

However, while this defense mechanism can offer short-term comfort, it carries long-term consequences for interpersonal relationships and personal growth. Idealizing others often results in distorted views that overlook the complexities and flaws inherent in every individual. As these elevated expectations clash with reality, disillusionment may ensue when the idealized person inevitably demonstrates human imperfections. Consequently, individuals who rely heavily on this defense mechanism risk developing superficial connections rather than authentic relationships grounded in mutual understanding and acceptance. Recognizing the tendency to idealize others is crucial for fostering genuine interactions and addressing underlying feelings of insecurity that drive this behavior.

Introduction to Idealization of Others’ Image

In early psychology literature, psychologist lumped idealization of self image and others’ image into the single concept of primitive idealization. Literature often discusses the concept of primitive idealization in the context of developmental and psychoanalytic theories. It refers to an early defense mechanism where an individual attributes exaggeratedly positive qualities to another person or object. Psychology researchers consider this mechanism as “primitive” because it originates in early childhood as part of normal development and is a way for the child to cope with anxiety and internal conflicts.

In psychoanalytic literature, authors closely associate primitive idealization with the formation of the ego and is seen as a way to protect the self from perceived threats or negative feelings. By idealizing someone else, usually a caregiver or parental figure, the child can feel safe and secure. However, if this defense mechanism persists into adulthood, it can lead to difficulties in perceiving others realistically, potentially causing problems in relationships and personal growth.

Primitive idealization is also linked to the concepts of narcissism and object relations theory, where the idealized other is seen as an extension of the self. It’s a way to maintain a positive self-image by associating oneself with others who are viewed as perfect or superior. This can be a temporary measure to deal with stress or low self-esteem, but it may also hinder the individual’s ability to form authentic and mature relationships.

Manifestation of Idealization of Others’ Image

Idealization of others’ image can manifest in various forms, such as idolizing a romantic partner, a parental figure, a friend, or a public figure. Individuals may exaggerate the positive attributes of the idealized person while minimizing their flaws or negative traits. This idealization often stems from a deep-seated desire for emotional security, admiration, or a sense of belonging. By placing someone on a pedestal, individuals seek to create a sense of safety and perfection in their interpersonal relationships, often as a response to underlying feelings of inadequacy or vulnerability.

Henry Prather Laughlin defines idealization as a defense mechanism “through which a person, group, nation, family, or some other object is overvalued and emotionally aggrandized. This dynamism is often marked by an attachment of attention, interest, and significance to a particular love-object which has become exalted, overestimated, and overvalued.” Laughlin continues, “Idealization can be employed to block awareness of painful and perhaps otherwise unacceptable aspects of a significant object or relationship” (Laughlin, 1979, p. 123).

George Vaillant wrote that an idealized “other person is treated like a thing. Even with idealization we have unempathic expectations about the other person: our idols are not allowed to have feet of clay” (Vaillant, 1992, p. 352).

Hero Worship

Laughlin explains that this defense mechanism often is see in hero worship. he explains, when this “process has been sufficiently operative, one then tends to accept everything as ‘good’ about the person. A Fantastic Person is created” (Laughlin, 1979, p. 126). The individual employing idealization overlooks their hero’s lack of morals and ethics. These processes may involve other defense mechanisms such as denial, justification, and projection. Defenses rarely operate independent of other protective cognitive processes. The hero provides a sense or protection against fears. Perhaps, fears that the hero created for their own narcissistic purpose.

Love Interest

Idealizing a lover is normal, up to a point. Unfortunately, when we hold them too high, beyond normal human frailties, we create the conditions for eventual disappointment. Someone that continually falls in love, and then leaves in disappointment may be employing idealization to an extreme. Joseph Burgo wrote that if “you develop many strong enthusiasms that never seem to last, idealization may be at work, especially if the ensuing degree of disappointment is equally intense” (Burgo, 2012).

Psychological Implications

While idealization of others’ image can serve as a temporary defense mechanism, it can also lead to significant psychological implications. When individuals consistently uphold an idealized image of others, they may struggle to maintain realistic perspectives in their relationships. This can cause disillusionment and emotional distress when the idealized person inevitably falls short of the exaggerated expectations.

Joseph Burgo explains that, “Idealization in romantic love depends upon the process of splitting: ambivalence about the loved one is ‘resolved’ by splitting off any feelings or doubts that conflict with True Love and then getting rid of them, usually through the process of projection.” He continues, “The serial romantic clings to the illusion of perfection as long as possible, until reality at last breaks through. Then, the partner who formerly had no flaws suddenly has no value. All-good becomes all-bad” (Burgo, 2012). John Gottman refers to this flip in perception as negative sentiment override (Gottman, 2011).

Ervin Staub explains, “On the other hand, idealization of one’s group may heighten frustration in difficult times. In groups as in individuals, very high self-evaluation often masks self-doubt. Persistent life difficulties may contradict the high self-evaluation and bring self-doubt to the surface” (Staub, 1992). Basically, the idealization is a fantasy. It creates a sense of protection. The idealized person masks our underlying anxiety. The anxiety may be caused from external circumstances or internal insecurities. Typically, the anxiety is a cognitive assessment of insufficient internal resources to manage external demands.

Reasons for Employing Idealization of Others’ image

The employment of idealization as a defense mechanism can serve to alleviate anxiety in several profound ways. Firstly, it often creates a psychological alliance with an individual who is perceived as a savior or protector from our fears and insecurities. By elevating this person to an idealized status, we unconsciously associate ourselves with their perceived strengths and attributes, which can be comforting during times of distress. This sense of connection allows individuals to feel more secure and supported, even if that support is rooted in an unrealistic perception. In essence, by looking up to someone else as a paragon of virtue or capability, the individual temporarily sidesteps confronting their own vulnerabilities.

Moreover, idealization redirects focus away from personal shortcomings and places it on another person who embodies traits that are desirable or aspirational. This shift can provide immediate relief from self-doubt; however, it may also lead to cognitive dissonance when the admired figure fails to meet these exaggerated expectations. Additionally, idealization often acts as a form of denial regarding glaring negative traits associated with those we choose to support—whether they are romantic partners, political figures, or role models. By glossing over these flaws through the lens of admiration or adoration, individuals can maintain their emotional investment without having to grapple with uncomfortable truths about these relationships. Ultimately, while idealization offers short-term comfort by providing a buffer against feelings of inadequacy and fear, it risks fostering dependency on distorted perceptions that hinder authentic connections and personal growth over time.

Genuine, Realistic Connections

Furthermore, the continuous idealization of others may hinder authentic and genuine connections, as it creates an unrealistic standard that others are expected to meet. This can result in strained relationships and interpersonal conflicts, especially when discrepancies between the idealized image and reality become apparent.

Joseph Burgo explains that “under optimal conditions, as idealization fades, we can develop true intimacy based on a realistic appreciation of our partners. When idealization reflects a more powerful defense and an inability to bear the truth, both internal and external, it instead gives way to disillusionment, despair or depression” (Burgo, 2012).

Overly Optimistic

Idealization has some association with overly optimistic evaluations. Phoebe Cramer wrote that is involves overly maximizing the positive or minimizing the negative. She continues, “This category represents one of the components of Pollyannish denial. It may occur as an aspect of idealization and may be accompanied by a note of unfounded optimism. Its purpose is to magnify positive experiences and reduce or eliminate the impact of events that are painful” (Cramer, 2006, p. 303).

The association between idealization and overly optimistic evaluations highlights a critical psychological dynamic that can significantly influence an individual’s perception of reality. This phenomenon, often referred to as “Pollyannish denial,” suggests that individuals may engage in cognitive distortions where they amplify positive experiences while simultaneously downplaying or dismissing negative ones.

Such behavior serves not only as a protective mechanism against emotional distress but also fosters an unrealistic worldview that may be comforting in the short term. However, this skewed perspective can lead to detrimental consequences when faced with adversities or disappointments, as it prevents individuals from adequately processing and addressing negative experiences. For instance, by minimizing painful events or flaws in relationships, people risk cultivating superficial connections built on false pretenses rather than genuine understanding. Consequently, while idealization may provide temporary relief through unfounded optimism, it ultimately hinders personal growth and emotional resilience by obscuring the complexities and nuances of real-life situations and relationships.

An Example of Using Idealization of Others’ Images as a Defense Mechanism

Emily had always looked up to her older sister, Anna, seeing her as the epitome of success and confidence. Growing up, Emily struggled with self-esteem issues and often felt overshadowed by her sister’s achievements. Whenever she faced challenges or felt insecure about her abilities, Emily would think about Anna and how she seemed to handle life effortlessly.

At work, Emily found herself in a competitive environment that reminded her of the dynamics she experienced with her sister. Instead of confronting her feelings of inadequacy, Emily began to idealize her colleague, Sarah. Emily would often say, “Sarah is just amazing; she has everything under control and never cracks under pressure.”

By idealizing Sarah, Emily was using her as a defense mechanism to avoid facing her own insecurities. She placed Sarah on a pedestal, attributing to her qualities of perfection that no one could realistically possess. This allowed Emily to align herself with someone she perceived as strong, which in turn made her feel more secure in the short term.

However, this defense mechanism also prevented Emily from acknowledging and addressing her own growth areas. It wasn’t until Emily recognized that her idealization of Sarah was a way to escape her self-doubt that she began to work on building her own confidence and developing her skills, ultimately finding her unique strengths and path to success.

In this narrative, Emily uses the idealization of others as a defense mechanism to cope with her feelings of inadequacy, which is a common psychological strategy to protect one’s self-image.

Coping Strategies and Interventions

To address the defense mechanism of idealization of others’ image, individuals can benefit from self-reflection, introspection, and therapeutic interventions. Exploring the underlying insecurities and emotional needs that drive idealization can lead to a more balanced and realistic perception of others. Cognitive-behavioral approaches, such as cognitive restructuring and challenging irrational beliefs, can help individuals re-evaluate their idealized perceptions and develop healthier coping strategies.

Additionally, cultivating self-esteem, self-compassion, and assertiveness can reduce the reliance on idealization as a defense mechanism. Embracing vulnerability and accepting the multidimensional nature of individuals can foster more authentic and fulfilling relationships, free from unrealistic expectations and emotional dependency.

Adaptiveness of Idealization of Others’ Image

Defense Mechanism Rating Scale

A common instrument for assessing defense mechanism, and the gold standard of defense mechanism inventories, is the Defense Mechanism Rating Scale (DMRS) (Di Giuseppe & Perry, 2021). This scale rates the different protective mechanisms according to their adaptiveness. This scale measures the defenses by assigning a value of 1 to 7, with level 7 being the most adaptive. Designers of the DMRS consider Idealization of Others’ image an immature defense, categorized under level 4 defenses—minor image-distorting defenses.

Adaptiveness is not a rating of how ethical a mechanism is but how well it works. Researchers consider idealization of others’ image as less adaptive because it relieves immediate discomfort while interfering with personal growth. Immature defenses typically are maladaptive because their impact on futures.

Associated Concepts

• Tend and Befriend Theory: This theory proposes that individual may respond in way to powerful others in a way to protect offspring and maintain the safety within a group, thus enhancing the individual’s survival and that of their kin.
• Neurotic Tendencies: This refer to patterns of thought and behavior typically marked by excessive anxiety, worry, and emotional volatility. Unlike psychotic disorders, which involve a break from reality, neurotic tendencies exist within the realm of normal psychological functioning but represent maladaptive coping mechanisms.
• Idealization of Self Image: This defense mechanism involves the tendency to perceive oneself as exceptionally positive, admirable, or flawless, as a way to cope with feelings of insecurity or inadequacy.
• Maladaptive Behaviors: This refers to behaviors that an organism adopts in reaction to an environmental stress that does not contribute to long term goals of survival and happiness.
• Individual Psychology: Alfred Adler’s theory posits that neurosis is linked to a sense of inferiority and a striving for superiority or success.
• Unconscious Mind: This refers to a reservoir of feelings, thoughts, urges, and memories that are outside of our conscious awareness. This part of the mind influences our behavior and experience, even though we are not aware of it.
• Ego psychology: This is a school of psychoanalysis that focuses on the role of the ego, or the sense of self, in behavior and development. Ego psychology focuses on the ego’s ability to adapt to the demands of the external world while managing inner conflicts.

A Few Words by Psychology Fanatic

In conclusion, the defense mechanism of idealization of others’ image reveals the complex psychological strategies individuals employ to shield themselves from emotional discomfort. By projecting excessively positive qualities onto others, individuals create a buffer against their insecurities and fears, allowing them to temporarily escape feelings of inadequacy or vulnerability. This mechanism can manifest in various contexts—from romantic relationships to admiration for public figures—where individuals seek solace in an idealized perception that offers a sense of security and stability. However, while this temporary reprieve may feel comforting, it is often rooted in an avoidance of confronting deeper emotional issues that require attention.

To foster genuine connections and enhance emotional well-being, it becomes essential for individuals to acknowledge and address these underlying insecurities and behavioral patterns associated with idealization. Engaging in self-reflection and introspection can help illuminate the motivations behind such defense mechanisms, empowering individuals to cultivate more realistic perceptions of themselves and others. Embracing vulnerability allows for authentic relationships built on mutual understanding rather than unrealistic expectations. Ultimately, recognizing the limitations inherent in idealization not only paves the way for healthier interpersonal dynamics but also facilitates personal growth by encouraging individuals to confront their fears head-on rather than retreating into comforting illusions. By doing so, they open up pathways toward greater resilience and emotional authenticity in their lives.

Last Update: August 13, 2025

References:

Burgo, Joseph (2012). Why Do I Do That?: Psychological Defense Mechanisms and the Hidden Ways They Shape Our Lives. New Rise Press. ISBN-10: 0988443120
(Return to Main Text)

Cramer, Phebe (2006). Protecting the Self: Defense Mechanisms in Action. The Guilford Press; 1st edition. ISBN: 9781593852986; APA Record: 2006-08215-000
(Return to Main Text)

Di Giuseppe, M., & Perry, J. (2021). The Hierarchy of Defense Mechanisms: Assessing Defensive Functioning With the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-Sort. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718440
(Return to Main Text)

Gottman, John M. (2011). The Science of Trust: Emotional Attunement for Couples. W. W. Norton & Company; Illustrated edition. ISBN-10: 0393707407; APA Record: 2011-06848-000
(Return to Main Text)

Laughlin, Henry Prather (1979). The Ego and its Defenses. Jason Aronson; 2nd edition. ISBN: 0390541052
(Return to Main Text)

Staub, Ervin (1992). The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group violence. Cambridge University Press; Revised ed. edition. ISBN-10: 0521422140; DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_2
(Return to Main Text)

Vaillant, George E. (1992). Ego Mechanisms of Defense: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 1st edition. ISBN: 9780880484046; APA Record: 1992-97908-000
(Return to Main Text)

Related Articles